A Neowin Guide to Linux Distributions


Recommended Posts

Afternoon...

Basically after a lil help starting out with Linux... basically just want something i can have a serious play around with and hopefully not kill my old comp too much

Machine Specs

475Mhz Amd Processor,

128megs Ram ... old crappy ram remember :blush:

As Much Hdd space as anything should need

Ati Graphics card,

Eventually i would like to run linux on other machines, just want to get started with Linux, and hopefully learn more from there... :whistle:

Checky

{edit} - would also possibly like to be able to get some of the stuff i use in Xp now to work on it also, Winamp, Msn and so on... is there Linux versions of these proggys or would i have to do something magical to have em on a Linux machine?

Afternoon...

Basically after a lil help starting out with Linux... basically just want something i can have a serious play around with and hopefully not kill my old comp too much

Machine Specs

475Mhz Amd Processor,

128megs Ram ... old crappy ram remember :blush:

As Much Hdd space as anything should need

Ati Graphics card,

Eventually i would like to run linux on other machines, just want to get started with Linux, and hopefully learn more from there... :whistle:

Checky

{edit} - would also possibly like to be able to get some of the stuff i use in Xp now to work on it also, Winamp, Msn and so on... is there Linux versions of these proggys or would i have to do something magical to have em on a Linux machine?

Welcome to Neowin! :D

I would probably go for Slackware for that system. Mandrake and Fedora would work, but they'd be a bit sluggish. I found that Mandrake was a bit of RAM hog, as well.

As for Winamp, there is XMMS, a complete Linux clone of Winamp 2. For MSN, you can use GAIM, which also works with AIM, Jabber and I think Yahoo! as well.

475Mhz Amd Processor,

128megs Ram ... old crappy ram remember  :blush:

As Much Hdd space as anything should need

Ati Graphics card,

Should be OK for most things. A bit more RAM never hurts, and the "heavier" Desktop Environments (like KDE and Gnome) may be sluggish, but you will be able to use IceWM, TWM, or other lighter Window Manager ok. [Linux GUI Overview: you have XFree running a Windowing System - but that is not a manager, it lays the groundwork. then you have Window Managers that handle the windowing. on top of that, you can have a full Desktop Environment, with all the bells & whistles. You are going to probably be at the basic Window Manager level. There are many to choose from)
would also possibly like to be able to get some of the stuff i use in Xp now to work on it also, Winamp, Msn and so on... is there Linux versions of these proggys or would i have to do something magical to have em on a Linux machine?
Your distro you choose will be able to do these things. Again there are lots of choices. mplayer or xine are common media players, and gaim or amsn can do your msn messenging. (gaim can do yahoo, aol, icq, msn and more. amsn is strictly for MSN messenging, but looks a lot like the MS version). There is a program called 'wine' that can run some Windows programs, but I recommend a "native Linux" solution over a wine solution any day. :yes:

Hope that helps. :)

(your next question of "which distro" has many, MANY answers. Pick one that is noob-friendly, and go with it.)

Yeah, I'm serious. I was going to learn Red Hat, but they stopped caring about the home users,
RedHat is a company, not a group of teenage hackers. They have stockholders to answer to. They have always (and STILL) release the source to their Linuxes (including their Enterprise servers, I beleive). They just stopped making .ISOs of them. They spun-off their home/hobbyist market (which has always lost money for them) as Fedora Core. It is free (libre) and free (gratis). To start slagging RedHat for "no support" when their source is still freely available would make as much sense as slagging Gentoo because they offer only source to download and compile (no .iso images there, either).
and most of the other distributions are now not for free
There are free (again, I assume you mean 'gratis') releases of almost all linux distros. Even Lindows has so many 'free download" offers, that it can be considered a "free beer" distro... Mandrake, SuSE, Debian, Slack, Gentoo, RedHat, Fedora are all available free for download. Legally.

Try any of the major distros. I am a RedHat guy since RHL 5.1, and use Fedora now. It is what I am used to, and it performs well for me.

