entry level dSLR


Recommended Posts

the dpa account is the "Dell Preferred Account." It's basically if you have their credit card. Most people probably don't, so you won't get that extra 2% savings, which isn't that much. Still only about 540ish without the 2% savings. My guess is it doesn't last longer htan the week, but I'm sure dell will have the sale again in the future.

the dpa account is the "Dell Preferred Account." It's basically if you have their credit card. Most people probably don't, so you won't get that extra 2% savings, which isn't that much. Still only about 540ish without the 2% savings. My guess is it doesn't last longer htan the week, but I'm sure dell will have the sale again in the future.

they all say "expire: 00/00/00" Maybe forever :blink: ?

heh, I just picked up the d50 with the 18-55 lens for 575 after taxes. boo to them having a taxable location in NY.

(Y) good pick up mate!!!

aww boo, it's 6 weeks till delivery... oh well i'll just have to wait to get it i guess.

How come 6 weeks till delivery ? :no: that's roughly almost 3 months :pinch:

Argghhhh If I had the money right now... oh well hope it's still there by the time I get the cash...

I noticed that the "sale" they had is supposed to expire on 4/20, so I'm not sure what the price of the camera'll be afterwards. Hopefully I won't have to actually wait the whole 5 weeks before I get the camera, but if so, I'll just start reading up on how to use the camera.

Well i've been doing a lot of reading on the entry level dSLR's, most of them mentioned in this thread. Most important thing I read was " Are you planning on buying any more lenses after you purchase a dslr with a 18-55". My answer to that is leaning a lot towards no. And suggestions on many websites to that is, get a high end prosumer SLR-like camera. Like a Fujifilm Finepix s9000, Kodak p880, Panasomic FZ-30 and so on, The only thing holding me back on my final choice is image quality, which I know dSLR stand out in that area, But like I said before, I really don't think I'll be purchasing another lense after the one that comes bundled ( 18-55mm), Maybe a year after I actually buy the camera. So my question is, will the standard 18-55mm Fit my needs and be better off than those fixed lens slr-like cameras? And in terms of "lens capability" will I be better off with 18-55 or 28-80mm, Pink floyd repplied it's subjective, but I want to know experiences from you people who seem to have used these lenses a lot..

Edited by maudit

So my question is, will the standard 18-55mm Fit my needs and be better off than those fixed lens slr-like cameras? And in terms of "lens capability" will I be better off with 18-55 or 28-80mm, Pink floyd repplied it's subjective, but I want to know experiences from you people who seem to have used these lenses a lot..

What are your "needs?" Also, why don't you try both out before deciding instead of taking other ppl's word for it? If you're that stuck on the fence, go to your local Ritz Camera or whatnot, try both DSLR and SLR-like cameras. See which one satisfies you in terms of image quality, ask the guy/gal who works there about lenses and such.

somebody mentioned a 17-200 tokina (i think it was tokina :p)...

i know you're not considering it so it doesn't really matter but if you were i'd discourage you.

it's a fact that the bigger the range the worse the image quailty and light power (that's probably not the right term in english but you get the idea).

the longer the range the more lenses it needs so the quality degrades.

fixed lenses are of the highest quality but that's not really very good for 'carry around'.

so if you can get the 18-55 for a good price go for it.

then again i'm no expert and if someone says i'm terribly wrong then they just might be right.

i myself am using a Canon EOS 20D with a Sigma 17-70 (new model...they say it's a lot better then the 'stuff' sigma used to make.) with macro and whatnot and allmost compares to similar Canon lenses.

Well my needs, good low iso performance and high image quality..

Thing is the only ones they have available here for "Testing" are the Rebel XT and nikon d70, no High End Pro-sumer cameras, hence why i'm asking here...

High ISO doesn't necessarily mean poor image quality. The D50 only has a minimum ISO of 200 while most Canons have ISO of 100. Regardless, both Nikon and Canon take great pictures. And believe it or not, Wal-Mart carries the D50 (and SLR-like cameras).

Well my needs, good low iso performance and high image quality..

Thing is the only ones they have available here for "Testing" are the Rebel XT and nikon d70, no High End Pro-sumer cameras, hence why i'm asking here...

Check pbase.com and see if the pro-sumer point and shoots meet your ISO and IQ expectations. IMO, ISO performance and image quality are two of major pros of DSLRs, but if you can live with what you see on pbase...

http://www.buydig.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=CNDRXT1855B

I bought my Canon 20D from here, did the free shipping and got it 4 days...

Sadly not in the US, So I guess the MIR doesn't apply to me :no:

somebody mentioned a 17-200 tokina (i think it was tokina :p)...

i know you're not considering it so it doesn't really matter but if you were i'd discourage you.

it's a fact that the bigger the range the worse the image quailty and light power (that's probably not the right term in english but you get the idea).

the longer the range the more lenses it needs so the quality degrades.

fixed lenses are of the highest quality but that's not really very good for 'carry around'.

so if you can get the 18-55 for a good price go for it.

then again i'm no expert and if someone says i'm terribly wrong then they just might be right.

i myself am using a Canon EOS 20D with a Sigma 17-70 (new model...they say it's a lot better then the 'stuff' sigma used to make.) with macro and whatnot and allmost compares to similar Canon lenses.

Odd you're the first person to not recommend getting a 17-200mm ( or similar), how come? Yeah I guess I'll be going for the 18-55mm, since the 28-80mm has only positive feedback on kenrockwell.com

High ISO doesn't necessarily mean poor image quality. The D50 only has a minimum ISO of 200 while most Canons have ISO of 100. Regardless, both Nikon and Canon take great pictures. And believe it or not, Wal-Mart carries the D50 (and SLR-like cameras).

I agree, atlhough High ISO would mean probably noiser images, which in my book are disliked :cool:

Check pbase.com and see if the pro-sumer point and shoots meet your ISO and IQ expectations. IMO, ISO performance and image quality are two of major pros of DSLRs, but if you can live with what you see on pbase...

Yeah been checking on pbase a lot, thanks to one of your posts back earlier in this thread.

Either way, I think I'll pick the D50, since the only pro-sumer fixed lens who gets good reviews against dSLR cameras is the Sony R-1 Costs over $900, which is WAY over my $700 budget.

Thanks for all your replies :D really helped toward my decision, anyway, in other question I'll be posting again for you thoughts/knowledge :)

Edited by maudit

Well after reading kenrockwells review @ KenRockwell.com, of the *ist DS, might go that way, not so sure yet, but the AA is a very good pro and the 11 AF points are nice as well, anyway, got a couple of weeks before pay day to decide + the "i'm sure I want it, but is it really what I want decision time...", Just updating what i've found that could be useful for others... I wish my local stores had more dSLR brands like olympus, pentax, etc. To try them out myself, but sadly, online reviews will have to do. We are so far behind in everything...

Can I ask you a question? Why low iso performance? Usually, ppl search for high iso performance since low light is often a problem.

D50 is known to be awsome at higher ISO with lower noise. But this is something very hard to see anyway IMO..

sorry my bad, I meant "low noise performance"... :wacko:

Been checking out lately the Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D any feedback on that camera? (aside it not being in production )

@lawtai! :woot: be sure to post pics of the camera, pics taken by the camera !

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!