[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

Hey Vert, do we get an Xmas edition? ;-)
Possibly... but the only things that'd be "in" would be:
  1. Those silly little cards, but only if I've finished them.
  2. Support for Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs (which I absolutely love, except if I've seen it, I'm obviously a dirty software pirate because normal people like me aren't allowed to see Windows without the full IE/OE/MSN/WMP/etc eXPerience, so I shall therefore disavow all knowledge of it, immediately)
  3. I'm splitting the OS and Applications bits into two seperate installers, so they can be updated independently. The Application patcher would also work on Vista, whereas the OS patcher would need reengineering and a new set of reshack scripts, in addition to someone buying me a copy of Vista.
  4. To really be a "Christmas Edition," wouldn't it need something... Christmassy? Nothing really comes to mind :/ Christmas-themed icons, I guess?

Yes, I have not seen WF4LP either... Even though it is not installed on my "server" box. Yeah. That would be nice addition

A hacked-solitaire would also be an extraordinary December STTP.

I personally do not like the idea of splitting apps / OS... but hey.. its your patcher ;)

A Christmas edition doesn't seem exactly an A+ idea if you ask me :p

Edited by bobp

Yes, I have not seen WF4LP either... Even though it is not installed on my "server" box. Yeah. That would be nice addition

A hacked-solitaire would also be an extraordinary December STTP.

A Christmas edition doesn't seem exactly an A+ idea if you ask me :p

With Christmas edition I meant a release around Christmas.

What the hell is WF4LP?

Forget it. I used Google. :yes:

Just about anything is better than the standard Windows icons :rofl:

But Tango is totally awesome.

I strongly agree :santa:

By the way, I just reinstalled Firefox and WiMP after applying the patch and the reloader patched everything again just fine. Was this supposed to be an issue? The new computer is so cool, too. I LOVE Gina :devil:

@Sooper: It's only a problem if they weren't installed originally - the files wouldn't be there, and the reloader doesn't touch files that weren't there before. I'm thinking about tweaking that behavior, but my thoughts are less of a tweak and more of an overhaul.

@Edwin: Yeah, WF4LP doesn't have WFP (at all), and attempting to disable it causes that BSOD. I commented it out to get it working on my copy, but I think I found a registry entry for a reliable check. I went back to Legit XP Pro on my main machine, though, so I'll probably sit on it a bit longer.

@BobP: I'm not entirely enthusiastic about splitting 'em apart, myself (and having another set of files full of code) but in a few ways it does make sense. One of those, Vista support for the non-OS bits, is really kinda silly, I guess, if there's no OS-bits patcher :p

I'm going to be doing a minor suspension overhaul on my car this weekend, so that's likely a nyet to a quick December with Cards and the WF4LP check. I guess I oughtta fix OOo2.1 and Acrobat8, wow I'm lazy :p

Edited by vertigosity

Hi Vertigosity !

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoDevelopment

[drooling]

Check this out, free fedora-icon-project (like Tango) .... very sexy :yes:

How about (in the future, maybe next year) a Fedora-Project-Patcher :heart:

[stop drooling]

Hi Vertigosity !

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoDevelopment

[drooling]

Check this out, free fedora-icon-project (like Tango) .... very sexy :yes:

How about (in the future, maybe next year) a Fedora-Project-Patcher :heart:

[stop drooling]

Eh, for some reason they don't look as good as some of the other atr things I've seen the Fedora team come up with. They are still good though! Watch Vergy say no to the patcher because he doesn't feel like it or something heh :p

Speaking of which, Vertigosity, are you working on your webpage? It looks like it is under construction or something ;). I think I'm going to throw together some Industrial and Gnome shell icons for everyone because we need them. Not now or soon but eventually. Is that okay?

Oh, and while I'm thinking about it, there are some wicked cool OpenOffice icons on the Tango Fridays page that I want. All I have to do is take those icons and place them in the right order using something like IconWorkshop, right? Sorry for the stupid question in advance.

Edited by SooperDoode

Oh, and while I'm thinking about it, there are some wicked cool OpenOffice icons on the Tango Fridays page that I want. All I have to do is take those icons and place them in the right order using something like IconWorkshop, right? Sorry for the stupid question in advance.

Wow, I've never seen any of those icons before. The Celestia icon is awesome!

celestia.png

How would I go about converting this to ICO? I'm new to the whole icon making/converting thing :blush:

Hm. I don't like 'em really. Too pale and I rather dislike that isometric view on everything. Hell, reminds me of BeOS ><

Actually, it looks like some kind of twisted brainchild between Vista icons and BeOS ones :D

Edited by Punio4
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!