Marijuana or Alcohol?


What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)  

509 members have voted

  1. 1. What would you rather see legal (Support your answer!)

    • Marijuana
      289
    • Alcohol
      220


Recommended Posts

Let's look at both of these substances when taken in moderation. Do not counter these facts by saying "Well, More is very bad!" Of course more is bad! THat's WHy I'm saying let's check it out when taken IN MODERATION.

Alcohol/Ethanol? Healthy.

-One Beer a day is proven to provide a fair amount of antioxidants needed to keep the elasticity of arteries.

- One glass of wine a day? Very healthy for the heart this has been proven countless number of times

- A small amount of vodka reduces the risk of of heart disease and some forms of cancer.

Marijuana? Zero health benefits, except

- Great pain killer for patients going through unbearable physical pain

For the average joe, Alcohol does good. Marijuana does no good, unless you consider getting high and mentally impaired healthy. Get it?

Besides, pot is so high school, that's what kids are always curious to try at a certain age, so many have tried it it's a fact let's not hide it. You become a badboy when you smoke that baby up yeah! That's right! you feel good, you're like "I DID IT! I SMOKED POT!" You're man enough to chill with 50 cent and 50 rupies and that guy in the street who rights stuff on walls. You're da thugster! You're a big boy now! Sponsored by PullUps.

Only Rastafarians like Bob Marley should legally smoke weed. They have a reason. They rule, you don't. THey make great music, you keep saying stupid things in class.

k I'm lost :wacko:

Let's look at both of these substances when taken in moderation. Do not counter these facts by saying "Well, More is very bad!" Of course more is bad! THat's WHy I'm saying let's check it out when taken IN MODERATION.

Alcohol/Ethanol? Healthy.

-One Beer a day is proven to provide a fair amount of antioxidants needed to keep the elasticity of arteries.

- One glass of wine a day? Very healthy for the heart this has been proven countless number of times

- A small amount of vodka reduces the risk of of heart disease and some forms of cancer.

Marijuana? Zero health benefits, except

- Great pain killer for patients going through unbearable physical pain

For the average joe, Alcohol does good. Marijuana does no good, unless you consider getting high and mentally impaired healthy. Get it?

Besides, pot is so high school, that's what kids are always curious to try at a certain age, so many have tried it it's a fact let's not hide it. You become a badboy when you smoke that baby up yeah! That's right! you feel good, you're like "I DID IT! I SMOKED POT!" You're man enough to chill with 50 cent and 50 rupies and that guy in the street who rights stuff on walls. You're da thugster! You're a big boy now! Sponsored by PullUps.

Only Rastafarians like Bob Marley should legally smoke weed. They have a reason. They rule, you don't. THey make great music, you keep saying stupid things in class.

k I'm lost :wacko:

Got any links to reputable sites to back that up? I know alcohol in moderation is healthy, but so's marijuana. You just seem very biased.

Also it's not very 'high school' I don't know when you were last at high school but we don't think like that. I'm at high school now and I quite enjoy a good spliff every now and then with my mates, I often have one before exams to calm my nerves, at lunchtimes when I've had a bad day or at parties when I just want to have a good time.

I'm sure I could do the same with alcohol, in fact I often used to. After a hard day it was nice to come home and have a beer (or a few) but it's highly impractical to carry around bottles of alcohol with you at school or around towns.

Rainman, I would consider even replying to your post if you did not do the following:

-Group the millions of marijuana users that vary in race, age, sex, religion and profession into highschool boys wanting to be thug.

-Ignored the recent medical research about marijuana showing it promotes brain cell growth, possibly blocks certain types of cancer, is proven treatment for multiple medical conditions (Gluacoma anyone?) and so forth. As for dangers, you ignored the research linking it to possibly increased chances of developing schizophrenia.

So not only were you making a biased, skewed and misinformed post, but you didn't even do so as good as you could. Come on, at least throw Schizophrenia links somewhere in there if you want to make Marijuana look like the bad guy. Pfft.

Rainman, I would consider even replying to your post if you did not do the following:

-Group the millions of marijuana users that vary in race, age, sex, religion and profession into highschool boys wanting to be thug.

-Ignored the recent medical research about marijuana showing it promotes brain cell growth, possibly blocks certain types of cancer, is proven treatment for multiple medical conditions (Gluacoma anyone?) and so forth. As for dangers, you ignored the research linking it to possibly increased chances of developing schizophrenia.

So not only were you making a biased, skewed and misinformed post, but you didn't even do so as good as you could. Come on, at least throw Schizophrenia links somewhere in there if you want to make Marijuana look like the bad guy. Pfft.

Yes you're right. I did read about the cell growth thing regarding marijuana but that's a different story bud. They take marijuana and testt as an actual drug that's consumed like other prescribed drugs, not smoked in a big blunt a few times a day getting high from it which is what you guys do. When they say a joint has 5-6 times more tar than a cigarette, how many times must that be proven? And that's just one of the many negative things about smoking blunts.

When you see an article that says "Marijuana may help solve... <some bad health thing>", you gotta remember that marijuana tests by scientists don't involve getting people high til they notice something possibly beneficial, but that's what all you smokers do, smoke them blunts and go high.

When you drink alcohol in moderation, you expect results and one can feel better, healthier. I doubt that there's a common health improvement among most smokers who regularly get high. If there was, they wouldn't be making articles on "Marijuana possibly healthy regarding..", they'd confirm it and screw that coffin up once in for all but it's a debate that still goes on and on and on while alcohol has already been proven to provide the benefits that many claim.

