Man kills teen boy who walked on his grass


Recommended Posts

It's not so much about gun ownership as it is about gun carrying. Where are you getting those numbers anyway? Link me.

http://www.guncontrol.ca/Content/TheCaseForGunControl.html

http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/pol-leg/res-eval...rpt_e.asp#Table 1

http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/GunsinCanada.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20011108062857/...02033037_1.html

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:vBAr2K...us&ct=clnk&cd=2

Canadian gun ownership laws are more strict than the US. You're also forgetting about the huge population difference. So I'm way more likely to get my ass shot in the street here than I am back home.

I'm not sure you understand the concept of percentages.

Plus what the hell,

(1) this guy legally owned his gun,

(2) it was a shotgun (not a handgun), and

(3) he was on his own property, not cruisin' around town.

Still would have happened if he lived in Canada.

Sorry, but then your precious constitution is messed up. Trespassing is no excuse for killing people.

Here in Denmark you have to have hunting license in order to own a gun (and unlike US people don't go hunting with attack rifles).

Sorry guys, but that's my oppinion.

He shot the kid with a shotgun, which is a hunting weapon, not an attack rifle. Trespassing is no excuse for killing someone, you are correct. That's why the old man is in JAIL. The Constitution is just fine.

^ I agree. Crazy americans and their guns. They only need them to protect themselves from all the other crazy americans with guns

Yes, your right. We all know that guns only exist in America and that only Americans are crazy people who just happen to own guns... :rolleyes:

You should NOT be allowed to own a gun. Nobody should, not even an army, there is no skill involved in it, no way of protecting yourself from it. Its a point, click weapon. It is pointed at a person, and usually, that person is dead. Doesn't ANYBODY see how that should never, ever, be allowed? No chance of defence, unless you have a gun yourself, but thats not a defence thats an offence.

yeah, cutting someones head of with a sword or bashing your skull with whatever they used is so much better :p. war is always cruel and useless, if everybody was a chicken like me the world would be a much better place :p

http://www.guncontrol.ca/Content/TheCaseForGunControl.html

http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/pol-leg/res-eval...rpt_e.asp#Table 1

http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/GunsinCanada.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20011108062857/...02033037_1.html

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:vBAr2K...us&ct=clnk&cd=2

I'm not sure you understand the concept of percentages.

Plus what the hell,

(1) this guy legally owned his gun,

(2) it was a shotgun (not a handgun), and

(3) he was on his own property, not cruisin' around town.

Still would have happened if he lived in Canada.

It wouldnt have happened in Canada because we don't have the mentality of shooting people who tresspass. Thats where the problem comes from. it's all in you perception.

To each his own? You just justified the cold blooded, unnecessary murder of a young boy. You wouldn't side with the man if that was your son, and I'm pretty certain you wouldn't shoot a boy for walking on your lawn. Please, explain to me your justification. You will lose in this thread.

Glad I don't live where you live.

There is more to the story.......apparently the entire family of the kid had been harassing him for

quite some time over the period of years. Not that it is justification for shooting someone, but

who knows what was going on in this guys head. Should he be punished, that is for a jury to

deceide. As with most reports, depends on which news outlet you get the "story" from as to

which slant you will take on the article. For example, from the story, you get the "impression"

that the kid was minding his own business and the old guy just shot him. Now, lets say that

the real story (just an example) was that the kid was threatening this guy, and had a bottle,

stick, knife etc in his hand...Makes for a totally different story doesn't it? With the anti-gun

bias in the media, I'm sure the story was originally written to slant it against the gun owner.

Perhaps when it comes to trial, we'll find out the WHOLE story. Whatever the outcome, unless

the kid was pointing a firearm at the old man, he deserves to be punished, unless they find

him not guilty by reason of mental desease or defect.

:alien:

Owning a firearm should be illegal.

Owning a firearm should be illegal.

The fact that most Americas owned weapons played a heavy role in keep the former Soviet Union from ever invading. One of their previous top generals said that they knew if they ever invaded that every "tom, dick and harry" would be taking pot shots at the troops on every occasion.

