Chris Pirillo says it like it is...


Recommended Posts

well it's rather obvious that Vista is intended for people just like YOU, ie. the ones that think that MS God's gift to mankind.

ignorance is bliss as they say...

PS: anyone with subtitles such as "Punk Ass Bitch" must be suffering from some inferiority complex otherwise I don't see why you would want the world to know how "tough" you are.

I said it before but here goes. You 10 or 15 whiny little geeks are the minority. You are not the target audience for this OS. You people can't stop crying long enough to realise this I guess. Oh well, what's mommy making for dinner tonight?

I said it before but here goes. You 10 or 15 whiny little geeks are the minority. You are not the target audience for this OS. You people can't stop crying long enough to realise this I guess. Oh well, what's mommy making for dinner tonight?

and who is the target audience for this os then; oh mighty one?

Sad thing about this, is that they redesigned that UI parts that are inconsistent.

I would accept that older apps, unchanged, would run differently than the rest.

But they redesigned them, and they didn't even care to make them behave the same way, or have the same layout and colors.

They even go againts their UI guidelines.

Sad thing is that Vienna is years away, and prob will be another disapointment.

I'm not a MacOSX fan, but I admit that even their inconsistency is better than MS Inconsistency. At least all their themes are beatifull, non distracting and they don't waste space on my monitor.

I only have 1280x768 real estate, and that will be filled with empty window titlebars! What is the use of empty titlebars? I really don't get this. Ohh! That way we can see that glassy effect. Yeah, that is really what I always wanted to do with my screen space.

http://winsupersite.com/images/showcase/rc1_11.jpg

Fugly. Colors are darker than the explorer windows. So much wasted space. chavo, can you please tell me what would you do with that empty space on the titlebar?!

Win95 was more revolutionary UI and OS wise, and they did it in less than five years.

It is kind of sad that the biggest company in the world (not just software) cannot make the greatest UI out there.

Next time, I guess they would be better by outsourcing the UI design to someone else, and not to Microsoft Design team.

BTW, Zune interface is just becoming a disapointment. And OFFICe UI looks like an application for kids.

Why on the Earth do Office Teams and Vista Teams do not communicate? For example, Office team thinks that a TAB UI is better for productivity. But if you look at vista, only Media Player is using that tab approach. So, what is better?

I can only assume you haven't actually tried the Office 2007 UI? Because if you had, you wouldn't have just said such a silly thing.

Can no-one get it into their heads that different programs need different UIs. What works for Office 2007 obviously won't work for folder windows, because it just doesn't. The same goes for Media Player - if it had an Office 2007-like UI, it would be a waste of space. If it had an explorer-like interface, people would complain that it was too complicated and/or boring.

Think about it for a few seconds. Notice how everyone doesn't live in identical houses, drive identical cars, eat identical food? It's because people need different things, and so do programs.

And before someone makes a smartassed reply, no, I have not just said the Vista UI is perfect. However I will say it's not the failure some of you want to believe. Just like you want to believe Microsoft is evil and incompetent. If you're so good, why don't you submit an application to them to help them out? Maybe you could send them some ideas of how to improve it? Problem is, you won't .. will you?

Edited by Kirkburn

I'm not talking about the UI layout because I like that new tab disposal.

But I hate that color scheme and that glassyness. It looks like a toy. But it is where I will do most of my work. I don't want a work tool to look like a playground for kids

Kirkburn, I will give you an example about the second thing you said. Windows Media player also has that tab like menu. But when you click in them, a menu comes up. In Office, the options that were staying in a menu are in the tab! But tabs on Windows Media Player and Office look the same. But they behave differently than Office tabs.

Also, if you use a bar on the same place and with the same funcionality, why will you make it darker on one window and lighter in another?! That is another example. Look at explorer toolbar and Calentar bar. Same functionality, different colors. Why?

But yeahhh, maybe I'm asking too much. It is very sad that I will be keeping XP and will not be able to use the new security features, new DX10 games and new TCP stack, because I refuse to use such a GUI, and surelly I will not pay for this crap.

Even that fake one everybody was talking about this week looked better than Vista!!! Even that little concepts from MS Design looked better than Aero!!!! MS couldn't implement their own designs!

A thing that even Novell, with very little manpower and money, did! And they even managed to do a DWM like Xserver quicker than MS and their Vista stuff, with only one guy working on it.

Edited by rjtd

When you actually use the UI, it really doesnt suck that much, many of the inconsistencies arent that bad, I think we're all looking in the wrong areas here.

My problem is things like the control panel - the interface seems pretty random, im not sure why they've split things into explorer type windows instead of tabs, they could have put some WMP style tabs on the green option bar at the top of the window, to navigate the display area for example.

Not to mention the green utility bar at the top of the explorer Windows strangely does not complement the light blue gradient of the file-info section at the bottom. Whats this all about?

Another thing is the column on the left of control panel windows, that random blue/green gradient, whats going on there? It looks horrible. Im dissapointed by RC-1, I would have liked to see some of these UI 'fit and finish' updates, it just seems so late in the game to be changing things around before RTM.

