Luna Element 5

By em3
in Tips, Tweaks & Customization

 Share

Recommended Posts

Experienced

martin10018

Posted
Posted
^I already reported it to the dA boards. What really annoys the heck out of me is this text that he put up there: "The original visual styles are Microsoft Corporation from my windows xp os cd. I am just try to new look." He had a different text up there before, stating that the visual style was from him. I can even see that he has hidden my comment.

And he blocked me after I told him that I reported him. dA needs moderation urgently.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Yeah, I can't comment anymore either after I commented 2 times. He knows he's wrong that's why he blocks certain people. The deviation has been reported by a few people all ready so I think it will be taken down in the next couple of days.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Sorry for no response. Grab my updated winamp skin here

No problem and great work on the winamp skin! :D Will you be making a 5.1 Blue version as well?

I've found some bugs in the skin. The Medialibrary isn't updated and the Shuffle buttons etc aren't looking like the LE buttons either.

@bizarresk: He has disabled all comments. He knows that he's wrong by ripping it. Let's just hope that the dA boards will take actions soon.

Explorer

Arthur

Posted
Posted

I've been a member here for quite a while, but have made very few comments... I'm more the type that enjoys looking, reading, and smiling. However, in this case I just couldn't refrain from adding my two cents. The last comment that ~sagorpirbd makes is:

"~sagorpirbd 21 hours 44 minutes ago

'This is not Tornado5's deviation this is from Microsoft corp. I found this visual styles from my os cd. there is a other name by microsoft corp.'"

I think that he is pointing out a legal issue (in an indirect way, in broken English). If you open up any of the Luna Element "msstyles" files in, for example, Resource Hacker, and look at the last entry, which is "Version Info - 1 - 1033", you will find that the style is copywritten by Microsoft.

Now, I respect any themer's or site's wishes for people not to post unauthorized mods or rips. However, I do this out of respect for the themer, and the fact that I rather not lose the valuable services that sites like Neowin and deviantART offer me. But, as far as I can tell, ~sagorpirbd has every "legal" right to submit the style he has.

Like I said... Just my two cents.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

No he doesn't have all the rights for it. It's all be discussed in this thread several times. The person that ripped tornado5 DID NOT make the theme and DID NOT make the graphics. The only reason why the MS things are in there is because the skin is build upon Luna. If you look in other visual styles you'll see that they all have it. Does that really mean that people can just rip other people their art, only because of that?

Explorer

Arthur

Posted
Posted

Don't get me wrong. I'm all for "honoring" the artist's wishes. What I'm saying is that

~sagorpirbd has every "legal" right to do what he "supposedly" did. And yes, if an artist

does not "legally" identify a piece of work as his own, he leaves it open to others to take

advantage of his hard work. If he or she wished to, it would be very simple for a themer

to "attempt" to copywrite his or her part of an msstyle by adding the appropriate entry in

the msstyle file. However, I think that there are legal issues which prevent themers from

doing this.

Once again, I respect, and always will respect Tornado5 and other themers' requests.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^I only pointed out why the ripper didn't had those rights ;) If you open up the file with Stylebuilder you'll actually see that EM3 aka tornado5 is the "author" of the theme. So that's enough proof that the ripped doesn't have the "legal" right to modify the theme ;)

Rookie

Han_Solo

Posted
Posted
No problem and great work on the winamp skin! :D Will you be making a 5.1 Blue version as well?

I've found some bugs in the skin. The Medialibrary isn't updated and the Shuffle buttons etc aren't looking like the LE buttons either.

Oh yes, i dont use the Medialib so ive forgotten to skin it ;) About the Shuffle buttons. I tried the original one from the .mystyles but i was not happy with it. In my opinion the current match better to the Winamp Skin.

If i find some time i will fix the Medialib thing.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

It was even noticeable without applying the skin. I don't even know why the ripped keeps the ripped skin online after all those comments that where given..

@Han_Solo: Then I'll change the shuffle buttons etc for personal use when I'm going to use the Winamp skin :)

Mentor

?AK

Posted
Posted

I reported that pathetic ripper and he wrote me back that he reported me too :rofl: How bad can this world get... The funniest thing is that I think he belives what he says, f*king psycho.

PS: Cap pls make some VS for Vista too :p I'm waiting for the new XP skin also :)

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^I don't have Vista and I'm not planning on installing it anytime soon. And making MSStyles is pretty hard since it's all resource hacking. The ripped is lame by reporting people that say that he's a ripped. He wont achieve anything by doing that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft: Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 finally stops trusting a critical system threat

