Do you pee in the shower?


Do you pee in the shower?  

591 members have voted

  1. 1. Yes or No

    • No
      201
    • Yes
      390


Recommended Posts

urine is sterile, it's not any dirtier than the tap water you're showering in...

Yep

Pee (apparently) can be nutritionally beneficial to the body in some ways if you drink it. This would be in an emergency though of course, if you needed liquids when you were stranded out at sea or something. I remember my first experience of America when I arrived in a hotel with my parents in LA, aged 5, going straight to the TV and turning it on to see some guy stranded at sea on a raft p*ss into a cup then drink it.

God bless America.

Can do it, but woul;dnt make it my golden lager

If you think that pee is the most disgusting thing in the shower you got problems. For those who use shower curtains those things contain so many germs. There were tests showing shower curtains can contain ecoli.

Exactly.

A toilet seat, shower curtain, kitchen bench and sink, garbage bin, heck and worst of all, your mouse and keyboard have far far more germs then ya urine.

And yes, if the need is there, then of course. Its also a good mould remover :rofl:

I pee in the shower all the time.

When the drain gets blocked a bit and it takes longer for water to drain away, I just make sure to pee as soon as I get in so I don't end up standing in it.

I don't care about it running down my legs because the shower is running and water washes it away straight away.

No.

It may all go down the same way, but the germs in urine ... in a "clean" place like a shower?

NO.

Urine is sterile, unless you have something wrong with you.

why not? everything that was 'dirty' from it gets cleaned and drained in a matter of 10 seconds lol

Exactly!

Unless your shower drain is blocked....... :pinch:

Urine is technically sterile, but it's full of Urea, which is a poision. That's why we pee in the first place ;)

Did it do any damage to your bladder and urethra as it came out? No...so what damage do you think it's going to do if it hits your skin for a nanosecond before being washed away.

Your skin is like a huge body apron that protects the insides from yucky stuff. It will stop the urine getting back inside....meaning no damage!

If you think that pee is the most disgusting thing in the shower you got problems. For those who use shower curtains those things contain so many germs. There were tests showing shower curtains can contain ecoli.

I say. I can't believe people are so squeemish about their bodies. A bit of urine touching your feet (and legs for women) is not going to do you any harm. It's a good job most of these guys don't have to deal with periods every month. Can you imagine them with babies and childbirth .... lol ....

I read somewhere awhile back that its supposed to be healthy for your feet :)

Of course, that could be utter BS.

Seriously, why the grossness? Its sterile.

If you think that pee is the most disgusting thing in the shower you got problems. For those who use shower curtains those things contain so many germs. There were tests showing shower curtains can contain ecoli.
That said, I'd rather take my chances with a shower curtain sandwich than **** on the rocks. ;)

No.

It may all go down the same way, but the germs in urine ... in a "clean" place like a shower?

Ah, how little you know. Urine is actually quite clean (except in disease states). In fact, if you've got "germs" in your urine, you've probably got a urinary tract infection, which can be quite painful and dangerous (it'll **** your kidneys). Further, I would say that a "clean" place like a shower is, in fact, significantly more contaminated with bacteria and other pathogens than is your urine. Even further, I would propose that you're much more likely to get an infection from a doorknob than you would from drinking urine.

Feces, on the other hand, contains persistent bacterial presence (ie normal flora). That's why women should always wipe front-to-back, not the other way around.

i pee in teh shower and iam proud, sometimes even do a number 2 and squish it down the drain with my feet

That's one of the funniest things I've ever read on on Neowin :laugh:

But now I'll have this weird image of that in my head all night.

Question:

What if there's corn in it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!