Macworld 2006 Discussion


Recommended Posts

As many times as they have been declared dead over the years, I don't blame them for being a little arrogant.

Whats really ironic is the fact that they would be dead if it wasnt for M$ and right now they seem to be going to head to head against them... vista vs. OSX

ok i have decided... I am gunna buy the lower end MacBook and put an extra 512Mb ram in it. Hope im making the right descision. Ive started my MacBook fund and already have $700 in it! weeee! Now im gunna sell my dell laptop and some other stuff and maybe, just maybeeee i wont take too much of a hit on my cc next month!! :)

lucky you.....i had an x86 ibook fund but looks like thats not happening

Whats really ironic is the fact that they would be dead if it wasnt for M$ and right now they seem to be going to head to head against them... vista vs. OSX

not really, from what i can see they're not trying to compete with MS, it's the same old stuff only a different CPU inside

Whats really ironic is the fact that they would be dead if it wasnt for M$ and right now they seem to be going to head to head against them... vista vs. OSX

Apple feels like they are already on the same level as Vista. They feel like they will take it the next step with Leopard and go beyond it, before Vista even ships.

Last year i was like "WHOA" at all the new stuff, but this year, I'm barely amused, mainly because the MacBook Pro is extremely overpriced, and I don't have enough for even a low end iMac :( It's gonna take me forever to save, i was hoping for something cheap like a mac mini, o well...not even a preview of leopard, disappointing...

Last year i was like "WHOA" at all the new stuff, but this year, I'm barely amused, mainly because the MacBook Pro is extremely overpriced,

Find me a PC that is the same size, with the same options for less money. I can't find one. THere is an Acer and a Gateway that is close, but both are thicker and heavier and have less software with it.

iWork and iLife look promising...even though I'm a little wary of the marketing pitch where you HAVE to buy (<<tell me if I'm wrong)) .mac in order to use iWeb. I'm really excited about iDVD's full support of third-party burners, although I thought it was up to the third-parties to decide to make drivers for their drives or not...

PB users must be somewhat happy but for 12" PB users maybe a little disappointed.

I'm somewhat disappointed because no iBooks and no Mac Mini updates...for now. Weird how they haven't updated the product pages for those two (and other products) to include iLife/iWork 06...

Does anyone know the status of universal binaries for like Office for Mac, Pro Apps, etc?

(one more thing: iPod nano/video FM tuner = sweet).

iWork and iLife look promising...even though I'm a little wary of the marketing pitch where you HAVE to buy (<<tell me if I'm wrong)) .mac in order to use iWeb.

Are we sure about that? Surely there is a way to set iWeb to upload to your site if you already have your own hosting, even without all of the functionality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!