Nintendo Revolution Controller Revealed


Recommended Posts

So you can say Microsoft has been there  :laugh:

586533051[/snapback]

stop-posting.gif

Seriously, I have only been here 1 day and you are the biggest fanboy and one of the most annoying people I have ever seen on a forum.

Are you sure MS isn't paying you for posting the stuff you post?

What I meant is you can see a piece there that's thin and with few buttons on the right side,

on the left side (seperated by the ball) you see a semi analog d-pad and some buttons. Now that must remind you of something.

Freestyle Pro had tilt sensing like the new revolution controller and was even marketed as REVOLUTIONary. You can't deny that on the fact that there were just few games that supported it!

Anyway I'm not claiming Nintendo is copying anything, THEY ARE NOT. It's just a funny coincidance.

I could see a few cases where this could be neat. But for the vast majority, this could be Nintendo out-doing themselves, and actually managing to make a worse controller than the god-awful GameCube pad.

Very interesting to say the least, i think this will bring a lot out of their first party games. Both the DS and Revolution are more hands on than their competitors, but i see it only working for the DS. It's gonna be tough to play third party games. But Nintentdo probably made the controller with that in mind and it might actually end up being really good.

Either way I cant wait, it's gonna be very intersting.

I could see a few cases where this could be neat.? But for the vast majority, this could be Nintendo out-doing themselves, and actually managing to make aworse> controller than the god-awful GameCube pad.

586533086[/snapback]

Have anyone tested it yet? Nope...

But I understand your concern.

I think it looks great. The big thing is you don't *see* the functionality from the pictures. The tilt and directional sensors are entirely invisible. Imagine this with Metroid:

You control your position with the analog stick attachment. Forward, back, strafe left and right. With the d-pad side, you point your head to aim and fire. You're not just pressing a button or stick to change your direction, you're physically moving your hand to do so. It brings direct manipulation to the console world, something that PC gamers have had forever with a mouse. It may not seem major, but direct manipulation in the console space is absolutely huge.

In addition, I think this is going to force people to get more creative when making games. I'm sick of what is essentially the same set of games over and over with differing storylines and graphics. With a new controller to think about, I bet this will inspire some really great games. Nothing that requires a crazy backstory to play, just something simple and fun. Imagine Super Monkey Ball or Katamary Damacy on this thing, for example!

well.. my friend and I were refreshing IGN like mad when it all happened. Excited we are. and Surprised we are too.

I stayed away from neowin - not for any specific reason. We were just refreshing IGN, thats all.

We are very excited to see that controlling a game will be different in many different ways. We discussed what would make a good game with that and we both agree, When the revolution gets good games - the revolution controller will shine.

that being said i'm still refreshing IGN like mad to see the full keynote. and I'm interested in the xbox 360 keynote as well,. Anybody know when the PS3 keynote is?

I have been a PC gamer for years. I have always chosen to play PC games over console games. I like how you use the mouse to look around in FPS and control the cursor in RTS games. This will also be a very different experience than what most people are used to in playing games. I for one believe that Nintendo has just revived my love for console games for the first time since the SNES.

I read the article, and I think the whole concept is stupid. I'm tired of seeing bongo drums, dance mats, wired analog sticks that slide into essentially broken controllers, and requiring backward compatibility with older controllers to make the console useable. Apparently, breaking a capable controller design into two separate peices you'll need to buy separately, and assemble controllers before playing games, etc. is equivalent to "innovative design." It would be innovative if you owned the company and you found a new way to suck the blood from the consumers, but I simply fail to see why any of you think this is good from an end user standpoint.

And just for the record, the Gamecube controller did suck. The giant buttons on the top that required you to push them in almost a complete inch before they done anything, the analog stick (now you can purchase this separately! Yay!) had horrible traction and your thumb would constantly slip, the buttons on the side are a pain to use with any sort of accuracy so action-packed games are nearly impossible, etc. It was a huge step up from the N64, but it is nowhere near "the most comfortable one around."

586532390[/snapback]

it depends on what games u play on it of course most common 3d games its good for gc controllers looking at ur avatar i assume that u r a mega man fan and i understand that this kind of controllers wont be good for classic games like KOF, SF, mega man and castlevania.

But posibilities are endless for me the best control so far its snes its lite, precise and not heavy.

-bYtE,Sep 16 2005, 06:54]Have anyone tested it yet? Nope...

