FAQ / Common Problems & Solutions


Recommended Posts

Concerning the trust issue... TRUST NO ONE :D :laughing my ass off:

Not such a bad idea on slipstreaming AP into XP, but alas there are some copyright and digital rights to be taken into account when considering such ideas. :yes:

What I learned is that it is easy for us to make demands, but if some of those demands violate the digirights acts, it will be these guys, fullfilling our demands, taking the fall. So before, asking them to do it for you, try to do it by yourself first... ;)

uhm, how would that be violating 'digital rights'?

Microsoft have implemented unattended installations into the XP install procedure to allow people to install custom applications during the WinXP install - This is all you'd be doing.

As far as making an unattended install to automatically download and install the latest version of AutoPatcher, the main idea is that you can be fully up to date before you connect to the Internet, because un-patched, you're vulnerable.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hello to everyone

I recently reinstalled winxp and windows update does not work anymore.

After some investigation I discovered and downloaded Autopatcher.

I don't have an icon on the desktop. When I double click the Autopatcher icon from c/autopatcher... nothing happens :cry:

I don't have an c/autopatcher/tools nor bin folder as suggested in the tips above.

I don't have the comdlg32.ocx in c/windows32 but I have a comdlg32.dll

Can anyone help?

@mercatoros

*re-written*

1) check your autopatcher download isnt corrupt like M2Ys4U suggested.

2) find out the solution to fixing winupdate, i've heard of it before, and im sure theres a solution.

3) even if you dont want to reinstall windows to try and solve issues your your seeing, consider doing it because your new installaiton could already be compromsed, in the time youve spent online downloading autopatcher.

if you go for a reinstall again:

1) backup autopatcher so your not exposed while downloading it

2) if your xp install disk does not have sp2 included, download it from here and back that up along with autopatcher.

3) backup your programs and data

3) re-install windows properly (recreating partitions*), install sp2 if not integrated in you install disk, install and run autopatcher.

* some people end up just reinstalling windows over the previus version rather than wiping the current verison and starting afresh because they dont follow the correct procedure. if you delete and recreate the partitions in the partition table before the formatting and installing stage, you make sure this doesnt happen!

Edited by TheBlazingAngel

In the italian release (full) for an user with original XP SP2 unfortunately is given following runtime error n. 5 (routine calling or argument not valid):

http://www.calio.it/errore5.jpg

The folder of autopatcher is in c:\programmi\autopatcher (default folder).

What is it possible to do?

@Massimiliano2

could you translate that error to english for me?

im really not sure wht it could be. it might be specific to a particular module, you might have to do some experimenting with selections to find it if it is.

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

Is it possible to copy the installed veriosn of AP onto a CD or USB stick and run directly from there rather than installing on each machine?

Also can I create a new default selection list that will only include what I want to be installed by default? If so will it ignore updates that I have selected but is already installed on the machine?

I think AP is awesome, saves so much time, reliable and always to hand. It put windows updates to shame, Keep up the excellent work!

Thx!

-Blimey

^ yes, just copy the contents of c:\program files\autopatcher to the cd/dvd or flash drive.

yes, saving lists are detailed here.

if a module is already installed then it will be deselected and not installed i believe. but i cant be 100% certain. you'd have to check for yourself, create a selection file, then run autopatcher with it to see what happens (not in silent mode!!).

  • 1 month later...

OK, here's my question(s) about autopatcher and I'm a newb to this utility but not a newb to computers or haxing.

1) Does autopatcher work "just" like the MS update? I personally don't like the way MS updates my system and stores the $uninstall information as it just eats up hard drive space with no benefit to me.

2) What is the difference between using autopatcher vs something like nlite that merges the information into the install CD for a smaller installation? Please don't reply with the obvious - well, one requires 2 steps and the other requires 1 ;D. I'd like to know what the difference is when the installs are complete in terms of HD space and registry entries. I'm partial to nlite because it removes the obsolete exe and dll files and replaces them with new ones without taking any more HD space.

In other words, I like the way nlite works but this is much easier for the end user if the results are the same but I find it hard to believe that the results would be the same since all the PR claims it to be an easier way to do MS Updates - which isn't the best way to do updates to begin with.

Just to be clear - I think the package is AWESOME but I want to use the best tool for the job and I'm trying to see what the difference is between this and slipstreaming the updates to the ISO as a final result.

Edited by enmane

Basically, Autopatcher contains exactly the same files as you'll download from Windows Update, but just executes them all in order.

It's basically just an offline Windows Update (+ some other handy programs and tweaks).

I'd personally suggest doing it the WU/AP way as it's the way MS wants you to patch up.

  M2Ys4U said:

I'd personally suggest doing it the WU/AP way as it's the way MS wants you to patch up.

uh, isn't that a good reason NOT to do it that way, LOL. If MS stands behind it then it CAN'T be right, LOL.

What about the additional files left on the computer after the installation? This irritates the heck out of me.

It's amazing how linux does this so well (w/apt-get & synaptic) without any troubles nor any wasted space - when is MS going to learn?

  enmane said:

uh, isn't that a good reason NOT to do it that way, LOL. If MS stands behind it then it CAN'T be right, LOL.

What about the additional files left on the computer after the installation? This irritates the heck out of me.

It's amazing how linux does this so well (w/apt-get & synaptic) without any troubles nor any wasted space - when is MS going to learn?

:sleep: Yes, because if MS designs a way to update their own OS is has to be wrong doesn't it?

Those files are there for a reason - if you wish to uninstall the updates!

You do not have to have the uninstall/backup files there if you do not wish, just unckeck the keep backups box -_-

  M2Ys4U said:

:sleep: Yes, because if MS designs a way to update their own OS is has to be wrong doesn't it?

