Lost - Season Three


Recommended Posts

Yeah...that was a pretty messed up at the end there. It would have been funny if they had her spring out at the last second of the episode. :p

I think Paulo would have died from so many bites. Nikki was only bitten once.

Edited by Rob2687

Paulo being buried alive I would of cheered by Nikki...come on she was hot...and that ends 2 characters that were so pointless :laugh:...even their flashbacks sucked...but maybe not as worse as Rose and Bernard's Episode!!!

If there was any good out of Nikki/Paulo flashback, it showed Ben/Juliet/Others were able to access the Pearl Station via some undergound pathway.

At least I wanst alone there...I didnt hear them come down the ladder...made me think of a tunnel...tho it didnt look like there was much space for a tunnel near the ladder

Holy crap! While it was certainly a jaw-dropper of an ending, is it going to play out to anything? I seriously doubt they'll live and crawl out of all that, and as long as that doesn't happen, no one will know the truth except for the audience.

Holy crap! While it was certainly a jaw-dropper of an ending, is it going to play out to anything? I seriously doubt they'll live and crawl out of all that, and as long as that doesn't happen, no one will know the truth except for the audience.

I cant see them going back to them...its closure I think...no more will people talk about Paulo and Nikki only in past tense :D

At least I wanst alone there...I didnt hear them come down the ladder...made me think of a tunnel...tho it didnt look like there was much space for a tunnel near the ladder

If I'm not mistaken, Ben made a comment about the hatch door being open.

If I'm not mistaken, Ben made a comment about the hatch door being open.

I have to admit I wasn't taking much notice...ha ha I was typing an email out at the time...wasnt to interested but the Pearl made me look :D...I'll re watch!!!

Well if they could get into Perl, then they could see everything that went down in the hatch. And probably fed info through the vacuum tube to the rest. Likely is why they know so much about them. Notice Ben didn't know much when he said he'd find out and exploit Jack. It was also the first time Juliet sees him. Makes you want to go back and watch what all happened in the hatch. It also makes sense out of the inputting numbers in the computer. That requires a lot of idle time in the Hatch where conversation that can be overheard will occur. And with the quarantine marking on the hatch door, that would influence people to stay in and be watched. The question becomes is this the original purpose or just a convenience for the others.

Did anyone notice the dog uncovering the bodies? He knew they were still alive. In the scene where the teacher talked about the spider did he say it was deadly or just a paralytic?

Well if they could get into Perl, then they could see everything that went down in the hatch. And probably fed info through the vacuum tube to the rest. Likely is why they know so much about them. Notice Ben didn't know much when he said he'd find out and exploit Jack. It was also the first time Juliet sees him. Makes you want to go back and watch what all happened in the hatch. It also makes sense out of the inputting numbers in the computer. That requires a lot of idle time in the Hatch where conversation that can be overheard will occur. And with the quarantine marking on the hatch door, that would influence people to stay in and be watched. The question becomes is this the original purpose or just a convenience for the others.

Did anyone notice the dog uncovering the bodies? He knew they were still alive. In the scene where the teacher talked about the spider did he say it was deadly or just a paralytic?

I didn't think about Vincent uncovering the bodies.

As far as the Pearl station, I don't see that as being how they found out about everyone. I mean, they knew a lot of information about Jack, and they were able to prove to Jack that the Red Sox won the World Series that year. I'm almost certain that they have other means of finding this information out, which we'll eventually find out later. Case in point: they got Locke's dad there. You can't do that with the Pearl station (not that we know of anyway) :p

I didn't think about Vincent uncovering the bodies.

As far as the Pearl station, I don't see that as being how they found out about everyone. I mean, they knew a lot of information about Jack, and they were able to prove to Jack that the Red Sox won the World Series that year. I'm almost certain that they have other means of finding this information out, which we'll eventually find out later. Case in point: they got Locke's dad there. You can't do that with the Pearl station (not that we know of anyway) :p

What if Lock's dad is the monster. That thing can imitate just about anything. Which fits in well with what Ben was saying, that it can show you whatever you want to see.

What if Lock's dad is the monster. That thing can imitate just about anything. Which fits in well with what Ben was saying, that it can show you whatever you want to see.

My only issue with this is what purpose would giving Locke an imitation of his dad be? How would giving him what will eventually dissipate help Ben convince him to stick around and tap into the island's special powers? If it was going to show his dad, why show his dad tied up and apparently beaten? Wouldn't having him standing there be sufficient?

I'm not saying you're wrong, it's just that it doesn't seem as likely as the Others having another method of getting off and on the island.

Plus, Ben told that guy to get the man from Tallahassee, which apparently is Locke's dad. Surely Ben wasn't saying, "Get the smoke monster and make it look like Locke's dad." To me it makes more sense that it really is Locke's dad. But hey, I've been wrong before :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!