But I understand your concern.

586533091[/snapback]

I'm just trying to imagine the sensation of holding those two items in my hands or trying to play Zelda with my TV remote and it seems like a terrible experience.

I certainly could be wrong, and I'll definitely try it out (either at a store, or a friend's house). But it makes me wary of the Revolution. I bought a GameCube, used it for nothing but Smash Bros for a while... Played a little Metroid, played a little Zelda (and was very disappointed, not by the gameplay but by the lack of actual content and the endless sailing timesink), and a little Mario Kart when it first came out. It hasn't even been turned on in at least 8 months, maybe more. It just seems like a waste. Though I do have a little bit of hope for the next Zelda game.

I like Nintendo and I'm by no means predicting their failure. But the thing is, I no longer expect to be impressed by them. They've lowered my expectations to pretty much nothing.

On the other hand, I have high expectations for the Xbox 360. I'll be happy with my purchase if it meets or exceeds my expectations. Whereas, the Revolution is going to have to exceed my expectations before I'll even consider buying it.

I'm just trying to imagine the sensation of holding those two items in my hands or trying to play Zelda with my TV remote and it seems like a terrible experience.

I certainly could be wrong, and I'll definitely try it out (either at a store, or a friend's house).  But it makes me wary of the Revolution.  I bought a GameCube, used it for nothing but Smash Bros for a while... Played a little Metroid, played a little Zelda (and was very disappointed, not by the gameplay but by the lack of actual content and the endless sailing timesink), and a little Mario Kart when it first came out.  It hasn't even been turned on in at least 8 months, maybe more.  It just seems like a waste.  Though I do have a little bit of hope for the next Zelda game.

I like Nintendo and I'm by no means predicting their failure.  But the thing is, I no longer expect to be impressed by them.  They've lowered my expectations to pretty much nothing.

On the other hand, I have high expectations for the Xbox 360.  I'll be happy with my purchase if it meets or exceeds my expectations.  Whereas, the Revolution is going to have to exceed my expectations before I'll even consider buying it.

586533219[/snapback]

You say they lowered your expectations to nothing yet you define no reason why, all I heard was the Xbrick raised your expectations, yet it's a conventional system, you also did not say any reason on why that rose your expectations either.

I'm just trying to imagine the sensation of holding those two items in my hands or trying to play Zelda with my TV remote and it seems like a terrible experience.

I certainly could be wrong, and I'll definitely try it out (either at a store, or a friend's house).  But it makes me wary of the Revolution.  I bought a GameCube, used it for nothing but Smash Bros for a while... Played a little Metroid, played a little Zelda (and was very disappointed, not by the gameplay but by the lack of actual content and the endless sailing timesink), and a little Mario Kart when it first came out.  It hasn't even been turned on in at least 8 months, maybe more.  It just seems like a waste.  Though I do have a little bit of hope for the next Zelda game.

I like Nintendo and I'm by no means predicting their failure.  But the thing is, I no longer expect to be impressed by them.  They've lowered my expectations to pretty much nothing.

On the other hand, I have high expectations for the Xbox 360.  I'll be happy with my purchase if it meets or exceeds my expectations.  Whereas, the Revolution is going to have to exceed my expectations before I'll even consider buying it.

586533219[/snapback]

For my case I have loved almost every title on GC. From Zelda to Metroid. I've played on my GC alot. And it didn't end until DS came...

It's the quite opposite for me. I have really greate expectation now, I would love to test this way of playing games now.

And I have no interest in 360 at all. Of all the titles I have seen, there is only 2 games that is of any interest. But it's just opinions, and everyone have them...

I personally think its great. Very intuative and gives plenty of room for new gameplay styles.

I applaud Nintendo for their bravery and ingenuity.

586533348[/snapback]

Bravery? More like stupidity, there is a big number of gamers that have a disability of somekind. Now if their disability effects their hand (like me) or co-ordination then how the hell are they meant to use the controller? I think Nintendo have just lost the vast majority of disabled customers.

Also how are multi platform games expected to work.

Omg I hope people are watching the video! This is going to be fun to play with :D. Man talk about innovation. Great job Nintendo!

Lazy Tiger: I'm sure that you'll be able to use the GC controller for most games. For example, you dont need to use a wheel to play driving games. I'm sure they've thought this over.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!