Also, during WWII, Every man in Switzerland had a rifle at home. Shooting was the national sport. A look at a map shows tiny, democratic Switzerland surrounded by the Axis powers stretching all over Europe and into Russia and North Africa. This nation of riflemen situated in the Alps managed to remain neutral and to dissuade a Nazi invasion. In fact, Hitler disarmed his enemies (starting from German Jews) before they could organize a resistance.

My comment on the original story is.... that will learn that kid a thing or two. I am sorry that it cost him his life, but I don't feel bad for him. 100 years ago, what that old man did would not have been a crime...

Edited by betasp

What the hell is wrong with you? He killed a boy for walking on his grass. You need some help.

If the kid and his parents have been messing with this guy for 5 years perhaps the old guy just snapped. i dont like being "f" ed with for 5 seconds let alone 5 years, so until anyone walks in the old guys shoes they should reserve judgement and let the courts sort this out

To each his own.

So you are saying I can shoot my Mail Carrier since she walks across my lawn daily? Man, get a grip with reality...

I can see the guy coming out and yelling at the kid and/or contacting his parents or police but shooting is WAY to much. That means I can shoot my neighbor for his grass clippings landing on my sidewalk when he cuts his lawn. NOT

So you are saying I can shoot my Mail Carrier since she walks across my lawn daily? Man, get a grip with reality...

I can see the guy coming out and yelling at the kid and/or contacting his parents or police but shooting is WAY to much. That means I can shoot my neighbor for his grass clippings landing on my sidewalk when he cuts his lawn. NOT

Exactly. Thank you.

http://www.guncontrol.ca/Content/TheCaseForGunControl.html

http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/pol-leg/res-eval...rpt_e.asp#Table 1

http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/GunsinCanada.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20011108062857/...02033037_1.html

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:vBAr2K...us&ct=clnk&cd=2

I'm not sure you understand the concept of percentages.

Plus what the hell,

(1) this guy legally owned his gun,

(2) it was a shotgun (not a handgun), and

(3) he was on his own property, not cruisin' around town.

Still would have happened if he lived in Canada.

Nah, the concept of percentages registers pretty well with me. Let's just put away the statistics for a second and read that whole article in the first link. Especially the part about self protection.

This story stands out because the dude is obviously a total wacko. If he was a total wacko without a gun, he would not have shot the kid. The fact that the kid was on his property doesn't give him the right. Owning a gun legally is a pretty laughable concept to me.

Watch the news. Can't go a few days without hearing a story about someone getting shot.

Still, the violent crime rates in canada are hell of a lot lower than the US. I dunno about you, but that makes me feel safer.

This is not surprising. Some people are very perticular about their posessions and don't like it when others tamper with them. I can't say I blame him for what he did especially when he had problems with the neighbors for that many years. In some parts of the United States it isn't uncommon for people to kill trespassers.

Dude...What part of the United States are you talking about? It's not common to kill trespassers anywhere...

This guy who shot the kid is just nuts. He has probably gone his whole life being obsessive compulsive and it has never spilled over. Now a kid pushed his buttons a little bit and he snaps and goes into wacko mode and kills him over walking on his grass. I hope they lock that dude up and throw away the key.

So you are saying I can shoot my Mail Carrier since she walks across my lawn daily? Man, get a grip with reality...

I can see the guy coming out and yelling at the kid and/or contacting his parents or police but shooting is WAY to much. That means I can shoot my neighbor for his grass clippings landing on my sidewalk when he cuts his lawn. NOT

Ok, maybe not kill the little piece of crap. Just a shot to the leg would do. Just as a warning.

So you are saying I can shoot my Mail Carrier since she walks across my lawn daily? Man, get a grip with reality...

I can see the guy coming out and yelling at the kid and/or contacting his parents or police but shooting is WAY to much. That means I can shoot my neighbor for his grass clippings landing on my sidewalk when he cuts his lawn. NOT

The mail guy has permission. If the old man did not want the mail guy there, he could get a PO box. I am not saying what the old man did was wrong, but again, 100 years ago it would not have been a crime.

Oh, and your analogy is not apples to apples. Can I walk through your house whenever I want and it be illegal to shoot me... even if it is your sisters room at 3am?

Its sad but doesnt surprise me at all. People can do anything nowadays.

In the US maybe, but you don't have to expect to get away with stuff like that here in the Netherlands. I honestly can't remember the last time something like this happened in the EU.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!