Recommended Posts

No offence to some, but I really cant see how you can say it looks like he is saying Six, everyone I went with said it was Six, the positioning of his mouth when he says it, as shown in the .gif and movie, is Six.

I really don't see where people are getting ten from.

On a different point, Hope Morgan Freeman is better soon, I've really liked his character in the movies so far, and would hate for him to not be in the next one too.

The decision of the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) to issue a "12A" rating to The Dark Knight that allows it to be seen by children 12 and under if accompanied by a parent has been denounced by members of both the Conservative and Labor parties.

Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith wrote that he was "astonished" by the "relentlessly violent" nature of the film when he went to see it with his 15-year-old daughter.

"Unlike past Batman films, where the villains were somewhat surreal and comical figures, Heath Ledger's Joker is a brilliantly acted but very credible psychopathic killer, who extols the use of knives to kill and disfigure his victims during a reign of urban terrorism laced with torture," he remarked.

Labor MP Keith Vaz, commented, "The BBFC should realize there are scenes of gratuitous violence in The Dark Knight to which I would certainly not take my 11-year-old daughter."

But Sue Clark, a spokeswoman for the BBFC, responded that the film was "a fantasy movie with only implied violence." She added that if the board had raised the classification, "We would have ended up with far more complaints from people who wanted to see the film and couldn't."

/source

Implied violence? You see Batman knocking seven bells out of the Joker in the interview room, you see the Jokers "magic trick", several people get killed during the film and what about Harvey Dent's face? It looked awesome but it was very graphic. I'm not knocking the film in any way because of the violence but I was very suprised to see that it had been given a 12A certificate. How many unsuspecting parents took 8 year old little Johnny to see it completely unaware of the scenes it contained? Not everyone knows what level of violence it has.

Implied violence? You see Batman knocking seven bells out of the Joker in the interview room, you see the Jokers "magic trick", several people get killed during the film and what about Harvey Dent's face? It looked awesome but it was very graphic. I'm not knocking the film in any way because of the violence but I was very suprised to see that it had been given a 12A certificate. How many unsuspecting parents took 8 year old little Johnny to see it completely unaware of the scenes it contained? Not everyone knows what level of violence it has.

While Dent's burn was graphic, nothing else was in the violence. Sure, a pencil went into the guy's head, but it's not like we saw it in great detail, or when the black guy's throat or face was slit, or when people are shot, etc. That's how it's implied. I actually appreciate it because it's though it has violence, it's not glorified.

^^^Government should not have to come to the rescue because parents can't be bothered to do 5 minutes of research on the web.

-Spenser

While I appreciate what your're saying not everyone has the ability or even the knowledge to research a film. I'm not saying the film should have been a 18 because that would be stupid, I'm just suprised it wasn't at minimum a 12.

To put that worldwide number into perspective, the film hasn't even been release in some countries yet.

Here's the final release dates for those who live in areas that film hasn't been release in:

7 August 2008

Czech Republic

Hungary

South Korea

8 August 2008

Poland

9 August 2008

Japan

13 August 2008

France

Spain

14 August 2008

Russia

21 August 2008

Austria

Germany

Switzerland

Am I the only one who thought Batman's voice was just fine in the movie? He's constantly fighting and moving around and being Batman; he's going to sound a little breathless when he speaks. Plus, although Christian Bale is an actor, Bruce Wayne is not. At times he's going to mess up on his voice acting. It's more real that way. I understood every word he said, and I watched it at an IMAX theatre too, where the sound can get really loud.
I agree wholeheartedly. I don't see why people had a problem with it though I guess it's more because I listen to some death metal (it reminded me a bit of that) so I'm a lot more used to it. I thought it was a huge flaw to have the same voice throughout the older movies and nobody could put it together but whatever. I still enjoyed them for what they were. By the way, the whole IMAX thing is supposedly higher quality right? Will there be a lot of loss in quality when it's compressed for BluRay discs? Like I'm wondering if when I buy it in BluRay it will look as good as in the IMAX theatre or just the same as a regular one.
Warner Bros. Pictures' The Dark Knight climbed to 7th place on the all-time domestic blockbuster list on Tuesday, surpassing the first Spider-Man to become the biggest comic book movie of all-time in North America.

The Christopher Nolan-directed Batman Begins follow-up added $5.67 million on Tuesday to bring its massive total to $405.7 million after just 19 days. Spider-Man reached $403.7 million domestically during its entire run in 2002.

The movie will next target Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, which sits at #6 with $423.3 million.

23lgoe1.jpg

Read my mind. He says "six" to sarcastically give his concern, like "wow, six."

I have no idea why he would say 10. I highly doubt that he knows the officer he's talking to and who he was friends with, so how on earth would he know he's killed 10 of his friends? If you mean 10 officers, I think the Joker killed more than that.

How many times do I have to say.

He doesn't know how many friends he has killed.

He asks the guard, the guard says six.

The Joker thinks, hmmm, how many guards outside that cell I was in only a little while before. Oh it's 4. So the Joker adds 6 and 4, that makes 10. So the Joker says well it's about to become 10. This really aggrevates the guard because he is being completely undermined. He is stood there watching the Joker and as he is doing so the Joker is still killing. Friends is not just the guards actual friends, that would be propostorous. He means people working in the MCU.

If you watch the film, as I have numerous times as it's my job, 4 guards run into the cell with the guy with the phone in his chest, right before he explodes you see a close up shot of their 4 faces.

6 plus 4 equals 10.

I'm not even arguing that it most definately is 10 anymore, I'm just saying how is 10 such a ridiculous idea that you won't even consider it? It's not as if it could be likened to any number, only 6 or 10.

Edited by Smashing Pumpkin

I just got an email from Warner Bros.

Dear Kushan,

Thanks for your inquiry about that line in "The Dark Knight". Unfortunately, we think that anyone who is seriously debating this is one sad mother****er and needs to get out more, so we're refusing to tell you the real motive behind the Joker.

Instead, we're offering you all this advice - shut the **** up about it already, go out and get laid.

Yours sincerely,

-Warner Brothers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!