Although the good news is that Alchin confirmed in his 'RC-1 Speech', that fit and finish updates would be coming in the interims before RTM. Now we've seen some of the cleaned up UI screenshots on the Microsoft Design websites (see Long Zhengs blog) so hopefully we will see these by next release.

Otherwise, its not that bad. I actually found the pre-RC1 quite easy to use, I was suprised with the updates from Beta2, the whole thing was quite visually appealing and easy to use, I liked it.

Chris Pirillo is partly right in his blog, there are some inconsistencies in the UI. But this is the first i've heard of this illusive guy - and I lost faith in his reportage as soon as a read the title of his blog post on this subject. Unlucky for him.

I think the bottom line is: What can you do in Vista that you can't already do?

If you can't come up with a good answer for the type of things you do, then Vista is not worth it.

It all depends on the individual and their particular needs.

In other words: You're not going to invest in a new computer if your current one does everything you want and more.

Oh, and for those gamers that say that they need DirectX 10, the argument doesn't hold any water. You have to understand that DirectX is simply an API. Any good programmer can write code that has equivalent functionality in DirectX 9, OpenGL or direct GPU progamming.

I have used vista for months now as a main os, the UI doesn’t suck at all, UAP needs to be done with but the average computer user can disable that in less than 3 clicks.. The start menu is far superior to windows xp, as mentioned before press windows key and type name of app, or irc://irc.efnet.net - I do that all the time! Saves lots of time and is really fast, As well I’m growing fond of the expanding menus within the start menu, it was awkward for a week or so but now it’s very easy and smooth.

There are problems with the UI yes, but this is RC1, it will be fixed no doubt before RTM.

For all of those who say linux is far better, you are clearly in denial. First of all I’m not an advanced linux user, but I’m not a novice user as well, ubuntu linux is more easy than other distros but its still a pain in the ass, and is no WAY practical for the average computer user. ATI driver support is in the garbage, I had to watch movies at 10 fps, not cool.. Had to edit my xorg config for resolution at least 4 times.. Now someone tell me a right click resolution change for linux????

You cant..

and yes after a while you get used to linux but, this is FAR FAR FAR from acceptable for an average user , so all the linux people saying that its better than VISTA please shut your mouth because you sound defensive and stupid.

And in my honest opinion KDE is the worst UI I have ever used.

The UI is not revolutionary and I think that is the problem. You think after 5 years (I know the reasons why it took this long but the average Joe doesn't) that it would be better. You know yesterday I was trying to find out where the hybernate was located, "previously" it was with Display. Of course now there is no display, and it didn't occur to me until I read every icon text to see it was under Power, duh!

Remember the early video of Longhorn? With icons flashing, and wild animation? Nothing of that is here. It's like were on a tight deadline and let's make it like a WindowsBlind (insert trademark here) extension. Why are we exactly running the desktop in 3D anyway? What do we see that a 2D desktop that we all have been using since who knows when.

Admittedly, its only RC1 and unlike other companies RC1 is not RC1, so MS still has time to change things. But something you just wonder. Like why show transparencies on windows, just so when we maximize it, the bar becomes solid?

Don't get me wrong, I will be one of the first to purchase Windows Vista Ultimate when it comes out, just for the security alone. But after 5 years it is a disappointment. I know some people mentioned Office 2007, I been testing that, and the difference between that and 2003 is astonishing. Things that I couldn't do because I had no idea where it went was easily displayed and understandable with its large and easy icons.

To bad the Office 2007, couldn't have really make Windows Vista.

The one that kills me with Vista is that if you open the Windows Photo Gallery and WMP11 you'll find a load of wasted space at the bottom of the window, in WMP11 you can grab that space and move the app around but with Windows Photo Gallery you cannot. That's a true indication that things really aren't linking together.

I've also noticed that, it's quite annoying.

I think the main problem with Vista's UI is that it has so much potential that everyone knows it could be so much better, and in the end it's very disappointing. This is not going to have nearly as much success as Windows 95 back in the day.

Vista UI team should take lessons from Office UI team, their UI improvements are the best I have seen from Microsoft in years, I love(d) the ribbon.

Really ? I find it looked better when it was blue and silver. Now with all this orange everywhere, I find it's UI to be even more confusing than Vista's.

Revolutionary UI? What do you want? Star shaped windows?. Most of you want is an all brand new OS, but come on people, that's impossible, not because Microsoft can't do it, is because Microsoft don't wanna do it. The legacy support would be hurt, at least 50% of Windows users are retarded about computing thing, If you change to much an OS the people will running away of it.

Most of the people that post in the topic are "GEEK" or something like that, the point of view of you represent, I don't know... Maybe 10-20% of computer users?

Anyway, who's C. Pirillo? Is a Computer Evangelist? Come on, think by yourself. Don't hate make peace. Look the positive things not the bad things.

