Super Bowl Vote Time!


Super Bowl Winners  

263 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is going to win the Super Bowl?

    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      159
    • Seattle Seahawks
      98
    • Referees
      6


Recommended Posts

I was rooting for Pitt but yeah that offensive pass interference call that negated the TD was EXTREMELY questionable (I'm trying to be polite). Like they siad, Michael Irvin made a living doing that. Plus BOTH guys had their arms extended. The Reothlisberger TD, I think they made the wrong call on the field but that the video evidence wasn't conclusive enough to overturn. I thought his left arm obscured the ball and you couldn't really tell how close it got becuase he definitely did get pushed back. So no matter what the call on the field was it should ahve been upheld but I think they made the wrong call. And that penatly on Hasselbeck WAS terrible. While they were in commerical after that I was saying to my dad, "What were they tlaking about? He was trying to tackle the dude not block someone!" Bad call.

With all that said I think Seattle gave that game away. Brown's 2 missed FGs, and the AWFUL clock management at the end of both halves was disgusting.

I'm glad Pitt won though. They were my pick and I wanted to see Bettis retire with the trophy and Cowher finally get his. Well it took New England, Indy, and Carolina all getting knocked out for me to get to rooting for Pitt but nonetheless. lol

Like I said earlier...and I'll say it again...statistics don't mean anything in the Superbowl, and I was proved right with the Steelers winning. The Superbowl is a whole different game. Anyways, way to go Steelers!! And on another note, I was expecting a higher scoring game. Also, the worst thing now is that we'll have to deal about Seahawk fans complaining about an unfair game. They never are in the playoffs...and I didn't think this one was bad at all, there was the one questionable touchdown, but that's it.

How were you proven right? The statistics were borne out in this game.

the refs totally screwed seattle

1) the "pushoff" on seattle's first TD that was called back.. there was hardly any contact on that play

the back judge saw that pitts defender was complaing then thought for a second and threw the flag

Let me just repeat I think that was a bad call but I don't think he let the Pitt player influence him. On a few replays it looked to me like he just missed his flag on a first grab lol.

Anyone else notice the oddity of both the records that were broken by one?

Until today, longest rushing play in Super Bowl history was Marcus Allen's 74 yard romp against Washington. Parker had a 75 yarder.

Longest INT return was 75 yards and the one by Herndon was 76 yards.

If Seattle had managed a comeback it wouldv'e been by 11 points and that would have broken the old record for biggest comeback which was 10 by Dallas against Buffalo.

Don't know if anyone else noticed that or if I'm jsut an oddball. More likely the latter. lol

How were you proven right? The statistics were borne out in this game.

So you're telling me when others were saying how the stats show that Seattle has the upper hand and I said that those things don't mean anything and that Pitt will end up winning and they did.

I still don't see why you argue about that push off in the endzone, I found that he clearly was obstructing the Steeler player from having a fair chance at the pass.

And yeah, those things were weird how they broke the records by 1 yard. And Seattle played horribly at the end of both quarters. Anyways, I'm not going to bother with this anymore...the Steelers won, that's all that matters.

You want to talk about bad officiating? The Steelers dealt with it in mass numbers the whole playoffs. I think the refs made all the right calls, maybe the pushoff wasn't a good one but I'd have to know the exact rules of pushing off before I could judge. We won. STEELERS ARE CHAMPS. It's over Seattle fans!

So you're telling me when others were saying how the stats show that Seattle has the upper hand and I said that those things don't mean anything and that Pitt will end up winning and they did.

I still don't see why you argue about that push off in the endzone, I found that he clearly was obstructing the Steeler player from having a fair chance at the pass.

And yeah, those things were weird how they broke the records by 1 yard. And Seattle played horribly at the end of both quarters. Anyways, I'm not going to bother with this anymore...the Steelers won, that's all that matters.

The Seahawks did outplay the Steelers by a slight margin, just like the stats suggested.

Although, the stats aren't always right. Nothing is right 100% of the time.

Anyone else notice the oddity of both the records that were broken by one?

Until today, longest rushing play in Super Bowl history was Marcus Allen's 74 yard romp against Washington. Parker had a 75 yarder.

Longest INT return was 75 yards and the one by Herndon was 76 yards.

If Seattle had managed a comeback it wouldv'e been by 11 points and that would have broken the old record for biggest comeback which was 10 by Dallas against Buffalo.

Don't know if anyone else noticed that or if I'm jsut an oddball. More likely the latter. lol

I was shocked. Not that they were both by one yard, but that two records were broken:

Both were 75, and both are now 76. THAT'S odd.

Woooo! Go Steelers!

And while I agree that a couple of the officiating calls were bad (the Hasselbeck tackle), I'm just gonna say that it makes up for some of the crap calls against Pittsburgh during the playoffs (Polamalu interception).

No, it doesn't make up for anything. You know that saying "Two wrongs don't make a right"? Great example right there.

I am convinced after this year's post-season that the NFL "invents" penalties throughout the season. That tackle by Hasselbeck was absolute BS, I've seen that same type of tackle thousands of times and now all of a sudden it's called and Al Michaels has the exact reasoning for it? Give me a break. The refs took 2 touchdowns from the Seahawks and gave the Steelers 1. That's 21 points.

