Recommended Posts

I've got a feeling this may be one of the new additions in Leopard - since Boot Camp is going to be a feature of Leopard, Apple may want to add full NTFS support for XP.

Yeah exactly. Currently we have a pretty crappy situation because you're forced to use NTFS when having a partition larger than 32 GB (or something like that).

Ok well I have thought about it, and read some rumors that make a ton of sense and have come to the conclusion that boot camp will be the corner stone of making Macs a more popular machine bundled with a future more popular OS. What's the reason behind this? Yellow Box. Yellow Box was a NextStep deal that would make the programing architectures (I think that would be the right terminology) such as Carbon or Cocoa universal, aka, you could program using those fronts on a Windows PC, a PPC Mac or an Intel Mac. Think about that for a second. Programers would be able to easily program apps, that are universal across 3 different platforms.

Anyhow, rumor has it, that Apple is working on a yellow box type solution again. It would weigh somewhere in the 150 meg range, and would allow for developers to develop universal programs for both Mac and PC. Apple ports the Cocoa and Carbon API's as well as Xcode to Windows, and it makes developers real happy. What does Boot Camp have to do with this? Its simply a method of getting people to switch over to OS X. It is a safety net for those that need to use those one or two windows programs. Leopard would introduce a virtualization of Windows for OS X and that coupled with the fact that developers would be developing universal programs for all three platforms, its a no loose situation.

At first I thought this was a bunch of eh BS to be honest, but now that I think about it, if this is what Apple is doing and has in its cards, then its genius. Developers need not worry about wasting money developing for Mac because they could develop for all 3 at the same time. It saves money and makes the consumer happy too. Apple uses the safety net feature of having Boot Camp and later on a virtual version of Windows in Leopard, to draw in switchers. And MS is fine because developers would be able to develop cool programs in a very nice, easy to use environment.

If these predictions turn out to be true, I really think its blue skies for Apple. The combination of dramatic enhanced compatibility and interoperability plus ease of development for consumers with successful safety net for consumers, will be Apple's strength in taking a nice chunk of the market. Apple will never beat MS, I think everyone knows that. But with a strategy that at least tries to accomplish the same goals as the one that I sort of laid out, I think they can regain a nice little segment.

I don't think so, this would just allow developers do develop programs that would run on both platforms nativly. That can only be a good thing because if Apple plays its cards right, OS X will be an actual competitor. Aqua and OS X specific technologies will still be OS X specific, but being able to program applications that will run on both platforms will make development costs drop and make developers jobs easier. It will just open the door for more development on the OS X side.

^If one application is being developed for both Mac OS X and Windows in the way you're stating won't that seriously affect Aqua and other Mac OS X-specific technologies? :/

Apple enforces strict GUI guidelines, if a professional developer makes an application it must meet the guidelines of each OS, which is very doable, most likely it will be implemented so that this is done automatically, picture itunes on windows vs. osx.

Apple enforces strict GUI guidelines, if a professional developer makes an application it must meet the guidelines of each OS, which is very doable, most likely it will be implemented so that this is done automatically, picture itunes on windows vs. osx.

Bingo

Parallels runs very fast. It certainly takes advantage of CPU Virtualization. Its very near native speed. Pity it doesnt take advantage of the video card. Maybe I could try installing the drivers that Apple provides with Boot Camp. :whistle:

I was just going to do the same thing this evening. I can tell everyone as well, it runs very fast. I would say excluding the second of lag when you click inside the virtual machine it is definitely quick enough to make you think it was native. I'll be getting my extra ram today...so I'll let you know how this runs with a dedicated 1GB to it :yes:

I was just going to do the same thing this evening. I can tell everyone as well, it runs very fast. I would say excluding the second of lag when you click inside the virtual machine it is definitely quick enough to make you think it was native. I'll be getting my extra ram today...so I'll let you know how this runs with a dedicated 1GB to it :yes:

Parallels will not let you run games regardless of what drivers you install. The video drivers Apple provides for the XP install are just ATI Catalyst drivers. The VM only provides an SVGA card. It is only useful for productivity apps and the like which are not available on OS X.

Parallels will not let you run games regardless of what drivers you install. The video drivers Apple provides for the XP install are just ATI Catalyst drivers. The VM only provides an SVGA card. It is only useful for productivity apps and the like which are not available on OS X.

Does anyone know if the ATI drivers Apple supplies in Boot Camp are the latest available from ATI. Can you for example, get newer/updated versions for XP from ATI's site and install them. :unsure:

Does anyone know if the ATI drivers Apple supplies in Boot Camp are the latest available from ATI. Can you for example, get newer/updated versions for XP from ATI's site and install them. :unsure:

Welcome to the world of Windows Drivers.

Yes, you can. Will they work properly? I'm not sure. The video BIOS is usually the only difference between a PC video card and a Mac video card. If there is some Mac specific feature in the video BIOS of your card, the generic Ati drivers probably won't support it (power management comes to mind). Naturally, on a desktop this may not be an issue.

Parallels will not let you run games regardless of what drivers you install. The video drivers Apple provides for the XP install are just ATI Catalyst drivers. The VM only provides an SVGA card. It is only useful for productivity apps and the like which are not available on OS X.

argh...for craps sake. Once and for all, I am not saying you can or would want to run games on Parallels. The attraction of Parallels is that you don't have to dual boot and you don't have to restart to use Windows.

You use Windows inside OSX, you can use Final Cut to do your video editing in the native OSX environment, then open up your VM in Parallels to use MS Access or any other Windows App you need in very near native speeds...side by side, no reboots.

Yeesh.

Apple enforces strict GUI guidelines, if a professional developer makes an application it must meet the guidelines of each OS, which is very doable, most likely it will be implemented so that this is done automatically, picture itunes on windows vs. osx.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but basically you mean an "universal" application that runs on both Mac OS X and Windows will contain resources (toolbar icons for example) for both platforms? So basically everything is double?

How are you going to that with Mac OS X specific technologies like Spotlight etc.? Those won't run on Windows.

You use Windows inside OSX, you can use Final Cut to do your video editing in the native OSX environment, then open up your VM in Parallels to use MS Access or any other Windows App you need in very near native speeds...side by side, no reboots.

Yeesh.

I don't think Final Cut will run that fast with Windows XP in Parallel hogging up resources. ;)

tried it at work today with member qbie.

ran 3dmark 03 and got 6,363 - this is on the high end imac. one thing i did notice was the botting times on the winxp-was very fast. i just hope driver are developed for the isight and other hardware thats not working at the moment.

very nice... :) pics taken with mobile phone-so abit grainy.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

I want a Macbook Pro so badly now. I've got love for MacOS, and I'd take it over Windows any day, but as an engineering student, sometimes I'm forced to use programs that don't have MacOS equivalents. I was thinking of buying a MBP and dual booting with the onmac.net method, but Boot Camp just seems like a perfect solution now.

I was wondering, why does my iMac X1600 show up as a Mobility card on Windows? On the Apple website it says nothing about it being a mobility version of the card, and they do make the distinction on the MacBook Pro site. Is it a driver thing (just using the same drivers for now and they'll fix later?) or do they just sneak that mobility in on the iMac users? ;)

Sorry if it's been asked before, I think I've read most of this thread but I might have missed something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!