entry level dSLR


Recommended Posts

the dpa account is the "Dell Preferred Account." It's basically if you have their credit card. Most people probably don't, so you won't get that extra 2% savings, which isn't that much. Still only about 540ish without the 2% savings. My guess is it doesn't last longer htan the week, but I'm sure dell will have the sale again in the future.

the dpa account is the "Dell Preferred Account." It's basically if you have their credit card. Most people probably don't, so you won't get that extra 2% savings, which isn't that much. Still only about 540ish without the 2% savings. My guess is it doesn't last longer htan the week, but I'm sure dell will have the sale again in the future.

they all say "expire: 00/00/00" Maybe forever :blink: ?

heh, I just picked up the d50 with the 18-55 lens for 575 after taxes. boo to them having a taxable location in NY.

(Y) good pick up mate!!!

aww boo, it's 6 weeks till delivery... oh well i'll just have to wait to get it i guess.

How come 6 weeks till delivery ? :no: that's roughly almost 3 months :pinch:

Argghhhh If I had the money right now... oh well hope it's still there by the time I get the cash...

I noticed that the "sale" they had is supposed to expire on 4/20, so I'm not sure what the price of the camera'll be afterwards. Hopefully I won't have to actually wait the whole 5 weeks before I get the camera, but if so, I'll just start reading up on how to use the camera.

Well i've been doing a lot of reading on the entry level dSLR's, most of them mentioned in this thread. Most important thing I read was " Are you planning on buying any more lenses after you purchase a dslr with a 18-55". My answer to that is leaning a lot towards no. And suggestions on many websites to that is, get a high end prosumer SLR-like camera. Like a Fujifilm Finepix s9000, Kodak p880, Panasomic FZ-30 and so on, The only thing holding me back on my final choice is image quality, which I know dSLR stand out in that area, But like I said before, I really don't think I'll be purchasing another lense after the one that comes bundled ( 18-55mm), Maybe a year after I actually buy the camera. So my question is, will the standard 18-55mm Fit my needs and be better off than those fixed lens slr-like cameras? And in terms of "lens capability" will I be better off with 18-55 or 28-80mm, Pink floyd repplied it's subjective, but I want to know experiences from you people who seem to have used these lenses a lot..

Edited by maudit

So my question is, will the standard 18-55mm Fit my needs and be better off than those fixed lens slr-like cameras? And in terms of "lens capability" will I be better off with 18-55 or 28-80mm, Pink floyd repplied it's subjective, but I want to know experiences from you people who seem to have used these lenses a lot..

What are your "needs?" Also, why don't you try both out before deciding instead of taking other ppl's word for it? If you're that stuck on the fence, go to your local Ritz Camera or whatnot, try both DSLR and SLR-like cameras. See which one satisfies you in terms of image quality, ask the guy/gal who works there about lenses and such.

somebody mentioned a 17-200 tokina (i think it was tokina :p)...

i know you're not considering it so it doesn't really matter but if you were i'd discourage you.

it's a fact that the bigger the range the worse the image quailty and light power (that's probably not the right term in english but you get the idea).

the longer the range the more lenses it needs so the quality degrades.

fixed lenses are of the highest quality but that's not really very good for 'carry around'.

so if you can get the 18-55 for a good price go for it.

then again i'm no expert and if someone says i'm terribly wrong then they just might be right.

i myself am using a Canon EOS 20D with a Sigma 17-70 (new model...they say it's a lot better then the 'stuff' sigma used to make.) with macro and whatnot and allmost compares to similar Canon lenses.

Well my needs, good low iso performance and high image quality..

Thing is the only ones they have available here for "Testing" are the Rebel XT and nikon d70, no High End Pro-sumer cameras, hence why i'm asking here...

High ISO doesn't necessarily mean poor image quality. The D50 only has a minimum ISO of 200 while most Canons have ISO of 100. Regardless, both Nikon and Canon take great pictures. And believe it or not, Wal-Mart carries the D50 (and SLR-like cameras).

Well my needs, good low iso performance and high image quality..

Thing is the only ones they have available here for "Testing" are the Rebel XT and nikon d70, no High End Pro-sumer cameras, hence why i'm asking here...

Check pbase.com and see if the pro-sumer point and shoots meet your ISO and IQ expectations. IMO, ISO performance and image quality are two of major pros of DSLRs, but if you can live with what you see on pbase...

http://www.buydig.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=CNDRXT1855B

I bought my Canon 20D from here, did the free shipping and got it 4 days...

Sadly not in the US, So I guess the MIR doesn't apply to me :no:

somebody mentioned a 17-200 tokina (i think it was tokina :p)...

i know you're not considering it so it doesn't really matter but if you were i'd discourage you.

it's a fact that the bigger the range the worse the image quailty and light power (that's probably not the right term in english but you get the idea).

the longer the range the more lenses it needs so the quality degrades.

fixed lenses are of the highest quality but that's not really very good for 'carry around'.

so if you can get the 18-55 for a good price go for it.

then again i'm no expert and if someone says i'm terribly wrong then they just might be right.

i myself am using a Canon EOS 20D with a Sigma 17-70 (new model...they say it's a lot better then the 'stuff' sigma used to make.) with macro and whatnot and allmost compares to similar Canon lenses.

Odd you're the first person to not recommend getting a 17-200mm ( or similar), how come? Yeah I guess I'll be going for the 18-55mm, since the 28-80mm has only positive feedback on kenrockwell.com

High ISO doesn't necessarily mean poor image quality. The D50 only has a minimum ISO of 200 while most Canons have ISO of 100. Regardless, both Nikon and Canon take great pictures. And believe it or not, Wal-Mart carries the D50 (and SLR-like cameras).

I agree, atlhough High ISO would mean probably noiser images, which in my book are disliked :cool:

Check pbase.com and see if the pro-sumer point and shoots meet your ISO and IQ expectations. IMO, ISO performance and image quality are two of major pros of DSLRs, but if you can live with what you see on pbase...

Yeah been checking on pbase a lot, thanks to one of your posts back earlier in this thread.

Either way, I think I'll pick the D50, since the only pro-sumer fixed lens who gets good reviews against dSLR cameras is the Sony R-1 Costs over $900, which is WAY over my $700 budget.

Thanks for all your replies :D really helped toward my decision, anyway, in other question I'll be posting again for you thoughts/knowledge :)

Edited by maudit

Well after reading kenrockwells review @ KenRockwell.com, of the *ist DS, might go that way, not so sure yet, but the AA is a very good pro and the 11 AF points are nice as well, anyway, got a couple of weeks before pay day to decide + the "i'm sure I want it, but is it really what I want decision time...", Just updating what i've found that could be useful for others... I wish my local stores had more dSLR brands like olympus, pentax, etc. To try them out myself, but sadly, online reviews will have to do. We are so far behind in everything...

Can I ask you a question? Why low iso performance? Usually, ppl search for high iso performance since low light is often a problem.

D50 is known to be awsome at higher ISO with lower noise. But this is something very hard to see anyway IMO..

sorry my bad, I meant "low noise performance"... :wacko:

Been checking out lately the Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D any feedback on that camera? (aside it not being in production )

@lawtai! :woot: be sure to post pics of the camera, pics taken by the camera !

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!