FAQ / Common Problems & Solutions


Recommended Posts

Concerning the trust issue... TRUST NO ONE :D :laughing my ass off:

Not such a bad idea on slipstreaming AP into XP, but alas there are some copyright and digital rights to be taken into account when considering such ideas. :yes:

What I learned is that it is easy for us to make demands, but if some of those demands violate the digirights acts, it will be these guys, fullfilling our demands, taking the fall. So before, asking them to do it for you, try to do it by yourself first... ;)

uhm, how would that be violating 'digital rights'?

Microsoft have implemented unattended installations into the XP install procedure to allow people to install custom applications during the WinXP install - This is all you'd be doing.

As far as making an unattended install to automatically download and install the latest version of AutoPatcher, the main idea is that you can be fully up to date before you connect to the Internet, because un-patched, you're vulnerable.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hello to everyone

I recently reinstalled winxp and windows update does not work anymore.

After some investigation I discovered and downloaded Autopatcher.

I don't have an icon on the desktop. When I double click the Autopatcher icon from c/autopatcher... nothing happens :cry:

I don't have an c/autopatcher/tools nor bin folder as suggested in the tips above.

I don't have the comdlg32.ocx in c/windows32 but I have a comdlg32.dll

Can anyone help?

@mercatoros

*re-written*

1) check your autopatcher download isnt corrupt like M2Ys4U suggested.

2) find out the solution to fixing winupdate, i've heard of it before, and im sure theres a solution.

3) even if you dont want to reinstall windows to try and solve issues your your seeing, consider doing it because your new installaiton could already be compromsed, in the time youve spent online downloading autopatcher.

if you go for a reinstall again:

1) backup autopatcher so your not exposed while downloading it

2) if your xp install disk does not have sp2 included, download it from here and back that up along with autopatcher.

3) backup your programs and data

3) re-install windows properly (recreating partitions*), install sp2 if not integrated in you install disk, install and run autopatcher.

* some people end up just reinstalling windows over the previus version rather than wiping the current verison and starting afresh because they dont follow the correct procedure. if you delete and recreate the partitions in the partition table before the formatting and installing stage, you make sure this doesnt happen!

Edited by TheBlazingAngel

In the italian release (full) for an user with original XP SP2 unfortunately is given following runtime error n. 5 (routine calling or argument not valid):

http://www.calio.it/errore5.jpg

The folder of autopatcher is in c:\programmi\autopatcher (default folder).

What is it possible to do?

@Massimiliano2

could you translate that error to english for me?

im really not sure wht it could be. it might be specific to a particular module, you might have to do some experimenting with selections to find it if it is.

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

Is it possible to copy the installed veriosn of AP onto a CD or USB stick and run directly from there rather than installing on each machine?

Also can I create a new default selection list that will only include what I want to be installed by default? If so will it ignore updates that I have selected but is already installed on the machine?

I think AP is awesome, saves so much time, reliable and always to hand. It put windows updates to shame, Keep up the excellent work!

Thx!

-Blimey

^ yes, just copy the contents of c:\program files\autopatcher to the cd/dvd or flash drive.

yes, saving lists are detailed here.

if a module is already installed then it will be deselected and not installed i believe. but i cant be 100% certain. you'd have to check for yourself, create a selection file, then run autopatcher with it to see what happens (not in silent mode!!).

  • 1 month later...

OK, here's my question(s) about autopatcher and I'm a newb to this utility but not a newb to computers or haxing.

1) Does autopatcher work "just" like the MS update? I personally don't like the way MS updates my system and stores the $uninstall information as it just eats up hard drive space with no benefit to me.

2) What is the difference between using autopatcher vs something like nlite that merges the information into the install CD for a smaller installation? Please don't reply with the obvious - well, one requires 2 steps and the other requires 1 ;D. I'd like to know what the difference is when the installs are complete in terms of HD space and registry entries. I'm partial to nlite because it removes the obsolete exe and dll files and replaces them with new ones without taking any more HD space.

In other words, I like the way nlite works but this is much easier for the end user if the results are the same but I find it hard to believe that the results would be the same since all the PR claims it to be an easier way to do MS Updates - which isn't the best way to do updates to begin with.

Just to be clear - I think the package is AWESOME but I want to use the best tool for the job and I'm trying to see what the difference is between this and slipstreaming the updates to the ISO as a final result.

