entry level dSLR


Recommended Posts

The 28-88 won't allow for wide angle shots. The 18-55 would be better. However, the 18-70 would be ideal, since it's the lens that comes with the D70.

what do you mean by "its the lens that comes with D70" ?

what are the pros of the 28-88?

i've read several reviews on the lenses, but what better reviews that people who've used it ! ( most sites are biased on X Brand..)

The 18-70mm is one of Nikon's best deals. It is a leap above all the other kit lenses, including the ones you mentioned.

Check out fredmiranda.com or nikonians.org for what people think.

Remember that Nikon DSLRs have a magnification factor of 1.5, so the 28-80mm becomes a 42-120mm lens on a D50. Not a very useful range for general purpose shots.

The 18-70mm is one of Nikon's best deals. It is a leap above all the other kit lenses, including the ones you mentioned.

Check out fredmiranda.com or nikonians.org for what people think.

Remember that Nikon DSLRs have a magnification factor of 1.5, so the 28-80mm becomes a 42-120mm lens on a D50. Not a very useful range for general purpose shots.

Interesting fact about the magnification factor, very useful!!!

Only thing is on ebay, the bundles with the 18-70 are 700+ which goes above my budget, so I guess it's going to be the 18-55 unless I find a good site with cheap deals.

If you're not that nit-picky about image quality or construction, the 18-55mm will do just fine.

A used 18-70mm can be bought for ~$200, FYI.

I wouldn't recommend buying from ebay, since the morons there love to drive the prices of items way beyond what they're worth. Don't waste your time. Since you don't live in the states, you might also want to factor in any duties + local sales tax + shipping + possible brokerage fees (try to ship with a service that absorbs the brokerage fee into their standard rate) as well.

it's a personnal preference. the 28-88 will zoom more then the 18-55 or 18-70 but it's lacking of wide angle.

Unless you project to buy a wide angle zoom (around 12-24mm) which I don't think you will (very expensive), then I'd buy the 18-55mm from nikkor. If and only if you have the money, I'd buy a 18-200 as the standard lens. Could be from Tamron Tamron 2nd link or Sigma

I own the tamron and darn I love it!

If you're not that nit-picky about image quality or construction, the 18-55mm will do just fine.

A used 18-70mm can be bought for ~$200, FYI.

I wouldn't recommend buying from ebay, since the morons there love to drive the prices of items way beyond what they're worth. Don't waste your time. Since you don't live in the states, you might also want to factor in any duties + local sales tax + shipping + possible brokerage fees (try to ship with a service that absorbs the brokerage fee into their standard rate) as well.

Still even considering those factors, buyin from the states and shipping it in, is a lot cheaper than buy it where I live, Just so you get an idea, The cheapest price for the Rebel XT here is no LESS than

$1261.829 including only lens kit :| :no: and well ebay has nice prices for the nikon d50. I tried froogling a but the stores with good cheap bundles have very low merchants rating ( 2/5), or most over price the accesories.

www.bhphotovideo.com had almost my budget bundle, but when adding memory it went up to $790

So know of any other trustworthy/good merchant rating store, suggestions welcome!

I did find a nice bundle at for around $650 lens and memory http://www.onecall.com/ but they say "in order" aka "out of stock" :no:

it's a personnal preference. the 28-88 will zoom more then the 18-55 or 18-70 but it's lacking of wide angle.

Unless you project to buy a wide angle zoom (around 12-24mm) which I don't think you will (very expensive), then I'd buy the 18-55mm from nikkor. If and only if you have the money, I'd buy a 18-200 as the standard lens. Could be from Tamron Tamron 2nd link or Sigma

I own the tamron and darn I love it!

Well then it's the 18-55, I would like a nice macro lens, but those seem more expensive. Oh well, down the road I guess.

Edit: http://www.butterflyphoto.com/ seems to have reasonable price on body and accesories !

Edited by maudit

Is butterflyphoto a reliable vendor?

Yeah it has awesome merchant ratings!!!

Man, I am so close to buying that from butterfly, such a great deal considering at the local Staples its 900 dollars for the same package...

yeah, I on the other side have to wait a month or so/till I get payed :no: But I think ebay is now off the list :D !

yeah, I on the other side have to wait a month or so/till I get payed :no: But I think ebay is now off the list :D !

No don't worry, I have to wait too, I have no money what so ever, i think my last balance was just around 50 dollars, lol. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for graduation, lol.

B&H and Adorama. B&H has a brick and mortar store, I don't know about Adorama though.

I do know that they're two of the best places to buy photo equipment from.

I edited my post. Have a look before your post

and like Monkeh said, yes they are one of the best sites to buy photo stock in usa from what I've heard

The only thing I don't like about those two stores is the price :pinch: :no:

Don't buy Pentax they have lens problems. My gf had her Pentax open in the purse and the lens got jammed and wouldn't extend and said lens error. She had to send it away to get fixed.

Pentax dSLR ?

If you wanted the d50, Dell has a sale going on right now for it. http://www.slickdeals.net/#p7345

Cheaper than butterflyphoto too.

heh yea, I'm tempted to buy it.

Damn :no: will that deal last till end of month!!! ?

and what is "Use your DPA account " ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!