Recommended Posts

I always used a PC... but now im thinking about this idea of using a mac (because of the power?) with windows for some programs/games.

My question! (i dont know anything about macs...) Can someone tell me the equivalent in PC of a iMac 2GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM? i was thinking of upgrading my pc to a $3,500 DELL pc... but now, im not sure from which one im going to get the best performace.. (i always like to paid for the "best")

* I run programs like photoshop, Maya, and some video editiing. Also, sometimes i run this programs at the same time.. and always is a pain in the... thats why i need more power.

thanks!

Idk the equivalent but OMG! With that budget do yourself a MASSIVE favor and just buy the Macbook Pro!!!! Amazingly powerful, get 2GB of RAM, and the graphics are amazing + new windows installs...omg just dont even waste time on DELL.

Well. I managed last night to get Boot Camp to partition my HD but it has also corrupted by OSX partition so now I cant boot OSX. Disk utility can't repair the drive nor can running 'fsck' in single-user mode. I am also having trouble installing XP, can't read my CD properly for some reason.

So right now. I am without my MBP with no OSX and no XP. I'm in work typing this. :( :cry:

Did you get things restored? How much of your free space did you allocate to XP? Did you backup before trying this?

I have an 80GB HD (74GB formatted) and I allocated about 20GB to XP leaving 21 GB free on the OS X partition.

It is possible that you allocated too much free space and overwrote your kernel and/or your file system catalog files. Have you tried a repair install with your OS X installer disk?

I did not backup before trying but luckily everything went fine.

For anyone trying this, be sure to backup your data first and deauthorize your iTunes (assuming you bought iTMS songs) before trying this. Remember, this is beta software.

Anyone tried Parallels yet? Supposed to be just as good, near native speeds while running virtually any x86 OS Inside OSX ...no reboots.

Parallels

I am curious people's experiences with this...

Well it can't be as good as running Windows natively on your Mac since you'll have Mac OS X running in the background. That means your Mac has to keep two systems running at the same time: Double the CPU, RAM, GPU usage. It might work just fine with relatively simple tasks like Microsoft Office or a BitTorrent Client, but gaming or heavy video (etc.) editing is a whole different story.

Boot Camp itself is nothing more than a nice Windows-on-your-Mac setup wizard, the firmware update is what actually allows Windows to run on your Intel Mac.

It's supposed to be quite advanced, and nearly native by leveraging the intel core duo virtualization technology that's built into the chip...I will post later about my experiences with it.

It can be very advanced in the sense that there is hardly any speed loss in the emulation process, but you can't go around the fact Mac OS X and all of it's services are still running too. That's the reason why it will be never near as fast as running Windows natively on your Mac.

It's safe to say that most computers aren't capable of running two operating systems at the same time while also playing a high-end game for example.

well yes, I never was even implying you could render in autocad or maya while playing oblivion with no performance hit...but, any serious gamer would never try that anyways. Virtualization is not geared towards gamers or hardcore cpu intensive programs. This is meant for those who use OSX for 90% of there needs and then need to use MS Access for example....most "normal" programs will bearable under virtualization.

Anyone tried Parallels yet? Supposed to be just as good, near native speeds while running virtually any x86 OS Inside OSX ...no reboots.

Parallels

I am curious people's experiences with this...

I just installed it and don't like it. It is waaay faster than VPC7 on my powerbook, but still nothing like native. There is visible lag on my duo core mini and i have 2gb of ram (1gb dedicated to the vm). Also I cant get it to recognize the physical cdrom, i had to point it to an iso to get it to install. I will stick with dual booting for now.

I would like to have a wine port that works so i can just run outlook 2003 in osx. that is the only frickin' windows app that i want!

I just installed and have a few questions, is there anyway to stop the windows ntfs volume from appearing in finder without ejecting it everytime? and can i change the osx icons of the windows volume somehow?

Can't you change the icon by going to the Info screen (cmd+I), select the icon preview above "Spotlight Comments" and paste another icon on it? If so you can replace the icon by a 100% transparent one and call the Windows HD "hit spacebar once", it will be virtually invisible that way.

If not you'll have to do it to a temporarily folder (change the icon of it), boot into Windows XP and replace the Windows HD's DSStore file with the one from the temporarily folder. You may have to make Windows XP show all hidden files but it should work.

Edited by Neowave
Can't you change the icon by going to the Info screen (cmd+I), select the icon preview above "Spotlight Comments" and paste another icon on it?

You can't do that because OSX is unable to write to an NTFS partition, but I'll give the other idea a whirl and see how it turns out.

Thanks

^ haha all the Apple stuff :p

Can someone please answer:

How does XP run compared to OSX on the same machine? Similar speeds?

And how does XP on Mac hardware compare to XP on non-Mac hardware with similar specs?

It would be awesome if that 'Rosetta' rumour was actually in development ^_^

I'm sure this whole Boot Camp thing is oging to turn out to be one great move by Apple...

^ haha all the Apple stuff :p

Can someone please answer:

How does XP run compared to OSX on the same machine? Similar speeds?

And how does XP on Mac hardware compare to XP on non-Mac hardware with similar specs?

It would be awesome if that 'Rosetta' rumour was actually in development ^_^

I'm sure this whole Boot Camp thing is oging to turn out to be one great move by Apple...

XP seems to run about the same, if not faster than OSX on my Mini, Core Solo 1.5 GHz with 512 MB of ram. And it runsn a little bit slower on the mini than it did on my Athlon 64 2800 with a gig of ram.

Anyone tried Parallels yet? Supposed to be just as good, near native speeds while running virtually any x86 OS Inside OSX ...no reboots.

Parallels

I am curious people's experiences with this...

Parallels runs very fast. It certainly takes advantage of CPU Virtualization. Its very near native speed. Pity it doesnt take advantage of the video card. Maybe I could try installing the drivers that Apple provides with Boot Camp. :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!