Edited by enmane

Basically, Autopatcher contains exactly the same files as you'll download from Windows Update, but just executes them all in order.

It's basically just an offline Windows Update (+ some other handy programs and tweaks).

I'd personally suggest doing it the WU/AP way as it's the way MS wants you to patch up.

  M2Ys4U said:

I'd personally suggest doing it the WU/AP way as it's the way MS wants you to patch up.

uh, isn't that a good reason NOT to do it that way, LOL. If MS stands behind it then it CAN'T be right, LOL.

What about the additional files left on the computer after the installation? This irritates the heck out of me.

It's amazing how linux does this so well (w/apt-get & synaptic) without any troubles nor any wasted space - when is MS going to learn?

  enmane said:

uh, isn't that a good reason NOT to do it that way, LOL. If MS stands behind it then it CAN'T be right, LOL.

What about the additional files left on the computer after the installation? This irritates the heck out of me.

It's amazing how linux does this so well (w/apt-get & synaptic) without any troubles nor any wasted space - when is MS going to learn?

:sleep: Yes, because if MS designs a way to update their own OS is has to be wrong doesn't it?

Those files are there for a reason - if you wish to uninstall the updates!

You do not have to have the uninstall/backup files there if you do not wish, just unckeck the keep backups box -_-

  M2Ys4U said:

:sleep: Yes, because if MS designs a way to update their own OS is has to be wrong doesn't it?

Those files are there for a reason - if you wish to uninstall the updates!

You do not have to have the uninstall/backup files there if you do not wish, just unckeck the keep backups box -_-

That would only be logical but this is MS we're talking about and when you download an update that says "cannot be uninstalled" there is still an $ntuninstall created.

In fact, I have 6 of these on my system right now and going to add/remove programs shows NOTHING with regards to these updates nor a way to uninstall them.

Either MS is wrong in creating an $NTuninstall folder for things that can't be uninstalled, your knowledge of why they are there is incorrect, or I my knowledge about how to uninstall them is wrong.

On another note, why would anyone uninstall an update that is supposed to fix their system/secure their system/patch their system?

If the answer is "because sometimes the MS updates mess things up" then we've already answered the question about the competency of MS and their updates, ;D

Yes, and *nix app upgrades never screw anything up...

I'm a fan of apt-get & portage as much as the next man, but Microsoft has chosen to do what they've done, and having a mechanism to uninstall a hotfix in case of conflicts is a wise choice IMO.

  M2Ys4U said:

Yes, and *nix app upgrades never screw anything up...

I'm a fan of apt-get & portage as much as the next man, but Microsoft has chosen to do what they've done, and having a mechanism to uninstall a hotfix in case of conflicts is a wise choice IMO.

Ok, without getting too sidetracked. I'm not saying that *nix is the best out there but that there is a problem with the argument being made

1) that the $ntuninstall files are there to uninstall

2) that they aren't in add/remove so that they _cannot_ be uninstalled

So, can they or can't they and if not, then why have them at all? Are we on the same page now?

Anyhow, why would they hide the ability to uninstall the updates from the user? By default, hidden files are not visible. My issue with MS is that their intentions may be well placed but their execution is pretty poor. If they are there so that we can uninstall them then list it in the add/remove section of the CP. If you think that they shouldn't be removed because it is needed and is therefore "uninstallable" like the download says then don't put it there and test the crap out of it before you send it to me otherwise make it easy for me to remove.