There are two functions or two ways to do OS. The one way is to follow OSX principle where every app looks almost exact same. The other principle is Vista where each app brings its own look and feel and functions. You people are not talking about kernel, updated NTFS etc, DX10.0...all those things will make Vista to outperform OSX and Linux...pretty much OSX and Linux are crap OSs....

As I said before OSX might look nice, but underhood is one big pile of **** which runs games for 50>% slower then Windows....

I don't think UI finalized...afterall...

I use windows classic look anyway...always did and always liked, simple, effective, slick. The best one was Windows 2000, had minor upgrades on top of Windows 95 look. The only thing which matters to me is Vista engine...

Edited by freak_power

I use Office 2007 everday at work on my main system...love it. But I cant make myself run Vista for more then a few day w/o getting UTTERY ****ed at the UI. its inconsistancies, waste of space, it is overall ugly IMO I typicly turn Aero off and run Vista Basic.

Grant it the technology in this release is a REALLY great thing, but I would honestly rather run the XP interface then Vista's.

I said it before but here goes. You 10 or 15 whiny little geeks are the minority. You are not the target audience for this OS. You people can't stop crying long enough to realise this I guess. Oh well, what's mommy making for dinner tonight?

Wow! The ego has landed!

If GEEKS are complaining about UI inconsistencies and general usability issues then what help have the moms and pops out there?

I must admit I found a few elements of the UI in pre-RC1 a little confusing and a fairly large departure from XP.. obviously we'll get used to it but people who're a bit newbie and are used to XP are going to struggle!

Can I just ask a question here (especially with those screenshots above) ... why does everything have to be new, exactly? The screenshots above show the information perfectly adequately.

Do you want speed, or fancy graphics in even the most trvial of locations?

Some people fail to see the point. It's not about vista having improved in matters of kernel, stability, etc. Or OSX having less software available than windows.

This guy is talking about the User interface!

Some other people go and say "vista lacks consistency", but the example they use is the menu bars have different colors (black in applications such as wmp or the picture gallery, and blue in applications like calendar and mail). That's the stupidiest point ever! If those menu bars behave the exact same, it's not that outrageous that they have a different color depending on the application. Anyway, those menu bars are not the same in all apps, and that's another story.

Look at office 2007. They pulled a completely NEW UI and it rocks, and yet is different than anything else done in windows before.

The fact is, vista UI is messy, and "illogical", in most of cases. It doesn't feel fight to me that the taskbar is translucent when the desktop can be seen, and not translucent when the window is maximized. But when I think about it, could it be any different? No. Because they abused the whole "glass" thing, and now everything is a mess.

First of all, many people have complained that it is now more difficult than ever to differentiate the focused window from inactive windows. And it's true, not much changes: the cyan border, the close button color and a slight change of transparency. The huge shadow in all windows don't go well with glass either. You don't feel the window on-top, "on-top" at all. In windows xp you do, even though it's all plain and with no fancy visual effects!

One thing I liked in XP was the left pane in explorer. It is huge, but it's useful some times. In vista it took me a while to find a method to make a new folder! (rather than right clicking).

And to all those complaining about old things still present, I'd say "If it ain't broken, don't fix it". It's fine that they update the icons, and stuff, but what kind of amazing things do you expect from the "add font" dialog?

They're definitely experimenting. In wlm, wmp11, ie7... you can see that they are trying to get rid of the menus. "File, edit, etc.." they want to make it a thing of the past. And what's the replacement for the menus? Icons!! I think there are many icons in the wmp11 library. On the other hand, in the management console, they updated all the icons and it's hard to difference all icons from the others. They look the same to me.

And yet in the start bar they got rid of all the useful icons in the right pane (computer, documents, pictures, etc).

The "all programs" menu also feels weird. I dont think it's a bad idea, but icons are way too small. Those fancy icons they've designed for vista are better for bigger sizes. There's not much you can do with 16x16 icons anymore.

Vista UI team should take lessons from Office UI team, their UI improvements are the best I have seen from Microsoft in years, I love(d) the ribbon.

(Y) Agreed!! :yes:

I think Windows won't have a decent UI until:

1. Microsoft fires all their UI Guru's

2. Jim Allchin leaves Microsoft / Windows Group

3. Steven Sinofsky takes full control of the Windows Group and releases Windows %codename% plus Point 1.

The target audience is still running the default blue Luna theme. :rolleyes:

I prefer it to Aero. :yes:

all i had to read is that chris pirillo thinks KDE/gnome looks, works, and feels better than Windows Vista and i understood immediately how distorted his perception is. the vista interface has a few problems in my view and they could have been more radical, but people are giving the UI far too little credit, its much much better than people are saying it is. in many ways its even better than the early Longhorn prototypes, and there are many aspects of the interface which are brilliant. there are some shortcomings, but i still believe the Vista UI to be the best on the market

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
    • 100 for the base game , 120 for pre release with bonus unlocked content (a pair of boil washed underpants for Trevor)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!