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft: Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 finally stops trusting a critical system threat by Sayan Sen This week Microsoft released the Patch Tuesday updates for June 2026 with KB5094126 on Windows 11 25H2, 24H2, and KB5093998 on Windows 11 23H2. On Windows 10 22H2 it's under KB5094127. Alongside the announced release notes for the new builds, Microsoft has revealed another change that is coming to Windows with these new releases. It has been confirmed that custom folders are getting a significant change with the June 2026 updates as such folders or folder names defined by desktop.ini will no longer appear after this update is successfully installed. While you may inititally think this is a bug with the new release, Microsoft has stated that this is in fact "expected behaviour" in its new support article regarding this which Neowin spotted today while browsing. Essentially it's a security hardening measure such that custom folder presentations are treated as potentially unsafe whenever Windows is not sure about their origin and whether that desktop.ini folder can be trusted or not. Here is list of such untrusted files and folders: Files downloaded from the internet that carry Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW). Files copied from certain remote locations, such as some WebDAV or HTTP-based locations. Files on network paths that are not classified as intranet or trusted by zone policy. For those who may not be familiar, Desktop.ini is a special configuration file used by Windows to customize the appearance and behavior of individual folders. Basically Windows can read specific instructions stored in Desktop.ini instead of displaying every folder with the same default settings. This can be used to apply custom icons, thumbnail images, localized folder names, and such informational tooltips (infotip). The file can also influence certain folder-specific behaviors and properties. It is typically stored as a hidden system file within a folder that has been designated to support Desktop.ini customization. However, because Windows Shell automatically reads and applies these attributes whenever a customized folder is opened, they have historically (since the Windows XP days) presented an attack surface as a result of an unchecked buffer in the Shell component responsible for extracting custom attributes from Desktop.ini files. As such an attacker could create a specially crafted Desktop.ini containing a malicious or corrupted attributes and place it on a network share. So if a user were to browse that folder, Windows would automatically process the file, potentially triggering a buffer overflow. This could allow arbitrary code to run with the same permissions as the logged-in user. Hence a seemingly harmless folder could become a security risk when their contents are not properly validated. For admins and users alike looking to manage this behaviour, Microsoft has shared a few ways. One of them is to assign a trusted mark on the folder in case you are sure of its source. Secondly a policy can be used to revert back to the previous state. Finally, the MOTW can be removed too to indicate to Windows that this is a safe file. The company explains: Option 1: Add the source to Trusted Sites (Recommended) If the affected content is stored on a known internal or managed source, add that source to the Trusted Sites list. Once the source is treated as trusted, Windows processes desktop.ini from that source normally. This keeps the protection in place for other locations and is the lower-risk option. Option 2: Use policy to restore previous behavior Organizations that need broader compatibility can enable the policy Allow the use of remote paths in file shortcut icons.Enabling this policy restores the pre-June 2026 behavior for affected remote or untrusted scenarios. Option 3: Check for and remove the Mark of the Web (MotW) If the desktop.ini file has a Mark of the Web (MotW), Windows may treat it as coming from an untrusted source and block customization. Verify whether MotW is present and, if appropriate, remove it from the desktop.ini file. This can restore expected behavior, but should only be done for trusted content, as it removes the associated security protection. To remove the MotW tag, open PowerShell and run one of the following commands: For a single desktop.ini file: Unblock-File "C:\Your\Folder\Path\desktop.ini" For all desktop.ini files in a folder: Get-ChildItem "C:\Your\Folder\Path" -Recurse -Filter desktop.ini -Force | Unblock-File Microsoft has warned though against using a broad opt-out using the provided policy as it reduces protection against potentially malicious remote folder-customization content. As such the tech giant recommends trusting only controlled internal sources and keeping trust settings as strict as possible. You can check out the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • LAV Filters 0.82.0

      By Copernic · Posted

      LAV Filters 0.82.0 by Razvan Serea LAVFSplitter is a multi-format media splitter that uses libavformat (the demuxing library from ffmpeg) to demux all sorts of media files. LAV Splitter is a Souce Filter/Splitter required to demux the files into their separate elementary streams. LAV Audio and Video Decoder are powerful decoders with a focus on quality and performance, without any compromises. Supported Formats: MKV/WebM, AVI, MP4/MOV, MPEG-TS/PS (including basic EVO support), FLV, OGG, and many more that are supported by ffmpeg! LAV Filters are based on ffmpeg and libbluray and is aimed to offer a all-around solution to perfect playback of file-based Media as well as Blu-rays. LAV Filters 0.82.0 changelog: LAV Splitter NEW: Support for demuxing Dolby Vision Enhancement Layer streams NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: When demuxing Blu-ray discs, Dolby Vision metadata is available on the primary video stream LAV Video NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: Hardware decoding support for DVDs has been removed Download: LAV Filters 0.82.0 | 15.5 MB (Open Source) View: LAV Filters Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft wants to end printer driver headaches with Windows Ready Print

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      what was the right topic?
    • Big Tech is turning you into a digital tenant, but there is a way to give them notice

      By davesickofenshittification · Posted

      the very thing im sick of :-)
    • EU Commission explains why Siri AI isn't launching in the EU, and Apple is to blame

      By monterxz · Posted

      For some reason when EU forced Microsoft to allow users to change the default browser and search provider in Windows (also no ads for Office and the likes) - it was good. But when it comes to Apple - then it's bad. BTW, Apple would have gone out of business if Microsoft wasn't pressed by US government several decades ago. 😉

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      207
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      79
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!