Super Bowl Vote Time!


Super Bowl Winners  

263 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is going to win the Super Bowl?

    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      159
    • Seattle Seahawks
      98
    • Referees
      6


Recommended Posts

Good article (Y)

That article explains why Seattle will win and why Pittsburgh won't stop Seattle's offense.

I was thinking the opposite, the Seahawks won't be able to control the Steeler's blitz. And I think it should be fairly easy for the Steelers to contain Alexander. Then I just think the Steelers have a better all around offense. I think they can match Alexander with Bettis, and then the Steelers have stronger wide recievers in my opinion.

I was thinking the opposite, the Seahawks won't be able to control the Steeler's blitz. And I think it should be fairly easy for the Steelers to contain Alexander. Then I just think the Steelers have a better all around offense. I think they can match Alexander with Bettis, and then the Steelers have stronger wide recievers in my opinion.

You think they can match Alexander with Bettis? Are you comparing the NFL MVP with a RB that sits in the bench 60% of the time and only comes out for third and short?

:wacko:

You think they can match Alexander with Bettis? Are you comparing the NFL MVP with a RB that sits in the bench 60% of the time and only comes out for third and short?

:wacko:

I meant Parker before, not Bettis, but that's besides the point. The point I was trying to make is that the Steelers should be able to shut down Alexander, and not make him a major factor in the game, therefore evening the matchup between the Steeler's running game and the Seahawks. I just think with Parker and Bettis running the ball, they should be able to do fairly well.

You think they can match Alexander with Bettis? Are you comparing the NFL MVP with a RB that sits in the bench 60% of the time and only comes out for third and short?

:wacko:

i think they can also. this is the superbowl. and possibly the last pro game bettis will ever play. the regular season means absolutely nothing in this game. Whoever wants to win more will win. offensive and defensive stats through the season really have no effect on the outcome of the superbowl, or any playoff game for that matter.

Started reading part of it and then just stopped...I can't stand it when they throw statistics into things.

I think you're on the wrong board. :cool:

The kind of advanced statistics they use has been very successful in predicting a lot of things.

if he ever intercepted a pass or recovered a fumble, I'd take him down by his hair.

And you're even allowed to do that. Surprised no one has tried it so far.

I wonder how badly Polamalu's injury will affect his performance tomorrow. It would be a shame if such a vital player (on either team) couldn't go at 100%.

It won't. He was fine in practice the day after. It's even possible that the Steelers blew it out of proportion on purpose. It didn't even classify as a minor injury, because he was flying around the field a day later.

I was thinking the opposite, the Seahawks won't be able to control the Steeler's blitz. And I think it should be fairly easy for the Steelers to contain Alexander. Then I just think the Steelers have a better all around offense. I think they can match Alexander with Bettis, and then the Steelers have stronger wide recievers in my opinion.

Have you watched the Seahawks at all this season? I tend to doubt it, because if you did, you'd know:

1)The Seahawks have a better quarterback

2)The Seahawks have a better running game.

3)The Seahawks have a better offensive line.

4)The WRs between the teams are comparable, with a slight edge toward Seattle's.

But the Steelers offense does not compete against the Seahawks offense. They compete against the Seahawks defense.

Offense against Offense: Seattle wins

Defense against Defense: Pittsburgh wins

But that's kind of irrelevant, as those aren't the matchups we're looking at.

I'm concerned about the fact that Seattle hasn't really faced a good 3-4 defense all year. We'll see how they handle Pittsburgh and Dick LeBeau.

i think they can also. this is the superbowl. and possibly the last pro game bettis will ever play. the regular season means absolutely nothing in this game. Whoever wants to win more will win. offensive and defensive stats through the season really have no effect on the outcome of the superbowl, or any playoff game for that matter.

How a team performs all season provides a good indication how they will perform in the playoffs. Sometimes teams wildly exceed that. Usually not.

If a team is outplayed and outcoached, it doesn't matter how much they "want" to win it. News flash: Every team really wants to win in the playoffs. It's hardly the deciding factor.

Seahawks will win. Read this: http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5300680

That article is probably the most comprehensive breakdown of the game and the teams.

Yep, and here's another good one:

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2006/02/0.../3618/#comments

All season Steelers were underrated, they had a good record but they were better than there record. The lost games due to Tommy's lacking quarterback skills, Ben's messed up knee and thumb. If you watched the first colts game it was closer than what the score showed, you take away a few key plays for the colts and steelers are very close if not winning. That was bens first game back from surgery too. Thats how it goes and thats how statistics show things. Could you have expected the steelers to get where they are now? probibly not (could you really expect any team specifically). Am I surprised the steelers walked over 3 of the best teams in the NFL? not really my opinion they were capable of beating anyone and everyone all season.

Who did seattle play all season? I know they definitally didn't have a schedule compared to the steelers or any other AFC team for that matter. There playoff run was a cake walk compared to what the steelers had to endure.

I think the steelers will win, if its close its because the steelers will start running the ball and the clock when they get a lead.

