Chris Pirillo says it like it is...


Recommended Posts

Yep right software update in linux is really easy, most of the time is not available or some other programs... you need to edit yum.conf, etc... really easy... nothing to say...

No, you need not edit anything. If you use a distro like Ubuntu (I'm guessing SUSE and others are probably very similar, I just haven't used them in a while), you can download and install software with one click. Everything has a UI, there is no configuration file editing necessary. In fact it's easier than Windows because the software is all in one spot and the installation is handled for you.
OSX maybe... but anyway you dont have this amount and quality of software, that you got on windows...
Perhaps you don't have the huge amount of software available, but probably 50% of the utilities and programs you can find for Windows are crap and don't do what they're supposed to do. I had better luck finding better quality programs on OS X than I ever did on Windows. But this point is probably somewhat subjective, so I'm not going to argue it any further.

[rant]

RC1 is a memory hog no doubt. How many boxes are still out there that have 512MB of ram or less in them?

A lot I would say and how many people that own these boxes will try to upgrade to vista? Not all of them but a few will and they'll find out how bad vista is when it comes to ram usage.

Just for the hell of it i installed vista on and athlon I have laying around that only has 512MB of ram.

Now on a clean install of vista it takes up over 70% of the ram has damn near 40 processes running and has 10,000+ handles going.

Now we know the os is lying about the processes cause there?s got to be close to 10 svchost.exe's running which all have more services hidden within them. Turn superfetch off and its no better it still hog's up the entire ram. Why does vista need all this sh*t on in the background and just what is going on that needs all of that running by default?

It may not be the next Windows ME but its going to be close. And I agree with Pirillo on the interface issues. For the normal user it's going to be 3.1 to 95 all over again. [/rant]

Now where did I put that Windows XP cd.

Maybe because it handles memory management differently?

Maybe because it uses up the ram for the system till programs need it?

Maybe because its better to use the ram for system processes than have idle wasted memory?

Get a clue please.

I like Chris Pirillo, but he is a total UI nazi. The under the hood changes of Vista make it a solid release, but I agree the UI looks and feels strange to me, but I think that's just because it is new to me. I'm not going to use Vista as my main OS until solid ATI drivers come out that can play certain games well.

Which games?

I agree. It's totally confusing for a new user of Windows or a new user of Vista from XP/2000/98 etc. I think the worst thing they have done is not include start menu icons for the different options. This slows down productivity because I have to spend 2 seconds actually reading the items instead of identifying them visually. I know this doesn't sound like a lot but throughout the OS there are inconsistences like this and these seconds lost mount up.

True say, i think they tried to make the UI as fancy as possible, they did well with glass and aurora but then thye just didnt know wat to do with the rest of it so went for something complex.Yes it takes much loner i feel to find wat u need in vista as much has changed, but i think we get use to it who knows.

Totally agree with him, Vista lacks a cohesive user experience / user interface. :yes:

It doesn?t look or behave similarly across any part of the operating system. Even more sad? That?s by design, folks.

Yu:yes:yes: he speaks the truth.

That's it. I'm selling my PC hardware. Time to switch. I had hopes for RC1 and they have been dashed.

I agree with Chris.

For example, we see windows with the titlebar text near the top edge of window, others do not have text at all, other have the titltbar text near the "back" button.

Some windows have a large titlebar, some others have a small titlebar. Some windows do not have menubar, some others do. Also, you can have all your glassy windows looking very light, but you maximize them and dang, all black. Even colors are inconsistent. Dark taskbar vs light window borders.

That trully sux. Vista UI is a disapointment.

If you take a look on Linux, Gnome is totally consistent. All Apps look the same, if you use the same toolkit. For example, on my Ubuntu system I only use GTK apps, so, all my desktop and apps look exactly the same. And I like that.

Also, even OSX two-themes seem more cosnsistent than this thing. At least they go well together.