Edited by enmane
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Let's see how long this lasts. In the end, it comes down to productivity lost because of workflow disruptions. It's not even a question of "which is better", rather how painful will it be to switch and it's hard enough for a single person to switch - imagine an entire city's bureaucracy. Remember, there are governmental system in the US that are still using 5.25" floppy disks... Having been involved in these kinds of swaps, I can tell you - it's never as easy as the fanbase thinks it is.
    • Right, saw it in the microsoft blog, wasn't mentioned in the article, thanks.
    • Multiple internal and external HDDs from Seagate, Western Digital are now at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon and Newegg are currently offering substantial discounts on a wide selection of internal and external hard drives from Seagate and Western Digital, with prices reduced across multiple capacities. The 4TB WD Purple Surveillance is a 3.5-inch SATA III drive offering sustained transfer rates of up to 175MB/s. It employs Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) with a 256MB cache buffer. The drive operates reliably between 0°C and 65°C and can be stored in temperatures ranging from –40°C to 70°C. Western Digital backs this unit with a three-year limited warranty as well. 4TB WD Purple Surveillance Internal HDD: $84.41 (Amazon US) - 8% off The 6TB WD Blue is also a 3.5-inch internal hard drive that connects via SATA III (6Gb/s) and delivers sustained transfer rates of up to 185MB/s. It spins at 5,400 RPM, employs Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) technology, and features a 256MB cache buffer. The drive operates reliably in temperatures from 0°C to 60°C (with safe storage down to –40°C and up to 70°C). It is backed by a two-year limited manufacturer’s warranty. 6TB WD Blue PC Internal HDD: $99.99 (Amazon US) - 17% off The 10TB WD Red Pro NAS drive comes in a 3.5-inch form factor and connects via SATA III (6Gb/s). It sustains transfer speeds of up to 267MB/s thanks to its 7,200 RPM spindle and 512MB cache buffer, and employs Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) for reliable multi-drive operation. It operates safely between 0°C and 65°C, can be stored or transported in temperatures from –40°C to 70°C, and is covered by Western Digital’s five-year limited warranty. 10TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal HDD: $237.49 (Amazon US) - 15% off This WD Elements Desktop external hard drive offers a 14TB of storage via a USB 3.0 interface (up to 5Gb/s), using a USB Micro-B connector that is backward-compatible with USB 2.0. It operates reliably between 5°C and 35°C and can be stored in temperatures ranging from –20°C to 65°C. The drive is powered by an external adapter and carries a two-year limited warranty. 14TB WD Elements Desktop External HDD: $199.99 (Amazon US) - 31% off The 16TB Seagate Expansion Desktop external hard drive delivers vast storage capacity in a simple, plug-and-play design. USB 3.0 connectivity provides high-speed data transfer rates. Out of the box, the Expansion Desktop model is recognised automatically by Windows, macOS, and ChromeOS systems. If you wish to use Apple’s Time Machine backup utility, the drive must be reformatted to the HFS+ file system. 16TB Seagate Expansion Desktop External HDD: $229.99 (Newegg) - 30% off The 16TB WD Elements desktop external HDD connects via a USB 3.0 interface using a Micro-B cable (up to 5Gb/s.) The drive features plug-and-play functionality, working straight out of the box with Windows PCs. It operates reliably in ambient temperatures from 5°C to 35°C and can be stored in temperatures ranging from –20°C to 65°C. The drive comes with a 2-year limited warranty as well. 16TB WD Elements Desktop External HDD: $249.99 + $20 off promo code SAAET2384 = 229.99 (Newegg) The 16TB Seagate BarraCuda 3.5-inch internal HDD offers Multi-Tier Caching Technology (MTC) which balances NAND flash, DRAM, and media cache layers to accelerate application launches, reduce load times, and maintain consistently high sustained read/write speeds. The included Seagate DiscWizard software simplifies drive migration, cloning, partitioning, and backup tasks. The drive is covered by a two-year limited warranty. 16TB Seagate BarraCuda Internal HDD: $194.99 (Newegg) - 7% off The 20TB Seagate Exos X20 delivers an enterprise-class solution for high-density storage environments and data centres. It offers a sustained sequential transfer rate of up to 285MB/s and advanced caching to ensure low-latency, repeatable response times for data-intensive workloads. It further features 550TB/year workload rating, 2.5 million-hour mean time between failures (MTBF), and five-year limited warranty. PowerChoice and PowerBalance technologies allow administrators to tailor power consumption profiles for active and idle states, reducing energy costs and cooling requirements. Hardware-based AES-256 encryption, password protection, and Seagate Secure certification safeguard sensitive data. 20TB Seagate Exos X20 Internal HDD: $379 + $50 off promo code EPET2523 = $329.99 (Newegg) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's all 1Password's fault for using it before anyone else. 🙃
    • Of course you would say that James. Mr everything Microsoft does is perfect. Mr who posts " I love it " on most articles regarding Microsoft. At least Firefox isn't a bloated pig that has an embarrassingly low market share given it's the default. Mr Microsoft evangelical James needs to learn some self awareness. It's embarrassing for you to criticize any browser give your worship of Edge.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Mighty Pen went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      emptyother earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      DarkWun earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      valkyr09 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      562
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      175
    4. 4
      Xenon
      116
    5. 5
      Som
      109
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!