Recommended Posts

well just so you guys know the icons wern't the only thing updated, there is FINALLY a high resolution boot screen that matches the resolution of your desktop... be prepared for a suprise there ;)

Source? And how would it match the resolution of the desktop considering there is a limit of 256 colours to start with.

I understand they wanted consistent branding on the 'Windows' applications (translucent frames and flowers), but i kind of liked most of the old ones better, just because they were simpler.

they're not changing the monitor icon (as seen in the sidebar) are they? is that just for the sidebar icon?

has how the sidebar icon appears in the system tray different now, btw?

Source? And how would it match the resolution of the desktop considering there is a limit of 256 colours to start with.

The source doesn't need to be disclosed... as for the color limit, they completely reworked the boot screen process.. it is no longer limited at all, they load the graphics drivers first now, then show the boot screen, unlike before where it showed a limited common SVGA screen mode which only supported 256 colors... so now your boot screen will be like in Mac OSX where the resolution for it matches the resolution you specify as your desktop res

Source? And how would it match the resolution of the desktop considering there is a limit of 256 colours to start with.

Also, just to be clear: resolution and color depth are not the same. Resolution = # of pixels; Color depth = # of colors. So a high-res display could have a low color depth and vice versa.

The source doesn't need to be disclosed...

Then we don't to believe you (even though I do). You can disclose your general source without being specific. (ie "I got it from someone who works at MS")

The source doesn't need to be disclosed... as for the color limit, they completely reworked the boot screen process.. it is no longer limited at all, they load the graphics drivers first now, then show the boot screen, unlike before where it showed a limited common SVGA screen mode which only supported 256 colors... so now your boot screen will be like in Mac OSX where the resolution for it matches the resolution you specify as your desktop res

Well we would like a source to where you got this info. For all we know you could be pulling our leg and telling us what you'd like to see in vista.

Well we would like a source to where you got this info. For all we know you could be pulling our leg and telling us what you'd like to see in vista.

I don't want to get someone fired for leaking info, all I will say it is someone close to the UI code for Vista

well just so you guys know the icons wern't the only thing updated, there is FINALLY a high resolution boot screen that matches the resolution of your desktop... be prepared for a suprise there ;)

It's about time. I don't understand why they haven't done this earlier. Is it hard to load the graphics drivers early in the boot process?

The source doesn't need to be disclosed... as for the color limit, they completely reworked the boot screen process.. it is no longer limited at all, they load the graphics drivers first now, then show the boot screen, unlike before where it showed a limited common SVGA screen mode which only supported 256 colors... so now your boot screen will be like in Mac OSX where the resolution for it matches the resolution you specify as your desktop res

That sounds great, but wouldn't this kind of stuff be required to be in public test builds (RCx builds) so that it doesn't break apart various PC configurations?

That sounds great, but wouldn't this kind of stuff be required to be in public test builds (RCx builds) so that it doesn't break apart various PC configurations?

MS thinks not, it's one of the reasons we've seen those "placeholder" boot screens that were really just black with a progress bar in the old format, they pulled out the old images, and started to put in the stubs and interfaces for the new boot process, guess its just one of those things they wanted to keep secret until RTM to give people a suprise like the sound scheme and new icons.. the whole boot process in the beta's was just a place holder pretty much, they had new boot code for almost a year now, and have been testing it for over 2 years... as a "lab" so its been pretty well tested...

So just wondering... since you know someone in the UI department, any word on the motion desktop? Did it make it for RTM? I mean we heard one of the labs was working on it but no real definitive yes or no from last i knew....

I'm kinda super excited if they really are gonna pull off the full res / color depth boot process.... but im secretly hoping its also full motion to put apples little apple to shame hehe

Now I heard one of the new bulids features a whole new set of icons. I was over at Paul's site and found this graphic:

post-123716-1162235261_thumb.jpg

Could these be some of the new icons?

I like most of the new Vista icons, but those ones look like they were designed by Elton John. I think you all know what I'm implying...

This is making me really really laugh.

I can give you an easy source for the the fact that the bootloader contains support for more than 256 colors.

It's called load the freaking nogui option for the boot screen and you'll get a true color "aurora" static shot.

I mean come on guys this has been in there for well over a year now.

This is making me really really laugh.

I can give you an easy source for the the fact that the bootloader contains support for more than 256 colors.

It's called load the freaking nogui option for the boot screen and you'll get a true color "aurora" static shot.

I mean come on guys this has been in there for well over a year now.

You make me laugh, its 256 selective palette not True Colour....

You make me laugh, its 256 selective palette not True Colour....

Really? Evidently you haven't checked it properly.

It's 32bit alpha'd

Go back and play in your sandbox.

Also you can just hibernate the system and bring it back to see that it's not just 256 selective or otherwise.

you couldn't do all those shades, selective or not.

i do think vista will have a 32 bit boot screen....it's like 5 years from xp ....and they had the time to develop 10 boot screens ,not only one ...so it will be 32 bit for shure ... :D

I agree, and the fact they have kept it secret so long (kinda like motion desktop) just raises awareness of the fact its still not seen....

personally it would be sick to see something like the energy screensaver (modified of course) during boot

no they are making it for men and women without the need to overdose on testosterone lol wow the little screen in the icons has some countryside flowers, youd prefer megadeath perhaps? Its called icons that suit the general population without offending or displeasing any one set of people... flowers are pretty general guys may not specificlaly get gleeful at them but they arent gonna feel sick over them either.

Really? Evidently you haven't checked it properly.

It's 32bit alpha'd

Go back and play in your sandbox.

Also you can just hibernate the system and bring it back to see that it's not just 256 selective or otherwise.

you couldn't do all those shades, selective or not.

Post the actual Aurora screen, because I could swear the shading looked like this (this is NOT real, just a quick three minute job done in PSPX):

post-99705-1162419739.png

Are they making OS for girls, and gays? :blink:

:huh: I have absolutely no idea how a mix of blue and green, rampant glassiness, plus an icon with flower, has anything to do with girls and gays.

Unless you think everything must be manly by having a monotone coloured OS. :rolleyes:

it's common knowledge that orange is gay...let alone orange flowers. Obviously they should have made an icon set with just female butts and genitalia. Since hormonal teens and immature adults are the only ones that use computer's that would have been everyone happy. oh wait...

:rolleyes: seriously can people stop calling icons "gay"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!