For god sake! 5 YEARS of development, and they could not a) implement their own ideas, figuring on early concepts, b) make everything look consistent and c) take that lousy 1995 dialogs?

[rant]

RC1 is a memory hog no doubt. How many boxes are still out there that have 512MB of ram or less in them?

A lot I would say and how many people that own these boxes will try to upgrade to vista? Not all of them but a few will and they'll find out how bad vista is when it comes to ram usage.

Just for the hell of it i installed vista on and athlon I have laying around that only has 512MB of ram.

Now on a clean install of vista it takes up over 70% of the ram has damn near 40 processes running and has 10,000+ handles going.

Now we know the os is lying about the processes cause there?s got to be close to 10 svchost.exe's running which all have more services hidden within them. Turn superfetch off and its no better it still hog's up the entire ram. Why does vista need all this sh*t on in the background and just what is going on that needs all of that running by default?

It may not be the next Windows ME but its going to be close. And I agree with Pirillo on the interface issues. For the normal user it's going to be 3.1 to 95 all over again. [/rant]

Now where did I put that Windows XP cd.

As to the RAM usage issue: Vista obviously assigns RAM much more efficiently than XP does. How else is it possible that it's noticeably faster at multitasking than XP is, even with 'only' 512 MBytes of RAM?

The one that kills me with Vista is that if you open the Windows Photo Gallery and WMP11 you'll find a load of wasted space at the bottom of the window, in WMP11 you can grab that space and move the app around but with Windows Photo Gallery you cannot. That's a true indication that things really aren't linking together.

What i hate is the new all programs inside the start menu thing. I have to scroll down to see all my program folders, whereas when it opened out i kinda remembered where each was. Also the network panel, network centre and network connections annoys me. It shows useless information and you have to dig to find what xp practically gave you.

I always find it strange when some people say who cares what the UI is like. Unless you're using your PC for coding or something like that I think it's one of the most important aspects of the OS, only security being more important.

If you are like the average computer user who uses their PC for e-mail, web browsing, IM, photo editing and gaming the UI is extremely important, who wants to look at an ugly UI for hours? Now I'm no Mac fan boy but I find the OS X UI very pleasant, I'm not saying it's perfect but it is nice. I don't know what to make of Vista yet , there are aspects of it that I like (the way windows slide open smoothly, and parts of it that I absolutely detest like how the taskbar turns black when a window is maximized. It is really a hodge podge of different looks, sort of like a lot of people had their hand in it and there was no one final decision. I think Microsoft isn't sure how Vista should look itself. Just one example, in Windows Calendar there is the ugly blue bar which looks terrible. At least they could have made the color user changeable.

But by far the biggest crime is the black maximize window issue, for the life of me I will never understand how that made it into Vista. I really want that addressed.

sad to say but it's true... Chris hits the spot.

all MS fanboys can now go to bed...

You sir are the worst type of neowinian. Posting a flippant remark with no sources, quotes or anything worthy of merit and it seems your only point was to start a war. I see great things for you.

What i hate is the new all programs inside the start menu thing. I have to scroll down to see all my program folders, whereas when it opened out i kinda remembered where each was. Also the network panel, network centre and network connections annoys me. It shows useless information and you have to dig to find what xp practically gave you.
That's a perfect example of people "not getting it". You're absolutely right in what you say, if you had to keep doing things the way that you've always done it. Normally when you go to the Programs menu you know what you want to run, right? Well, try typing it into the search. You want to run Word? Just type "Word" in the bar. Vista is making a lot of things different, which is why people are complaining. Just try the new way. 2-3 years from now everyone will be used to the new and better way of doing things in Vista.

