[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

>0.7.2a(05/04/2006): Fixed a few errors I made while refactoring, improve the documentation, update Tangerine to 0.10.

thanks for the update!

Yeah, there was a minor minor update. If you already had the shell32.dll script from earlier this week, or you feel like staring at the documentation for a bit (which I did when I was tired, so there's grammatical errors :(), there's not really much to grab it for, unless you're just a stickler for having the absolute latest point releases, or like murdering DeviantArt's bandwidth.
Perhaps consider a link to this Tango icon pack for the extras?

Sure. Interesting choice of first post, welcome to NW :)
Jesus christ, my computer officially hates you. It's either that NOD32 is screwing up something, or I don't know whats going on.
I think "Try it in safe mode." is going to be my new shot-in-the-dark snake-oil panacea catch-phrase, since doing that eliminates oh-so-many variables, and I think partially neuters Windows File Protection. The shareware version of NOD32 doesn't give me any grief, FWIW. I think your computer just hates me :cry:

Oh wow... then it's something else on my computer that never lets it install. Does anyone know if IconPackager will break it maybe? But then again, I reverted the icons back to default XP ones before installing the pack.. Oh well, I guess I'l just wait for a real installer/uninstaller.

Oh wow... then it's something else on my computer that never lets it install. Does anyone know if IconPackager will break it maybe? But then again, I reverted the icons back to default XP ones before installing the pack.. Oh well, I guess I'l just wait for a real installer/uninstaller.

Yeah mine wouldn't let me install for some reason too until I did a reformat. Everytime I ran the patch the Windows error for replacing certain files didn't pop up. But after the reformat they popped up like no tomorrow haha and it worked like a charm :yes:

@celdamage: IconPackager won't affect the system file modification in any way, but it will affect what gets displayed. I wouldn't hold your breath too long for a real installer, I've been too busy to really work on it myself. GUIReplacer 3.0 might be pretty nice, though, if you don't mind the .NET framework.

@archan9el: Interesting effect! I do have a tendency to reformat my desktop every 2-4 months (restoring from an activated image), if only as an excuse to play with the latest release of Vista or Ubuntu, my other test machines are clean VMs and a laptop that doesn't get mucked with much, so I can't claim to test on installs that've led a full life, so to speak.

@celdamage: IconPackager won't affect the system file modification in any way, but it will affect what gets displayed. I wouldn't hold your breath too long for a real installer, I've been too busy to really work on it myself. GUIReplacer 3.0 might be pretty nice, though, if you don't mind the .NET framework.

@archan9el: Interesting effect! I do have a tendency to reformat my desktop every 2-4 months (restoring from an activated image), if only as an excuse to play with the latest release of Vista or Ubuntu, my other test machines are clean VMs and a laptop that doesn't get mucked with much, so I can't claim to test on installs that've led a full life, so to speak.

Restoring from an activated image is a good strategy especially good for ppl doing DIY themselves. I used to do the image after M$ Windows and Office activation but prior to installation any other drivers and software. By doing so, I only need four CDs for a True Image exercise.

@celdamage: IconPackager won't affect the system file modification in any way, but it will affect what gets displayed. I wouldn't hold your breath too long for a real installer, I've been too busy to really work on it myself. GUIReplacer 3.0 might be pretty nice, though, if you don't mind the .NET framework.

I hope the guy that runs the Gui Replacer site fixes it soon. Looks like it's been hacked.

@archan9el: Interesting effect! I do have a tendency to reformat my desktop every 2-4 months (restoring from an activated image), if only as an excuse to play with the latest release of Vista or Ubuntu, my other test machines are clean VMs and a laptop that doesn't get mucked with much, so I can't claim to test on installs that've led a full life, so to speak.

I should also mention this Windows was already built into my Sony VAIO laptop. The reformat removed the OEM version in place of a totally new fresh install of the whole system, much like a breath of fresh air free of pollutants (Sony Crapware).

I hope the guy that runs the Gui Replacer site fixes it soon. Looks like it's been hacked.

The forum site isn't an official site by any means... Shacal.com, the site of the guy who actually maintains GUIR, is clean. Of course, I say this just as my ISP suspended darkt.net for me having accidentally created a spam relay :pinch:
If you don't want the start menu button to get the shoes what do i have to put in the override folder?
Put Bitmap #176 (for Windows Classic) and/or Bitmap #143 (for Luna) in the res_tweaked/explorer.exe folder... override is for stuff you've reshacked manually, or stuff that isn't the normal Windows version of a file. It's explorer.exe, of course.
No. Windows 2000 does not support alpha transparency. :(
I've a conversation with Dobey, who's suggested that I go ahead and make some non-alphablended icons, which would display properly on Win2k. I don't know if I want to support win2k in any capacity, though... it doesn't always use the same resources in the same places, and I haven't been able to get file replacement to work reliably on it. Not... that I have on XP, either.
what the commands to replace my shell32.dll !!! i crashed and rebooted and i get an error saying the shell32.dll is bad anyone help me out
You'll probably need the recovery console to fix that, I'm afraid shell32 is used for the logon process, but if safe mode + command prompt works, that would work too. In the recovery console, cd to change directories, dir to list their contents, and then copy should be all you need to copy a backup shell32 to the live system.

After you find a good backup (if you've been using my patcher, the "original" subdirectory of it would be a good place to check), just copy it to system32 as such, "copy shell32.dll c:\windows\system32" and let it replace. If system file protection tries to stop you, copy it to c:\windows\system32\dllcache too.

I hope this is enough for you to go on!

The forum site isn't an official site by any means... Shacal.com, the site of the guy who actually maintains GUIR, is clean. Of course, I say this just as my ISP suspended darkt.net for me having accidentally created a spam relay :pinch:Put Bitmap #176 (for Windows Classic) and/or Bitmap #143 (for Luna) in the res_tweaked/explorer.exe folder... override is for stuff you've reshacked manually, or stuff that isn't the normal Windows version of a file. It's explorer.exe, of course.I've a conversation with Dobey, who's suggested that I go ahead and make some non-alphablended icons, which would display properly on Win2k. I don't know if I want to support win2k in any capacity, though... it doesn't always use the same resources in the same places, and I haven't been able to get file replacement to work reliably on it. Not... that I have on XP, either.You'll probably need the recovery console to fix that, I'm afraid shell32 is used for the logon process, but if safe mode + command prompt works, that would work too. In the recovery console, cd to change directories, dir to list their contents, and then copy should be all you need to copy a backup shell32 to the live system.

After you find a good backup (if you've been using my patcher, the "original" subdirectory of it would be a good place to check), just copy it to system32 as such, "copy shell32.dll c:\windows\system32" and let it replace. If system file protection tries to stop you, copy it to c:\windows\system32\dllcache too.

I hope this is enough for you to go on!

i cant get in to safe to safe with command promt

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!