Chris Pirillo says it like it is...


Recommended Posts

I agree lets all go get Macs, who's with me!?

We can all buy Mac Mini's. There almost less money then Vista Ultimate alone!!

Who's with me?!

No one? Ok then I guess were stuck with Vista.

I do agree Vista looks like a cross between Windows 2000, WinXp and the Mac operating systems.

They have already started on SP3. All the fixes following SP2 (quite a lot of fixes in fact) are part of SP3.

SP3 won't be nearly as dramatic as SP2; SP2 was a rare exception in that it brought in a nice handful of new features to XP.

And IE 7, WMP11, etc would be included in SP3.

You whinning inbred idiots!

For god sake, would you rather just have XP re-skinned?

Vista is a large undertaking. It will overtake windows XP, which is the largest OS in use, with Microsoft accounting for 90% of the computer market.

Don't get me wrong, i like linux - but its not for everyone. I tried setting Ubuntu for some mates, and they hated it. They had pretty generic hardware but things weren't smooth at all. And alot of the programs and applications they liked just wouldnt run. They liked cedega but didnt see why they had to pay an annual fee for something which didnt run as well as it could on their windows partitions.

Mac OSX - perfect for "Some" people. Ie the people who just have a small task of things to do, ie Video editing, Audio editing, web browsing and some office work. For anything else i find Mac OSX to be very undesireable. Also i love building my own computers - its fun and i get to be in control, which is why i dont use Mac. I do however consider the macbook and macbook pro to be excellent, and with bootcamp they are very nice pieces of hardware, im saving to buy a macbook because i only need to web-browse and do some word processing.

Windows - love it or hate it, but its the ONLY OS that does it all right. It works on all 99% of the consumer hardware sold, it runs majority of the apps made, M$ created excellent APi's which help developers.

You whinning inbred idiots!

For god sake, would you rather just have XP re-skinned?

Vista is a large undertaking. It will overtake windows XP, which is the largest OS in use, with Microsoft accounting for 90% of the computer market.

Don't get me wrong, i like linux - but its not for everyone. I tried setting Ubuntu for some mates, and they hated it. They had pretty generic hardware but things weren't smooth at all. And alot of the programs and applications they liked just wouldnt run. They liked cedega but didnt see why they had to pay an annual fee for something which didnt run as well as it could on their windows partitions.

Mac OSX - perfect for "Some" people. Ie the people who just have a small task of things to do, ie Video editing, Audio editing, web browsing and some office work. For anything else i find Mac OSX to be very undesireable. Also i love building my own computers - its fun and i get to be in control, which is why i dont use Mac. I do however consider the macbook and macbook pro to be excellent, and with bootcamp they are very nice pieces of hardware, im saving to buy a macbook because i only need to web-browse and do some word processing.

Windows - love it or hate it, but its the ONLY OS that does it all right. It works on all 99% of the consumer hardware sold, it runs majority of the apps made, M$ created excellent APi's which help developers.

Hi welcome to NeoWhine! Great first post (Y)

UI is the latest thing on my list...and the retard like Chris can't see a lot. Nobody ever talks here about kernel, NTFS system, DX10.0, Full Backup feature....**** like i care how the OS looks. OSX might looks nice, but Mac OS was and it will be a crap..Windows outperforms OSX in every aspect...especially in gaming...

Btw I always use classic feel and look (windows 95)....

He mentioned a GNOME, KDE...give me a ****ing break...Linux is the most retarded OS....

Star Wars Episode I was a good movie...I don't know what was he expecting but...probably Saw II is good movie for him and people similar to him...

1) KDE and GNOME do not equate to Linux - KDE and GNOME are available on FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Linux, OpenSolaris.

2) What is wrong with GNOME or KDE? if you're running GNOME or KDE, with all KDE or GNOME applications, all of them integrate well into the desktop, infact, alot better than what Microsoft achieves; take a look at the consistancy of GNOME applications when running in GNOME for example.

3) I prefer the 'classic' look; give me a CDE like user inteface with vector based icons, and anti-aliasing for text, and I'd be a happy man (aka XFCE)

I agree!

OS X and Windows users always go on about how 'the Linux interface sucks' (even though Linux can look like anything you want), but Linux is the OS with vector based icons and nice effects using AIGLX and Compiz.

Linux isn't what it used to be. It's good.

That said, I do hope Vista turns out better than what most people are saying about it!

Some of you are way too anal about this. Who gives a crap if say the folder summary dialog box is still unchanged? Comments like this imo are pretty funny. I've been running Pre RC1 for the past week and I haven't once thought to myself that the UI is any way off like some of you are complaining. Yeah, there might be some slight inconsistency here and there but does that really warrant the panning of the OS?