That said, Seattle killed themselves more than anything. 2 missed field goals, clock mismanagement at the ends of both halves...not to mention the commercials were crap, the halftime show was crap...blaaaaaah.

Yes, I'm bitter because the Niners suck.

No, it doesn't make up for anything. You know that saying "Two wrongs don't make a right"? Great example right there.

I am convinced after this year's post-season that the NFL "invents" penalties throughout the season. That tackle by Hasselbeck was absolute BS, I've seen that same type of tackle thousands of times and now all of a sudden it's called and Al Michaels has the exact reasoning for it? Give me a break. The refs took 2 touchdowns from the Seahawks and gave the Steelers 1. That's 21 points.

The referees did make a lot of crap up. One of the new rules is tackling a Steeler is now a personal foul.

I love how they pretended they didn't know who had the ball.

HELLO? IF THE QB IS TRYING TO MAKE A TACKLE, THE OTHER TEAM HAS POSSESSION. THUS, HE ISN'T BLOCKING. HE'S TACKLING.

If he was blocking, that would probably be a penalty, yeah. It's perfectly legal to try to tackle a defender who took possession of the ball, though. Until this game.

To be honest, I don't know what's more disturbing:

The officiating or the stupidity of Holmgren and Hasselbeck. What the hell was going on at the end of the 2nd and 4th quarters? Someone is a moron right there.

I heard the explanation for the end of the 2nd quarter (I called, he audibled, I called, he audibled), which was BCS as well. It was all extremely moronic.

Herm Edwards is renowned for his skill at screwing up time management, but even he never managed to pull something like this off.

Every year I have a contest with myself. How long can I go without knowing who is playing in the Super Bowl? Today, I made my goal of not knowing until it was over. A couple of years ago, I accidentally found out a couple of days early (Damn newspaper! Can't they keep 'sports' in the 'sports' section?) :angry:

rothlisberger's "touchdown" - he didn't break the plain of the goal-line - side judge screwed seattle over

I'm not so sure this was a bad call. We rewinded it like 100 times, and it does appear in about 2 frames on my DVR that the ball was over the white. Then he gets hit back, and then on the ground stretches for it. It was close for sure though. So close, i will say, that if they said "No TD" they may not have overturned it.

Now, Hasslebacks clipping penalty, WTF?

And, the push off should have been a penalty. I mean, it doesn't matter how "hard" you push, you cant push off at all.

I'm not so sure this was a bad call. We rewinded it like 100 times, and it does appear in about 2 frames on my DVR that the ball was over the white. Then he gets hit back, and then on the ground stretches for it. It was close for sure though. So close, i will say, that if they said "No TD" they may not have overturned it.

Now, Hasslebacks clipping penalty, WTF?

And, the push off should have been a penalty. I mean, it doesn't matter how "hard" you push, you cant push off at all.

Really? Then why not make that damn call on EVERY pass play throughout the season?

I have no issue with the penalty itself, he pushed off, fine. But don't go waiting until the biggest game of the season to start calling that garbage. EVERY SINGLE PASS PLAY SOMEONE IS TOUCHING SOMEONE ELSE. The defender didn't even move backward on the push, it didn't give Jackson any more of an advantage to the football.

And why are horsecollar tackles being called in the regular season and not the Super Bowl? Joey Porter clearly and blatantly grabbed Shaun Alexander's pads from behind and drug him down. Either make the call every time it happens or don't call it all. Consistancy...that's all we want.

Every year I have a contest with myself. How long can I go without knowing who is playing in the Super Bowl? Today, I made my goal of not knowing until it was over. A couple of years ago, I accidentally found out a couple of days early (Damn newspaper! Can't they keep 'sports' in the 'sports' section?) :angry:

dude.... your flash sig makes my CPU usage jump to 100% when it's showing... could you possible use something less animated?

I agree with you. They refs need to be more consistant. But, I think the push off did help a little. I mean, he was wide open on that TD. I didn't even see the play develop (I was getting some friend chicken. mmmm) but I saw the catch as I walked in. I was like, man, how did he get wide open? Then on the replay I saw the push off.

I did see Porter on the horsecoller tackle. My wife (who doesn't watch the much football) even said "ouch, is that even a legal tackle!" haha

dont know if thats the right topic but damn i loved it. :) i am a steeler for years now although im from germany and hell after staying awake till 12:00am, when the broadcasting started over here to 4:30am, then two hours of sleep and now sitting at damn work it was still worth it. :yes:

unfortunately i wasnt able to see the commercials, but anyways, although it wasnt the greatest game of all time, it was still very good i think. :yes: :)

hope you had a good time aswell! cheers.

Seattle got screwed for two reasons

1. Poor Decisions

2. Poor officiating

If the seahawks scored there field goals they could've won. And if the ref didnt give steelers that rothlesberger (sp?) a touchdown, seattle probably could have pullled something at the 2 min warning. There was too much pressure to get 11 points. Outrageous referee calls, ex. horse collar on Shaun Alexander..wtf?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!