[NCAA FB]will USC lose this year


will USC lose this year  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. will USC lose this year

    • Yes
      28
    • No
      20


Recommended Posts

so its most likely going to be TX. vs USC.

i didnt think USC will just play a 1/2 @$$ game and kill Cal, that might be bad news for Fresno St.

Cal avg about 30 points a games, and scored only 7.

GO bulldogs(they played broncos like other bulldog team well on D they did)

It's not limited to the regular season -- they can still lose in the Rose Bowl (which is where they'll likely be, and likely face Texas).

586815561[/snapback]

The whole point of losing is to not make it to the Rose Bowl. If they end up in the Rose Bowl and lose, big whoop, they still got there.

The whole point of losing is to not make it to the Rose Bowl.  If they end up in the Rose Bowl and lose, big whoop, they still got there.

586817643[/snapback]

It does matter because whats the point of getting to the big dance if not to WIN IT!? I hate when people make these type of statements, ever since i was a kid. Just like when your on little league and they tell you it doesn't matter if you win or lose we are here for a good time. No way, i didn't practice hard and become the RBI leader to lose because 2 kids stink and don't want to try. Sorry L3thal, this isn't a personal attack on you, i just can't wrap my mind around this type of logic is all.

ON to USC, i think they are going to get Owned by Texas. They haven't proven anything in a mediocre PAC 10. They beat up on a bunch of average football teams. Their schedule isn't even hard. Arizona State gave them a tough time i guess but that whole program fizzled there-after. The only real team they played was Notre Dame and they almost didn't win, and there was some questionable calls in that game. Texas on the other hand actually stepped up to beat Ohio State and just smacked up everyone else they played ranked or not with their explosive offense. I wouldn't be suprised if the Rose Bowl (a.k.a. Texas vs. USC at home) was Texas 49 USC 24. I am so down on USC that I dare say that if they had to run the Big Ten, ACC, or SEC Schedule they would have lost at least 3 games. Where as Texas would still be undefeated.

My whole point is for one of them to not make it to the big dance. I did not say they should go and then lose. If they go undefeated throughout the regular season, then it doesn't matter what happens in the championship game because its that one game that matters. I would like to see one of these teams lose so the BCS can realize how stupid their system is when they have to pick one of 10 one-loss teams to go to the Rose Bowl.

How can you say USC hasn't played a hard schedule when Texas hasn't faced no competition other than Ohio St.? You're over here bashing USC saying they beat up mediocre teams when the Big 12 is mediocre itself. Take away the narrow win against Ohio St. and Texas has nothing to show. Don't even mention Texas Tech, because we all know they are a fluke.

USC played Notre Dame, Texas played Ohio St., what's your point? Those are the only decent teams both faced.

yeah, i'm with lethal on that one. the big 12 was pretty weak this year. i would say the pac10 actually had a pretty good year (which is unusual for them).

of course we all know that the big 10 is still the toughest ;)

How can you say USC hasn't played a hard schedule when Texas hasn't faced no competition other than Ohio St.? You're over here bashing USC saying they beat up mediocre teams when the Big 12 is mediocre itself. Take away the narrow win against Ohio St. and Texas has nothing to show. Don't even mention Texas Tech, because we all know they are a fluke.

your right.

now lets get back to the topic, because USC and TX havent been set to be in the Rose bowl, both teams can still lose(only if they dont show up to play)

i saw 3 or 4 USC games (cant watch blow outs) and i dont see what people see that say USC isnt the team in the pass.

on offence they are better, D isnt as good but they havent been 100% all year, but look at what they did in the Cal game, cal Avg over 30 points a game but cal only got 10.

______________________________________________

(16) Fresno St. vs. (1) USC @ yahoo

Whatever the case is, Texas and USC will have some pretty good match-ups this weekend. Sure, Texas A&M is below .500 and have had a bad season, but the 12th man makes one hell of a difference during a rivalry game. When rivalry week comes, records do not matter.

What a great game.  It had me on the edge of my seat all game long (besides the 3rd quarter).  Fresno St. sure did impress me like I'm sure they impressed the rest of the nation.

586831252[/snapback]

i agree, game was great! i was HOPING Fresno State would overcome USC last night!

i know, it was all my fault. right when they got the ball back, i was like don't do anything stupid, like throw a pick right here. and then what does he do? this game shoulda gone to OT.

and USC's defense is pourous.

i know, it was all my fault.  right when they got the ball back, i was like don't do anything stupid, like throw a pick right here.  and then what does he do?  this game shoulda gone to OT. 

and USC's defense is pourous.

586833865[/snapback]

I called how it would end to my friends - a pick. The Fresno QB played like crap and USC still barely beat them. I don't care what anybody says, that's not #1-team-in-the-nation caliber play.

I called how it would end to my friends - a pick.  The Fresno QB played like crap and USC still barely beat them.  I don't care what anybody says, that's not #1-team-in-the-nation caliber play.

586834486[/snapback]

He played like crap? He was the reason Fresno St. came back into the game regardless of his 4 INT's. Did you see the throws he made? He was throwing balls right in between USC defenders right on target to his receivers. He is one hell of a QB.

bulldogs QB doesnt have that much power in his arm, i seen many games. some times the ball stay in the air to long but the Fresno St WRs are tall and can jump to get the ball. Fresno St is all about the D and Runing game. Fresno St QB isnt one hell of a QB, he just play a good game, in the pass 2 weeks he played better in the idaho game he didnt play that good.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
    • The Surface Pro 7+ already has a USB C port which can be used for everything you mentioned, except for eGPUs. Meanwhile, microsoft have gotten rid of ALL of the following that are present in the Surface Pro 7+:
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!