Do not inform the thread that you just reported a post


Recommended Posts

Ok. Its great that people are using the report function more and more... it helps a ton.. :)

But when reporting somebody... don't post that you reported them. I mean seriously... think about it in the real world... are you going to walk up to somebody stealing a car and say... oh btw... I called the cops on you. You'd probably get shot.

Common sense people... report the post and be done with it... don't dwell on it. We will take care of the rest.

Telling somebody you reported their posts leads to flames, arguments, and more rule breakage

Thanks

shockz

Edit: Update: Please don't report typos, spelling, or grammatical errors. (Unless its a news article)

Those aren't rule breaking issues, and are a waste of time for staff to sort through.

Thank you.

Edited by shockz

what if you let the reporter know you reported them.

how would they know you reported them? you would have to tell them you reported them for them to find out you actually did report them. :wacko:

I dont see why people cant post that they reported someone/thing. If i see a post that isnt good, i will report it, sometimes say i have. If i have, its a guide for others not to bother as a mod has been told.

What should be stopped is the people flamming and saying "why you report my thread". There the ones your after! I suppose though, there the bad people who wont stop doing the wrong thing. So the good people (reporters ;)) will get knocked down again and again.

I dont see why people cant post that they reported someone/thing. If i see a post that isnt good, i will report it, sometimes say i have. If i have, its a guide for others not to bother as a mod has been told.

What should be stopped is the people flamming and saying "why you report my thread". There the ones your after! I suppose though, there the bad people who wont stop doing the wrong thing. So the good people (reporters ) will get knocked down again and again.

Hmmm, I have to disagree with you here. In quite a lot of cases, putting "reported" in to a thread could almost be classed as flame-bait. If you know you'll probably end up being flamed for posting it, why bother? At the end of the day, the moderation team do a great job here, and if the thread or post warrants being moderated, then it will be - posting about it is not going to make a difference other than potentially get a few nasty words fired in your direction, and getting a +1 on your post count...

Hmmm, I have to disagree with you here. In quite a lot of cases, putting "reported" in to a thread could almost be classed as flame-bait. If you know you'll probably end up being flamed for posting it, why bother? At the end of the day, the moderation team do a great job here, and if the thread or post warrants being moderated, then it will be - posting about it is not going to make a difference other than potentially get a few nasty words fired in your direction, and getting a +1 on your post count...

Humm.

I suppose i agree, it can spark off flames its self, but as i said, people should do so. But i suppose again, the reporters should post it, it jsut causes havoc.

If i post reported i usally say why, or express my opinion (on the matter). Unless its something i dont have a opinion on, and it would proberly cause more trouble.

But, the mods want to reported's anymore, so i will stop completly. If they feel its more annoying than helpful, so be it

Of course the other thing that it does is just attract more attention to the thread in question. A good example is the good ol' fashion spam post. The more people who post "Spam" and "Reported" in the thread, the more attention it gets due to the number of posts going with it - it'll keep appearing in the list on the front page.

More attention for spam = more people who could possibly fall for it.

Im a big fan of reporting threads - I also post that the thread has been reported to inform other viewers of it that it has already been done.

Sometimes when a thread is reported, nothing is done, or if a thread is reported and not posted as such, it can grow to quite a few pages and people will be replying saying 'omgwtfbbq why hasnt this been reported yet'.

Glad we have a stance on this officially now, but I agree with the other poster above a few that says we only did it to inform others.

I'm glad this has been said I'm sick of the wanabe mods trying to be complete suck ups it just looks imature, report the thread by all means if it breaks the rules but don't go +1 and go reported :)

Lol... now that you say this It look stupid sometime...

BUT the most useless is (And I think you should warn thoses that do this):

+1 Before the close...

Anyway...

[Post Reported] :p

But when reporting somebody... don't post that you reported them.

Well wouldn't it make since for one person to post "reported", this way 40 people dont end up reporting it, just the one that say they reported it. If I read that it has been "Reported" then I can say well its been reported no need for me to do it?

Well wouldn't it make since for one person to post "reported", this way 40 people dont end up reporting it, just the one that say they reported it. If I read that it has been "Reported" then I can say well its been reported no need for me to do it?

No... like I said... we can group the reports very quickly. It doesn't create a problem.

Well wouldn't it make since for one person to post "reported", this way 40 people dont end up reporting it, just the one that say they reported it. If I read that it has been "Reported" then I can say well its been reported no need for me to do it?

It can be helpful to know that 40 people objected to the content rather than just a single person.

Well said, getting sick of the people posting 'reported' and acting all smug :|

Agreed. The whole reported thing got old a long time ago, and really it merely serves to inflame an already hostile environment.

Although maybe it precludes others from also reporting the same post. Otherwise, you might get 10 reports of the same post, thus spamming the mod forum.

It can be helpful to know that 40 people objected to the content rather than just a single person.

Ah, good point I suppose.

Posts like this too: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry587233466

I may have just done something to this thread that I apparently cant post about because it is seen as spam, but due to the content of what has gone before I dont think it will matter.

If you know what I have done then dont post again saying that you have done it because it has been done.

The Moderators will get a secret message in their special forum about this thread.

Good Eeeeevening.

Don't do that. Thanks.

  • 2 months later...

Posting Reported... doesn't add to the topic and it is essentially spamming so we reserve the right to crack down on it without notice if we feel that it is becoming a pervasive problem that needs to be culled.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!