Edited by AndyD

I don't think Microsoft could make a consistent Interface in an operating system. Windows is too big, too many fingers in the pie. Each group with its brilliant ideas. That's why Windows will never be consistent. :ermm:

Hey. When are Microsoft getting started on SP3 for Windows XP? :shifty: That's something I'm definitely interested in.

It is actually quite simple to get a consistent UI. First you have one group just working on the Windows API. Then you get the other groups just to use the API that the first group gave you. Microsoft has been telling developers for years just to rely on the Windows API and your application will look consistent w/ Windows. Too bad Microsoft can't take its own advice. It is really sad that Mozilla Firefox looks more consistent w/ the rest of Windows then Microsoft Office 2003 or Windows Media Player :p :puke:. I guess each group at Microsoft enjoys reinventing the wheel...no wonder it takes them so long to release anything.

I dont like vista, just feels bloated and wrong tried to like it (even on rc1 now) but cant much prefered the plex mockups they made a few months ago.

Feels like i can do a task quicker in xp maybe i just have to learn the menu setups but as it is vista is a pain in the ass and for me provides no benefits over xp with a good a skin. Hope it all changes soon i used love the xp betas

I agree!

OS X and Windows users always go on about how 'the Linux interface sucks' (even though Linux can look like anything you want), but Linux is the OS with vector based icons and nice effects using AIGLX and Compiz.

Linux isn't what it used to be. It's good.

That said, I do hope Vista turns out better than what most people are saying about it!

I'd prefer to say *NIX, and basically there are over 30 desktops out there, everything from XFCE which is an uptodate version of CDE using GTK+, XPDE which is a 'Windows XP Look-a-like' writen using Delphi on Linux, to KDE and GNOME, copying to varying degrees to Windows and MacOS X ideas.

Now, I'm not going to get on the bandwagon to declare one is better than the other, but I do think that the fanboys have a look, and actually realise that innovation doesn't stop at the doorsteps of Apple and Microsoft.

To me, Vista feels like a step in the wrong direction. I was hoping for a more polished, professional feel - one that I can be more productive in. Vista does not offer this. It's slower, bulkier, and its interface is not consistant. There's no reason for me to upgrade.

Most of those people probably haven't even tried it ... but self-satisfied "I could do this better than you" always takes over anyway. :|

Well, being a Beta tester, I can say that I use Vista, now with RC1 and I'm not filled with joy about this new OS. It's going nowhere and it's a UI nightmare (go read the last post of Paul Thurrott in WinSuperSite.com). And RC1 (for me) is worst than Pre-RC1 5536, I get BSOD just by importing my MP3 inside iTune, and BSOD on my laptop because it fails to go out of sleep mode. Lets not forget that dam UAC that gives me errors while reading/writing on my D:\ partition. Never had any of those problems with XP.

If you're a real Beta tester, just go read the many beta newsgroup, I'm not the only one with problems. And they call this RC1... It's a joke.

Vista, for a 5yo OS in developement, feels very incomplete and heavy. I'm looking forward to the SP1 or even then NEXT release of Windows (Vienna).

Well, being a Beta tester, I can say that I use Vista, now with RC1 and I'm not filled with joy about this new OS. It's going nowhere and it's a UI nightmare (go read the last post of Paul Thurrott in WinSuperSite.com). And RC1 (for me) is worst than Pre-RC1 5536, I get BSOD just by importing my MP3 inside iTune, and BSOD on my laptop because it fails to go out of sleep mode. Lets not forget that dam UAC that gives me errors while reading/writing on my D:\ partition. Never had any of those problems with XP.

If you're a real Beta tester, just go read the many beta newsgroup, I'm not the only one with problems. And they call this RC1... It's a joke.

Vista, for a 5yo OS in developement, feels very incomplete and heavy. I'm looking forward to the SP1 or even then NEXT release of Windows (Vienna).

;) Tell me about it, Windows XP installs on my AMD / Nvidia based PC with 3GB DDR without a hitch and Vista stumbles, trips - exit stage left, dies with a BSOD. Definately not something that should be happening with an RC1 build - Beta 1 perhaps, but not RC1.

I feel Microsoft have squandered an amazing opportunity.

Like I've said time and time again, who hired these Interface Design folks at Microsoft? :blink:

I'd prefer to say *NIX, and basically there are over 30 desktops out there, everything from XFCE which is an uptodate version of CDE using GTK+, XPDE which is a 'Windows XP Look-a-like' writen using Delphi on Linux, to KDE and GNOME, copying to varying degrees to Windows and MacOS X ideas.

Now, I'm not going to get on the bandwagon to declare one is better than the other, but I do think that the fanboys have a look, and actually realise that innovation doesn't stop at the doorsteps of Apple and Microsoft.

You're correct. Sorry about that ;-)

However, my point still stands :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!