I know people will say "why do I need to use the keyboard!!!111!!". Just try it. Press the Windows key on your keyboard (after all, you are using it if you're posting here) and start typing. Tell me that isn't faster than searching for the program in the Programs Menu. If you have a program you use a lot, pin it.

who in the world is Chris Pirillo? lol anyway that's just his personal opinion, I think Vista's interface is vastly superior to the XPs one, right now every time I log into my XP partition I just stay there a few minutes, you simply can't stand it after you try Aero Glass for a while, Vista's GUI is so smooth, most people who complain do it because they have slow machines where Vista is not performing nicely or they have video cards which do not support all the effects etc, others have just seen screenshots without actually trying it, let alone the superiority related to security, Vista is such a vast improvement over any other Microsoft operating system that I don't understand why people complain so much. My advice, wait for RTM to give final judgments, and be sure your PC meets and exceeds Vista's minimun hardware requirements.

Vista won't fail but it will be another Windows ME and everyone knows it.

Nope. It might be more of a new Windows 2000 than ME. We're not talking about yet another operating system built on top of 98 with System Restore, Movie Maker, a new funky WMP slapped on top of it, and DOS shoved under the carpet - and calling it 'new'.

someone that has the benefit of being in the inner circle of Jim Alchin, that's who Chris Pirillo is. So you can laugh out loud all day and night long, it doesn't change the fact that deep down inside Alchin and the rest of the crew at MS know they screwed up royaly with Vista. Instead of using 5+ years of development time to truly revolutionize the OS world and show the world that MS does in fact still have the best and brightest, they are releasing an OS that apart from the most obvious changes amounts to nothing but a silly cartoon on Friday night.

EDIT:

PS: the UI inconsistencies across all levels of Vista are so gregarious that I have to ask myself how it is possible for project managers to sign off on the code their team submitted. It's absolutley insane!

who in the world is Chris Pirillo? lol

Edited by blitzableiter

Take a look at this:

http://winsupersite.com/images/showcase/rc1_11.jpg

The window icon is inline with the back button. No front button. The window title is near the back button as well. And look at so much wasted space!!!!!

This is just a example why Vista GUI sux IMHO.

Also take a look at this:

http://winsupersite.com/images/showcase/rc1_12.jpg

Why did they don't add some window title to explorer. Even if it was not a Path, I would like them to put "Windows Explorer" text on that empy space.

Why Media player has a "tab" like menubar, and Explorer don't?

And I hate that new simbol they are using for Aero. And they are using it everywhere.

Edited by rjtd

http://winsupersite.com/images/showcase/rc1_11.jpg

The window icon is inline with the back button. No front button. The window title is near the back button as well. And look at so much wasted space!!!!!

This is just a example why Vista GUI sux IMHO.

Also take a look at this:

http://winsupersite.com/images/showcase/rc1_12.jpg

Why did they don't add some window title to explorer. Even if it was not a Path, I would like them to put "Windows Explorer" text on that empy space.

Also, why didn't they remove all the menubars for all apps, or make them on everytime on all apps? Why Media player has a "tab" like menubar, and explorer don't?

Yeah, when I was setting up speech recognition, I wanted to redo something, and looked next to the Next button for the Back button, but it wasn't there! I ended up redoing the whole wizard, only later noticing the back button all alone, hiding.. :wacko:

Win95 was more revolutionary UI and OS wise, and they did it in less than five years.

It is kind of sad that the biggest company in the world (not just software) cannot make the greatest UI out there.

Next time, I guess they would be better by outsourcing the UI design to someone else, and not to Microsoft Design team.

BTW, Zune interface is just becoming a disapointment. And OFFICe UI looks like an application for kids.

Why on the Earth do Office Teams and Vista Teams do not communicate? For example, Office team thinks that a TAB UI is better for productivity. But if you look at vista, only Media Player is using that tab approach. So, what is better?

I said it before but here goes. You 10 or 15 whiny little geeks are the minority. You are not the target audience for this OS. You people can't stop crying long enough to realise this I guess. Oh well, what's mommy making for dinner tonight?

I said it before but here goes. You 10 or 15 whiny little geeks are the minority. You are not the target audience for this OS. You people can't stop crying long enough to realise this I guess. Oh well, what's mommy making for dinner tonight?

lol wow

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!