[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

Hey, anybody got a tango e-mail icon where the envelope is closed (and no reply/forward arrows etc)?

Tried search and the only semi-useful thing I got was vertigosity telling another memmber that there aren't many variations of the e-mail icon available.

Hey, anybody got a tango e-mail icon where the envelope is closed (and no reply/forward arrows etc)?

Tried search and the only semi-useful thing I got was vertigosity telling another memmber that there aren't many variations of the e-mail icon available.

post-140748-1212421392.png

mail_notification.ico

For anybody who wants (better) Tangoized OpenOffice, Novell has a fork of it with gnome/industrial icons pre-built (among other actual bullet-point-able features). I'm actually considering dropping STTP support for stock OOo in favor of it (one less thing for me to maintain). Thoughts?

http://go-oo.org/discover

For anybody who wants (better) Tangoized OpenOffice, Novell has a fork of it with gnome/industrial icons pre-built (among other actual bullet-point-able features). I'm actually considering dropping STTP support for stock OOo in favor of it (one less thing for me to maintain). Thoughts?

http://go-oo.org/discover

AFAIK the Tango icons are included with OOo since version 2.4?

AFAIK the Tango icons are included with OOo since version 2.4?
The toolbar icons are available but not on by default (they are in Gooo), but Gooo actually has the app icons (ie, the stuff that STTP would be covering as well). Well, most of them. Some of them have some kind of odd but appropriate Tango/XP-style-guideline-hybrid icons.

I feel like a complete arse for having this be my first post on Neowin, so I'll apologize now. I'M SORRY!

I tried to do searches via Google and this thread, but I couldn't find any links to 7.08 or 7.08.1. Does anybody know of any available around the internets?

Although I think my search might be pointless after scanning this thread; my reason for wanting to download a prior version was the fact certain items didn't seem to be skinned after installing the latest version, but it sounds like that might be an SP3 issue and not a 7.08.2 issue. If that's the case, please feel free to ignore this.

Thanks in advance y'all! :D

Although I think my search might be pointless after scanning this thread; my reason for wanting to download a prior version was the fact certain items didn't seem to be skinned after installing the latest version, but it sounds like that might be an SP3 issue and not a 7.08.2 issue. If that's the case, please feel free to ignore this.

Thanks in advance y'all! :D

Yeah, if you're worried about the filepicker dialogs, that's an SP3 thing. Anything else... is probably a "I haven't done it" thing :p
Yeah, if you're worried about the filepicker dialogs, that's an SP3 thing. Anything else... is probably a "I haven't done it" thing :p

Haha, yeah...the filepicker dialogs is the only item I can think of actually. Stupid SP3! Thanks a ton for all the work you've done over time on this thing though. I haven't stopped using it since I came across it.

Any plans out there to make a tango ff3 theme? The only thing keeping me from the latest release candidates are the lack of a firefox theme...

If no one else out there is going to do it, I might try my hand at it...

Tango and Gnome 2.0, https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=636662

Could you post instructions on how to add another iconset? I was interested in Oxygen. Thanks for the amazing work ...
It doesn't really have the ability to add another iconset as such, but look at the CHM documentation for "resource overloading" - that'll make it fairly simple to use KDE4's iconset for personal use, and it should also be fairly simple to make a wrapper-installer if you want to redistribute it. I'm thinking about making the source code available in the next release, but I haven't finalized that yet.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!