Recommended Posts

We're never going to see anything come of this like all the other 'alternative fuel' inventions. It seems every couple years or so, someone comes up with this new invention that gives an alternative source of power/fuel, it is then bought up by either an auto maker or the government then never seen again.

Also I imagine this needs distilled water, or at the very least some sort of clean water that does not come from a tap.

Plus you can make your own distilled water at home by boiling the water, then collecting the steam (steam is the distilled water). (Expensive as far as electricity on a large scale) but works in a pinch should say the new HHO station (water station to replace gas) ran out of water. :)

Plus you can make your own distilled water at home by boiling the water, then collecting the steam (steam is the distilled water). (Expensive as far as electricity on a large scale) but works in a pinch should say the new HHO station (water station to replace gas) ran out of water. :)

Also Illegal in the USA.. its illegal to own an operate a still...

Also Illegal in the USA.. its illegal to own an operate a still...

How do you figure? It is for the purposes of producing an alcoholic beverage, but not if end result is just going to be water. If you think about it, that would mean anyone using a kettle, iron, dishwasher, etc could be arrested and charged.

nah, you still need to produce the electricity for his special electrolysis process, no such thing as free energy :p

but its a nice way of carrying around compact fuel

"Free Energy" what scientists call "dark matter" does exist. You know all the energy released when an a-bomb explodes? That's what they call dark matter. Figuring out a way to harness it safely and use it as an energy source is where it gets tricky. If we could only manage to harness that in a good way instead of using it to destroy :no: It's been known for years that it could be used as an energy source. You're pulling the energy directly from the air...well everything around you actually. You can fart and power a house.

BTW there's been a few people in history to get a car running on only water. Weird thing is that they usually vanished after making it known to the government ;)

Here's another guy to have figured it out. Only this time it's known about publically. But what's the first thing the government wants it for? MILITARY USE :angry: Tell me that isn't BS

But if you own a diesel car just pour some french frie oil in the tank and there's you some fuel

Here's the deal...

Yes, by using electricity you can extract the Hydrogen from water leaving a waste product of oxygen (which as waste products go, isn't too bad).

Hydrogen can then be used to power a fuel cell vehicle like the forthcoming Honda FCX. Fuel cell vehicles also have very clean emissions.

The only problem is that fossil fuels are often used to generate the electricity used to power the process that separates the hydrogen from water.

If you want this to be a real solution (that actually reduces dependence on mid-east oil) then you would need to invest in greener electricity-generating options (solar, wind, hydro, etc...) to power the hypdrogen collection process.

Here's the deal...

Yes, by using electricity you can extract the Hydrogen from water leaving a waste product of oxygen (which as waste products go, isn't too bad).

Hydrogen can then be used to power a fuel cell vehicle like the forthcoming Honda FCX. Fuel cell vehicles also have very clean emissions.

The only problem is that fossil fuels are often used to generate the electricity used to power the process that separates the hydrogen from water.

If you want this to be a real solution (that actually reduces dependence on mid-east oil) then you would need to invest in greener electricity-generating options (solar, wind, hydro, etc...) to power the hypdrogen collection process.

That may be true, but at least it's cutting down on emissions from the consumer end. So essentially, it's a step in the right direction until somebody comes up with a way to generate the electricity without the fossil fuels.

"Free Energy" what scientists call "dark matter" does exist. You know all the energy released when an a-bomb explodes? That's what they call dark matter.

Dark matter isn't what's released in nuclear explosions. Dark matter is the yet unknown matter that causes graivty to hold deep space objects together, especially noticeable on a large scale. I.e. what holds galaxies together, as the observed matter is according to theories too small. Therefore, there must be a hypothetical "dark matter" as well.

The energy released when an atomic bomb explodes is rather well documented and understood and has little, if anything, to do with dark matter. It's mostly about thermal radiation and one can read more here.

And no, according to current theroies, free energy exist nowhere, not in dark matter, atomic bombs (these simply release potential energy in the atomic nucleus itself), or anywhere else. Free energy would violate very fundamental physical theories.

If we could only manage to harness that in a good way instead of using it to destroy :no:

That's called nuclear reactors. :p

That's controlled nuclear reactions, as opposed to the uncontrolled ones you're seeing in atomic bombs. Guess why these provide enormous amounts of energy from relatively little raw material. Nuclear reactors split atoms too, just like the bombs, but with humans in control, besides with meltdown disasters. ;)

Edited by Jugalator
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!