nVidia ForceWare 84.21 Drivers Released


Recommended Posts

You knew when installing X64 that it had crappy driver support. That is the only thing hold me back from using it.

Yeah I did. An for awhile there nvidia was updating their x64 drivers right along side the 32bit ones.... they've just been slacking lately.

:)

You have to install nVidia Pure Video (they have a 30 day trial of it on their site somewhere). Thanx, I will give em a try tomorrow.

The nVidia Purevideo program is the new name for the DVD player. It's an mpeg 2 decoder. On the site it says that, amongst others, WinDVD 7 supports H264 decoding on the 6600GT. It doesn't. I tried a .mov, it uses 100% cpu and plays really slowly. I tried a Nero one that nVidia has in their "showcase", WinDVD crashed.

This might sound really stupid, but I've tried clicking on the accept button to d/l the drivers, and nothing happens. I tried the primary site and all of the mirror sites and the button doesn't do anything! I clicked the cancel button, and it works fine.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

The nVidia Purevideo program is the new name for the DVD player. It's an mpeg 2 decoder. On the site it says that, amongst others, WinDVD 7 supports H264 decoding on the 6600GT. It doesn't. I tried a .mov, it uses 100% cpu and plays really slowly. I tried a Nero one that nVidia has in their "showcase", WinDVD crashed.

Well when i play any movie file (including .avi's) with Media Player Classic my CPU usage sticks around %10.

its better to run driver cleaner in safe mode just to be sure u get rid of eveything

I have only done this once in the past 3 years, and I have not ever had any issues with just installing on top of older driver versions.

From my personal experience I really think the only time you need to run driver cleaner is when upgrading your card and more importantly when changing card vendors and/or makers. Also if you are troubleshooting some kind of system instability that you think may be driver related. Other than that, I just install on top of the older ones and never had any issues at all.

Also FYI for everyone else, they are not WHQL'd on my 6800 Ultra either.

Well when i play any movie file (including .avi's) with Media Player Classic my CPU usage sticks around %10.

By avis I assume you mean DivX or Xvid which are very easy to decode. H264 is very hardware intensive. The best software decoder at the moment is CoreAVC which can decode a 720p video with only 80% cpu used, but that's without decoding the soundtrack (AC3 passed through spdif). On the other hand, 720p Xvid uses about 40% cpu including the soundtrack.

By avis I assume you mean DivX or Xvid which are very easy to decode. H264 is very hardware intensive. The best software decoder at the moment is CoreAVC which can decode a 720p video with only 80% cpu used, but that's without decoding the soundtrack (AC3 passed through spdif). On the other hand, 720p Xvid uses about 40% cpu including the soundtrack.

I see what u mean now, just played the 1080p Silent Hill trailer (first H264 movie file ive watched) with MPC (using Quicktime Alt), I have these drivers installed and PureVideo, and my CPU was around %60 most of the time (sometimes went down to around %50 but never went above %80).

Unless u havent read, the 6600GT is now WHQL'd, they missed a file out of the original release of the drivers, they are now updated and have that file with them (check the filesize of the 84.21 file, if its 21MB then u have the old ones, the new ones are 20.9MB (new ones also have the light blue file icon)).

Not saying that getting the new release will fix ur prob with WinDVD, im just letting you know that PureVideo seems to be working for me with MPC and these drivers.

Unless u havent read, the 6600GT is now WHQL'd, they missed a file out of the original release of the drivers, they are now updated and have that file with them (check the filesize of the 84.21 file, if its 21MB then u have the old ones, the new ones are 20.9MB (new ones also have the light blue file icon)).

Not saying that getting the new release will fix ur prob with WinDVD, im just letting you know that PureVideo seems to be working for me with MPC and these drivers.

Thanks for the info (Y), now downloading the updated driver. 60% cpu on your CPU is decoding in software, there's no way it'd be that high if it was decoding it on the GPU. Note that I have a 2500+.

-- Nvidia says: * Before installing new drivers make sure you uninstall all NVIDIA display drivers from the Windows Control Panel. Browse to the Start Menu > Windows Control Panel > Add/Remove Programs and search for "NVIDIA Windows Display Drivers" or "NVIDIA Display Drivers" and select remove.

but to each his own. if something has been working for you, go with it.

Hey guys, im just wondering i have a x64 system, but am using 32bit windows xp pro... i also have a 7800 GT should i d/l these drivers or not?

Yep. (Y)

The only time you need to worry if the drivers are for 64 is if you are using the XP64 Operating System. The 64 bit drivers do not refer to your Processor, just your OS.

So until you update your OS to the 64 Bit Version, you are always fine with their normal drivers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!