Those files are there for a reason - if you wish to uninstall the updates!

You do not have to have the uninstall/backup files there if you do not wish, just unckeck the keep backups box -_-

That would only be logical but this is MS we're talking about and when you download an update that says "cannot be uninstalled" there is still an $ntuninstall created.

In fact, I have 6 of these on my system right now and going to add/remove programs shows NOTHING with regards to these updates nor a way to uninstall them.

Either MS is wrong in creating an $NTuninstall folder for things that can't be uninstalled, your knowledge of why they are there is incorrect, or I my knowledge about how to uninstall them is wrong.

On another note, why would anyone uninstall an update that is supposed to fix their system/secure their system/patch their system?

If the answer is "because sometimes the MS updates mess things up" then we've already answered the question about the competency of MS and their updates, ;D

Yes, and *nix app upgrades never screw anything up...

I'm a fan of apt-get & portage as much as the next man, but Microsoft has chosen to do what they've done, and having a mechanism to uninstall a hotfix in case of conflicts is a wise choice IMO.

  M2Ys4U said:

Yes, and *nix app upgrades never screw anything up...

I'm a fan of apt-get & portage as much as the next man, but Microsoft has chosen to do what they've done, and having a mechanism to uninstall a hotfix in case of conflicts is a wise choice IMO.

Ok, without getting too sidetracked. I'm not saying that *nix is the best out there but that there is a problem with the argument being made

1) that the $ntuninstall files are there to uninstall

2) that they aren't in add/remove so that they _cannot_ be uninstalled

So, can they or can't they and if not, then why have them at all? Are we on the same page now?

Anyhow, why would they hide the ability to uninstall the updates from the user? By default, hidden files are not visible. My issue with MS is that their intentions may be well placed but their execution is pretty poor. If they are there so that we can uninstall them then list it in the add/remove section of the CP. If you think that they shouldn't be removed because it is needed and is therefore "uninstallable" like the download says then don't put it there and test the crap out of it before you send it to me otherwise make it easy for me to remove.

Edited by enmane
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I know with my isp they will only support certain models. You might want to check with them,
    • Steam Summer Sale 2025 is here offering weeks of massive discounts for PC gamers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe It is time to jump into another Steam Summer Sale. The 2025 edition of the yearly massive sale at the biggest PC gaming store on the market has just kicked off, and it is touting thousands of discounts for everything from the oldest classics to the newest releases and everything in between. The Steam servers predictably wobbled for a while at the launch of the sale, but things finally seem to be calming down enough to browse the latest sales. The front page is the place to be for anyone looking for recommendations, with it putting the spotlight on fresh games every day. However, keep in mind that the discounts themselves will not be changing and will remain static throughout the sale. Some recent blockbusters like Metaphor: ReFantazio, Monster Hunter Wilds, Sid Meier's Civilization VII, Black Myth: Wukong, Call of Duty: Black Ops 6, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, Blue Prince, Kingdom Come: Deliverance II, and much more are currently discounted. Valve has also brought back the special "Deep Discounts" section, letting Steam users find the most deeply discounted games quickly straight from the front page. The page has a selection of "all-time greats" with 85% to 95% cuts to their standard prices. This time, it includes titles like Black Mesa, Little Nightmares II, Kerbal Space Program, Steins Gate, Furi, Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, Star Wars Battlefront II, Robocop Rogue City, and much more for just a few dollars each. As for the duration, the Steam Summer Sale of 2025 will be open for business until July 10, giving all of you two whole weeks to try and keep your wallets closed tight. As always, be sure to read our Weekend PC Game Deals special this coming Saturday to check out the biggest highlights from the sale. If you miss this store-wide promotion, Valve's next major sale will land this September as part of a new time slot for the Steam Autumn Sale. Head over here to see the complete 2025 sales roadmap for the platform.
    • Great way to get an entire physical model of the products (i.e. end users) and better market them...definitely not something I'd want on ANY of my personal devices, but can be useful in retail shops for sure.
    • Hi all. ISP pushing me from 800Mbps to  1200Mbps, however, I want to buy my own modem. Theirs have been a bit wonky, would rather just handle it myself. Data capped at 1.2TB, haven't gone over yet (although pretty close at times), paying $15 rental, some have suggested a DIY solution. Anyway, I'm in need of a few upgrades and need some suggestions. My onboard LAN is capped at 1Gbit (I219-v and a Killer E2500), choose your poison? Anyway, an add-on NIC might be in order, not sure what to go with. Then there's the modem and router. A lot of these modems are very close in price, some supporting 2.3 - 2.5Gbit, others a flat 1Gbit that wouldn't let me touch my 1200Mbit that I'm paying. Boils down to a Netgear CM3000 (for below cost due to built up rewards) or Motorola B12. Then of course, there's my router. I bought a Nighthawk X10 a while ago for $10 at thrift, before this whole upgrade thing came up. Its ports are capped at 1Gbit, but it DOES have a 10Gbit SFP+ port. I could possibly get a NIC that has sfp+ port, or a switch that has 2.5Gbit ports. I'm the only wired PC in the house, everything else is wifi, no foreseeable new wired connections in the far off future. Or, I could get an RS100 router that would let me use my 1200Mbit connection. I've been subscribed for about 6 years, so have paid about $1080 in rental since then. It's too bad I didn't DIY since the beginning, it would have been paid of long ago -_- better late than never I guess. What's your thought on this?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      TheRingmaster earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      Kavin25 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pcdoctorsnet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      552
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      180
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      147
    5. 5
      Som
      119
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!