[NCAA FB]will USC lose this year


will USC lose this year  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. will USC lose this year

    • Yes
      28
    • No
      20


Recommended Posts

so its most likely going to be TX. vs USC.

i didnt think USC will just play a 1/2 @$$ game and kill Cal, that might be bad news for Fresno St.

Cal avg about 30 points a games, and scored only 7.

GO bulldogs(they played broncos like other bulldog team well on D they did)

It's not limited to the regular season -- they can still lose in the Rose Bowl (which is where they'll likely be, and likely face Texas).

586815561[/snapback]

The whole point of losing is to not make it to the Rose Bowl. If they end up in the Rose Bowl and lose, big whoop, they still got there.

The whole point of losing is to not make it to the Rose Bowl.  If they end up in the Rose Bowl and lose, big whoop, they still got there.

586817643[/snapback]

It does matter because whats the point of getting to the big dance if not to WIN IT!? I hate when people make these type of statements, ever since i was a kid. Just like when your on little league and they tell you it doesn't matter if you win or lose we are here for a good time. No way, i didn't practice hard and become the RBI leader to lose because 2 kids stink and don't want to try. Sorry L3thal, this isn't a personal attack on you, i just can't wrap my mind around this type of logic is all.

ON to USC, i think they are going to get Owned by Texas. They haven't proven anything in a mediocre PAC 10. They beat up on a bunch of average football teams. Their schedule isn't even hard. Arizona State gave them a tough time i guess but that whole program fizzled there-after. The only real team they played was Notre Dame and they almost didn't win, and there was some questionable calls in that game. Texas on the other hand actually stepped up to beat Ohio State and just smacked up everyone else they played ranked or not with their explosive offense. I wouldn't be suprised if the Rose Bowl (a.k.a. Texas vs. USC at home) was Texas 49 USC 24. I am so down on USC that I dare say that if they had to run the Big Ten, ACC, or SEC Schedule they would have lost at least 3 games. Where as Texas would still be undefeated.

My whole point is for one of them to not make it to the big dance. I did not say they should go and then lose. If they go undefeated throughout the regular season, then it doesn't matter what happens in the championship game because its that one game that matters. I would like to see one of these teams lose so the BCS can realize how stupid their system is when they have to pick one of 10 one-loss teams to go to the Rose Bowl.

How can you say USC hasn't played a hard schedule when Texas hasn't faced no competition other than Ohio St.? You're over here bashing USC saying they beat up mediocre teams when the Big 12 is mediocre itself. Take away the narrow win against Ohio St. and Texas has nothing to show. Don't even mention Texas Tech, because we all know they are a fluke.

USC played Notre Dame, Texas played Ohio St., what's your point? Those are the only decent teams both faced.

yeah, i'm with lethal on that one. the big 12 was pretty weak this year. i would say the pac10 actually had a pretty good year (which is unusual for them).

of course we all know that the big 10 is still the toughest ;)

How can you say USC hasn't played a hard schedule when Texas hasn't faced no competition other than Ohio St.? You're over here bashing USC saying they beat up mediocre teams when the Big 12 is mediocre itself. Take away the narrow win against Ohio St. and Texas has nothing to show. Don't even mention Texas Tech, because we all know they are a fluke.

your right.

now lets get back to the topic, because USC and TX havent been set to be in the Rose bowl, both teams can still lose(only if they dont show up to play)

i saw 3 or 4 USC games (cant watch blow outs) and i dont see what people see that say USC isnt the team in the pass.

on offence they are better, D isnt as good but they havent been 100% all year, but look at what they did in the Cal game, cal Avg over 30 points a game but cal only got 10.

______________________________________________

(16) Fresno St. vs. (1) USC @ yahoo

Whatever the case is, Texas and USC will have some pretty good match-ups this weekend. Sure, Texas A&M is below .500 and have had a bad season, but the 12th man makes one hell of a difference during a rivalry game. When rivalry week comes, records do not matter.

What a great game.  It had me on the edge of my seat all game long (besides the 3rd quarter).  Fresno St. sure did impress me like I'm sure they impressed the rest of the nation.

586831252[/snapback]

i agree, game was great! i was HOPING Fresno State would overcome USC last night!

i know, it was all my fault. right when they got the ball back, i was like don't do anything stupid, like throw a pick right here. and then what does he do? this game shoulda gone to OT.

and USC's defense is pourous.

i know, it was all my fault.  right when they got the ball back, i was like don't do anything stupid, like throw a pick right here.  and then what does he do?  this game shoulda gone to OT. 

and USC's defense is pourous.

586833865[/snapback]

I called how it would end to my friends - a pick. The Fresno QB played like crap and USC still barely beat them. I don't care what anybody says, that's not #1-team-in-the-nation caliber play.

I called how it would end to my friends - a pick.  The Fresno QB played like crap and USC still barely beat them.  I don't care what anybody says, that's not #1-team-in-the-nation caliber play.

586834486[/snapback]

He played like crap? He was the reason Fresno St. came back into the game regardless of his 4 INT's. Did you see the throws he made? He was throwing balls right in between USC defenders right on target to his receivers. He is one hell of a QB.

bulldogs QB doesnt have that much power in his arm, i seen many games. some times the ball stay in the air to long but the Fresno St WRs are tall and can jump to get the ball. Fresno St is all about the D and Runing game. Fresno St QB isnt one hell of a QB, he just play a good game, in the pass 2 weeks he played better in the idaho game he didnt play that good.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!