Alcohol is legal because although it does have mind altering affects, it is still in many tastey drinks, and has health benifits when taken in moderation. Its abusers give it a bad name.

Marijuana is another story. Aside from being a lot unhealthier than a cigarette, the reason people smoke it is because of it's mind altering affects. I mean, who can honestly say that they smoked their last joint because it tastes really good and they didn't get a high from it.

Rainman, this is why I don't argue. Your basing your **** off assumptions. You think I'm another "yeah yeah lets roll around and smoke some L's G!"

No. When I smoke alone, it's usually pack a bowl, smoke 2-4 hits then set it down until later.

I've read plenty of reports that Marijauna has closer to half the tar of ciggs, and that the buds have even less than the leaves, which have the most tar. I don't know which to believe, but like I said....I smoke and I enjoy it, but skating is far more important to me. If Marijuana had any serious effect on my respiration and athletic ability, I simply would not do it. I am not saying everyone experiences as few negative side effects as I do, I'm just giving my personal experiences.

J, when I smoke it's usually because it relaxes me. I also am quite fond of the taste honestly. I smoke real high quality bud though, which makes a big difference as far as taste goes. I get excited when a new strand comes around so I can see how it smell / tastes, it's part of what I enjoy about it. I like comparing different types and how they make me feel. I'm not looking to get ****ed up, I generally smoke after I skate to relax and help me pass out, similar to someone listening to soft music after a stressful day at work.

Oh well, I don't really like these types of threads as much as I used to. It's really rare I see someone on the anti-pot side argue with facts, rather than using exxaggerations, extreme examples, propoganda and so forth. Some of you have tried to make good points against marijuana and I welcome your input, but a lot of you are just too uninformed or inexperienced to really know what you're saying isn't true. You can argue this post however you want, but frankly I don't care. I know where I stand, I know marijuana is indeed dangerous in specific ways, but I also know that I consider it worth it. The benefits far outweight he negatives in my experience, and it's one of the many things life offers me that I enjoy.

* Marijuana is fat-soluble, and it stays in the body for weeks, unlike alcohol, which is water-soluble and leaves the body in hours. It is a complex mixture of over 400 chemicals and over 60 cannabinoids, (missing in tobacco) including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient. [1] THC, the marijuana ingredient associated with health "benefits", is currently available in pill form as Marinol TM,, and it can be administered in known and precise doses, unlike smoked marijuana. [2] For each medical condition for which smoked marijuana is claimed to be beneficial, there are other drugs available that are superior to marijuana. [3] But we don?t wanna hear about that, right? It would remove the real reason we want people to believe that cannabis has unique therapeutic characteristics: because we like to smoke it, and get stoned!

* One study based on instrumental quantitative analysis of toxic components of cannabis smoke found that smoking a "joint" of marijuana caused over 10 times as much lung damage as smoking one cigarette. [4] Where did lung cancer go, dear anti-tobacco/pro-marijuana activists? Shouldn?t we be at least 10 times as concerned about marijuana as we are about tobacco, assorted ministries of health and antitobacco freaks?

* Marijuana has not been shown to be a safe and effective drug in lowering intraocular pressure and preventing optic nerve damage for glaucoma patients. To maintain a low intraocular pressure with marijuana, a person would have to smoke a joint every 1 to 2 hours, 10 to 12 joints a day, and 4,000 a year. [5] That would put the toxic chemical intake at an equivalent of 100 to 144 cigarettes a day (or 36, 000 to 52,000 a year) ? a far cry from the 20 cigs of an average tobacco smoker.

* Smoked marijuana threatens patients with bacterial and fungal infections; it has been demonstrated that infectious agents can be found on marijuana leaves, [6] because it is clandestinely produced, and not subject to the obsessive quality controls that the targeted tobacco industry is. Cancer and AIDS patients are immuno-compromised and are extraordinarily sensitive to invasion by bacteria and fungi. [7] It is true that legalisation would go toward eliminating this problem, but Mr. Sweanor certainly does not refer to any future.

* According to a leading medical journal, marijuana users had 55% more industrial accidents than non-users. The same study found that marijuana users had 85% more injuries at work than non-users. [8] But there is positively no need for studies or medical skills to observe that marijuana decreases motor skills, concentration and coordination, and that accidents result from a distortion of time and space relationships. Not surprisingly, none of this is a problem for tobacco smokers, who do not fall into an idiotic, dumb stupor every time they light up. Furthermore, marijuana users have been shown to have a 78% increase in absenteeism over non-users.

So true.

Thankfully marijuana is not addictive in the same way as tobacco so the kiddies mostly stop taking it when they leave all there buddies in School/University and join the real world.

Mostly. (haha)

300,000 people died last year from alcohol poisoning and drunk driving. A whopping one person - 1 - died from marijuana.

Alcohol is horrible for your liver, you can't make rational decisions when you're drunk, you drive like a moron (but think you're awesome), you can't remember what happened the next day, and your head hurts like a bitch when you wake up. Let's not forget about alcohol poisoning.

Pot, in moderation, is slightly damaging to the lungs (less so than tobacco, though) and has no major ill effects. You get the munchies and you get kinda tired, but you can still make rational decisions and most people can drive just fine stoned. If you smoke too much weed, you just pass out. You can't possibly overdose, except for the one guy that ate 3 OZ of it. I bet he died happy.

Looking at the numbers and facts... I'm gonna say +1 for the w33d.

Peace,

Pete Zaria.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!