There are free (again, I assume you mean 'gratis') releases of almost all linux distros. Even Lindows has so many 'free download" offers, that it can be considered a "free beer" distro... Mandrake, SuSE, Debian, Slack, Gentoo, RedHat, Fedora are all available free for download. Legally.

Try any of the major distros. I am a RedHat guy since RHL 5.1, and use Fedora now. It is what I am used to, and it performs well for me.

Thanks for clarifying the subject for me markjensen :)

Much appreciated!

...Gentoo because they offer only source to download and compile (no .iso images there, either).

For your information, Gentoo does offer .iso LiveCDs to get you started. They include a portage tree snapshot and stage 1 - 3 tarballs.

Of course they're Gentoo. The whole idea of a LiveCD is so that you can boot into an installation environment. If you already have Linux installed you could just download the Stage1 tarball and start running. And honestly, I've done one of each stage, a 1, a 2, and a couple 3s, and I've not noticed much, if any, speed difference in everyday use between the 3 types of installs. The one area that was noticeable, for me at least, was in compile speed/time. A stage1 seems to compile programs faster than a stage3, or even a stage2. But for normal desktop use, I've not noticed any differences.

There is also Xandros, it is a debian based distro. its pretty much for beginners and businesses. It auto-mounts ntfs/fat32 drives, auto-configures samba, includes the crossover plugin, so you can run some window applications, including office products (upto xp). It is extreamly easy to use, as you can use rpm, deb, or tarballs to install applications.

Some faults though are that currently there is 'no' downloadable iso/ftp install. you have to purchase it unless you are willing to wait a couple of months for the demand on their servers to die down. another fault is that it uses a modified kds windows manager, with no option to install gnome. this goes with other managers, as well as newer kernels, as they are modified by xandros

Knoppix: KDE

Gnoppix: Gnome

Just because I can, and it might be appreciated....

LiveCD concept using Slackware and 8cm/3" mini-CDs:

SLAX: KDE (3.2)

GONX: Gnome

GONX should be released this coming week. It's still extremely new - but you bet your bunnies, I'm on it for my new mini-CD LiveCD distro. SLAX is just *cool* for a LiveCD distro. Nothing like LiveCD Slackware goodness.

I'll give more details on the subject later - I'm getting yelled at that my typing is too loud. Silly 3AM posts!

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
mini distros like knoppix, and demolinux boot straight from cd, they are great for having a taste of what is like without needing to have a spare machine, partitioning, or geting a new HD. they are also fantastic recovery tools!

yeah- Knoppix rulez! check out the dvd version ppl :)

I use suse9.0 too

  • 5 weeks later...

i dunno how many hungarians visit htis board, but anyways..

UHU Linux

A very good Hungarian distro. It is kind of a mixture of leading distros: the installer and the default 'Bluecurve theme' on most of the applications come from Redhat, and the apt-get packaging system is from debian. It is all packed with good packages, mostly the most popular applications. It comes with several window-managers (Gnome, KDE, Blackbox, IceWM, XFce) to choose from. Very user-friendly, and stable. A very good choice for starters. And it is free to download. 2 CDs, but the 2nd one is optional, since it is not needed by the installer, it just conatins extra packages.

Current stable version: 1.1.1

(1.2 is available to download for beta-testing.)

Website/FTP:

http://www.uhulinux.hu

ftp://ftp.uhulinux.hu/ISO/uhu-linux-1.1.1-cd1.iso

ftp://ftp.uhulinux.hu/ISO/uhu-linux-1.1.1-cd2.iso (optional)

A live version is also available at:

http://www.uhulivecd.linuxuser.hu

ftp://ftp.linuxforum.hu/UHU-Rescue/live_2.1/uhu_live_2.1.iso

(not affiliated with the original UHU project, it is the work of an individual UHU fan)

Note: the live cd, the websites and the UHU installer is in Hungarian. But if you manage to install it (no big deal), it works flawlessly in English too...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!