From KFFL.com:

Steelers OLB Joey Porter vs. Seahawks OLT Walter Jones

No one will debate the fact that the Steelers had a good defense all season, but it became great, even special, when right outside linebacker Joey Porter's knee healed late in the season and he started harassing opposing quarterbacks. Porter has three sacks in three postseason games and was a big part of the Steelers holding the powerful Indianapolis Colts offense to three points through three quarters. It's been a long time, however, since Porter met an offensive tackle as protective of his quarterback as the Seahawks' Walter Jones. Porter's pass rush must be kicked up a notch, or Hasselbeck will get the requisite time to find his strong stable of receivers. There also is the matter of disrupting RB Shaun Alexander (141 yards, two touchdowns in the playoffs), who can dominate a game, thanks to the best offensive line in the business. If Porter can't find a way to squeeze into the Seahawks' backfield on run and pass plays, the favored Steelers will have a tougher time with the Seahawks than many of their fans think they will.

Also, check out Roethlisberger's blog:

http://benroethlisberger.typepad.com/roethlisberger/

All season Steelers were underrated, they had a good record but they were better than there record.

The Steelers underrated? How about the Seahawks being underrated for years and years including this one? No one ever talked about Seattle and look at the odds for today's game...they still get no respect.

Who did seattle play all season? I know they definitally didn't have a schedule compared to the steelers or any other AFC team for that matter. There playoff run was a cake walk compared to what the steelers had to endure.

It was a piece of cake walk through the playoffs? Lets talk some statistics since statistics is what matters, not personal opinion. Seattle played Washington in the Divisional playoff...a Washington team ranked second in the NFL in defense. One week later, they play Carolina...a Carolina team ranked fourth in the NFL in defense. What was the outcome of those games? We all know what the outcome was for Seattle's offense, even without Alexander :whistle:

Now, who did the Steelers play? The Steelers played a Cincinnati team ranked 28th in defense, an Indy team ranked 12th, and a Denver team ranked 15th. Before you tell me how good these offenses were...defense wins championships and none of these three teams had defense. On the other hand, Seattle played two teams in the top 5 in defense and still devoured them in every aspect.

Time for the Seahawks to beat another good defense :yes:

Let's look at the playoff picture though. The Steelers barely made it into the playoffs due to a 3 game losing streak. Seahawks had the best record in the NFC leading into the playoffs. They didn't have to face the caliber of teams the Steelers did. We came in 6th seed, and got to the superbowl. That alone is a feat. I honestly don't think the Seahawks could've beaten Cincinatti, the Colts, or the Broncos. Now they have the Steelers, and we are just too physical for them to handle. They are small and fast. We are large, tough, and have a few really fast defensive guys. You can all argue your points like I've argued now, but lets just watch the game and shut up. I'll be here when it is over to see the excuses you Seattle Fans will have for your lame team. Good day to you all!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
    • Flameshot 14.0 RC3 by Razvan Serea Flameshot is a free and open-source, cross-platform tool to take screenshots with many built-in features to save you time. Using Flameshot is as simple as launching, dragging the selection box to cover the area you want to capture, making annotations as needed in on-screen and saving the shot to your computer, all with a very simple and straightforward interface. Flameshot allows users to simply upload their screenshots directly to the cloud in order to easily share it with others. You can upload your image directly to Imgur with a single click and share the URL with others. In-app screenshot editing - You can choose to add an arrow mark, highlight text, blur a section (blur or pixelate an area), add a text, draw something, add a rectangular/circular shaped border, add an incrementing counter number, and add a solid color box with Flameshot's built-in editing tools. Command-line interface (CLI) - Flameshot has several commands you can use in the terminal without launching the GUI via a command line interface. The command line interface lets you script Flameshot and use it as the subject of key binds. Flameshot 14.0 RC3 changelog: Translations update from Hosted Weblate by @weblate in #4612 Translations update from Hosted Weblate by @weblate in #4619 Fix pin position on Windows for scaled screen by @ElTh0r0 in #4614 Cmake Analyzers by @ElTh0r0 in #4613 Translations update from Hosted Weblate by @weblate in #4632 fix(macos): prevent config tab content from rendering behind tab bar by @Mitnitsky in #4627 fix(macos): use CGRequestScreenCaptureAccess instead of grabWindow for permission request by @Mitnitsky in #4617 Fix KDE Plasma keyboard shortcut config file by @ElTh0r0 in #4637 fix(macos): fix clipboard copy failing from tray and GUI by @Mitnitsky in #4629 feature(macos): show dock icon when config window is open by @Mitnitsky in #4628 Option to disable tray icon on Windows by @ElTh0r0 in #4634 Translations update from Hosted Weblate by @weblate in #4642 fix(macos): make fullscreen capture overlay configurable by @Mitnitsky in #4622 Update GH actions using Node.js 24 by @ElTh0r0 in #4660 fix issue with screen selection in non interactive mode by @borgmanJeremy in #4667 Uniformize both spec files + ninja build openSUSE by @QuentiumYT in #4658 screengrabber: pass non-empty parent_window to xdg-desktop-portal by @artefaktor93 in #4664 Allow multiple flameshot GUI instances (fix for #3177) by @ElTh0r0 in #4680 Unify Linux ARM CI into Linux CI (also drop QEMU) by @theofficialgman in #4702 respect system proxy settings by @borgmanJeremy in #4674 Replace ifdef LINUX with UNIX to include BSD systems by @ElTh0r0 in #4700 Download: Flameshot 14.0 RC3 | 18.1 MB (Open Source) Download: Flameshot Portable | 53.0 MB Links: Flameshot Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I found that stability back then was really down to the motherboard manufacturer. Back then i stuck with Microstar motherboards and VIA chipsets as they were ultra reliable. Most stuff was done with jumpers and left little room for user created problems 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      78
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!