Pirated Vista may be useless, Microsoft says


Recommended Posts

It is available legitimately for volume customers to download.

Vista can be installed without a key (there is one build in) then it is a 30 day trial before you have to enter a legitimate key (for the same Vista Edition you installed).

Wrong. It has -NO- key, it simply allows you to install, then put a key in before the 30 days are up. There's no "magical install key" that it puts in for you :p

they are full of it there are final vista out there and they are running it, there are a few that will be no good after they disable the beta codes or whatever but 90% of those I know using vista wont have a problem so they can tout that crap all they want.

Seriously, theres are a very small number of legit keys that have failed validation, MS have admitted that, but the other 99% of keys that fail are due to them being leaked or the user not knowing that they are running pirate software. the 20-odd boxes that you have had fail are either (1) running pirate versions (2)there using keys that have been leaked or (3) your full of it like most people who say "my legit key failed validation" bla bla bla.

Of course there would be no incentive for Microsoft to downplay the occurences of WGA false positives or anything like that right?

/sarcasm off;

Let's get real here. The problem of WGA false positives is for sure not as small as Microsoft will claim, neither is it likely to be epidemic. But the likelyhood of those 20 machines (from a company no less) failing due to use of pirated keys on those machines, or those keys leaking out over the Net is miniscule indeed. One might presume the company had more than those 20 PCs, all running on the same key. Much more likely is a simple case of WGA reporting a truthfully legit key falsely.

Microsoft is never going to give us the true numbers of WGA false positives or the true reasons thereof. It's simply not good business to do so.

Don't lie. Legit copies activate just fine. And if for any reason you change hardware several times in a short period of time, and need to reactivate, you can call Support and they'll activate you over the phone in a couple of minutes.

Uhm, no they don't. I have 2 retail copies of XP pro that don't. The first one wouldn't activate any more and the 2nd one was already blacklisted when I bought it from Best Buy. So no, not all legit copies activate just fine. I had an easier time with XP when I had the Devil's Own release.

Well the only people i see complaning here is the people that gets pirated copies.

Of course they will complained as per they might finally pay for something they take for granted.

On the other hand i do understand the fact that the price for there operating system is very high and i dont like myself paying does fee's.

But then again, if people would not have started cracking everything microsoft had put on the market we would not be at this point today. (WGA etc.etc.).

We look at microsoft and say they charge a lot for there operating system but why dont people look also at all the stuff they do for free for there operating system that it is actually required to play games ( DIRECTX ) and all the other stuff required for some apps.

And yes it cost a lot to do a operating system and yes they do have to pay the people coding it.

So giving a bit, should not hurt.

I am not a microsoft fan boy but i do admit that they are right when it comes to wga and all the other protecting stuff they input in there software.

If i dont want to pay for a operating system i go with linux. as per there is no need for cracking it.

And for does that still cry's out there if you dont like microsoft like you guys seem to make us think and if you are such a fan of linux or mac or any other operating system why is it you can't live without M$ software.

hahahahaha

Why do people keep saying "Vista will be cracked"...Vista is cracked. Its cracked and working fine. It works just like any other cracked version of windows in that you can't expect to install it and connect to microsoft and get updates as if it was a legit copy. But of course that will eventually be worked around as well, and even if its not they always release cracked versions of all the security patches and you can just download them manually

i can download all the updates and downloads off there site just fine....

i mean......... :shiftyninja:

lol @ microsoft

the day they let me buy a copy of windows for $400 and i can use it on at least 10 pcs then ill buy it, until then ill just try to get it some other way, education, free, from work, etc. They just dont get it, one PC is NOT enough, many people have more than 2 PCs at home. In my case i have 3 laptops and 2 desktops.

(and I yes i want Ultimate, i use IIS, backup, MCE, remote desktop and all that crap, so dont tell me i dont need Ultimate)

Agreed. I have several computers and I'm sure as hell not buying multiple licenses.

And for those people who like to not pay for something they use everyday, stop bitching you're getting something for free, stop complaining because you have to spend an extra 3 minutes running some other patch.

i havnt seen anybody b!tch about it. i know i wont

Well the only people i see complaning here is the people that gets pirated copies.

Of course they will complained as per they might finally pay for something they take for granted.

On the other hand i do understand the fact that the price for there operating system is very high and i dont like myself paying does fee's.

But then again, if people would not have started cracking everything microsoft had put on the market we would not be at this point today. (WGA etc.etc.).

We look at microsoft and say they charge a lot for there operating system but why dont people look also at all the stuff they do for free for there operating system that it is actually required to play games ( DIRECTX ) and all the other stuff required for some apps.

And yes it cost a lot to do a operating system and yes they do have to pay the people coding it.

So giving a bit, should not hurt.

I am not a microsoft fan boy but i do admit that they are right when it comes to wga and all the other protecting stuff they input in there software.

If i dont want to pay for a operating system i go with linux. as per there is no need for cracking it.

And for does that still cry's out there if you dont like microsoft like you guys seem to make us think and if you are such a fan of linux or mac or any other operating system why is it you can't live without M$ software.

hahahahaha

i think you need ms spellcheck. 'does'?

When you buy most software, they still are not yours. You only buy the right to use them on your computer. And by installing it you accept the licence agreement which one of says that MS have the right to install software to ensure the software is legit or other software to do with their software. Don't like it? Easy...don't install it and try a different OS.

WGA does not hurt legit customers, it hurts pirates. I am yet to see anything to do with WGA on my legit install of XP. So how is that hurting me? Pirates have to do some effort to get their stolen copy of XP to work like as if they bought it.

pirates are ALWAYs going to find a way around it and WGA and Activation just hurt those that purchased it as I've debated in the other thread about Vista RTM leaked that was locked.

pirates are ALWAYs going to find a way around it and WGA and Activation just hurt those that purchased it as I've debated in the other thread about Vista RTM leaked that was locked.

You do realize that without WGA and Activation, any idiot could get pirated Windows. You would have 10 people putting money together and buying one license and all using it. Licenses would be traded among friends like songs on limewire. Then Microsoft will see real declines in profits.

Of course it's not final code, and you'd have to be a complete moron to be using it!

Why do you think that it's not going to be commercially available for another 2 months? So that hardware/software companies have a chance to develop compatible software/drivers for the OS. This is a time period in which it actually becomes PRACTICALLY usable, and supported by manufacturers.

After this time period, there will be the development of updates. There will in all probability be around 30-40MB of updates available the second it is commercially available.

You do realize that without WGA and Activation, any idiot could get pirated Windows. You would have 10 people putting money together and buying one license and all using it. Licenses would be traded among friends like songs on limewire. Then Microsoft will see real declines in profits.

they dont make much out of regular people like us man, if they really wanted people to buy vista they can make it way cheaper, 400 for an OS is way too much!!! and yes i want ultimate as i said before

Of course it's not final code, and you'd have to be a complete moron to be using it!

Why do you think that it's not going to be commercially available for another 2 months? So that hardware/software companies have a chance to develop compatible software/drivers for the OS. This is a time period in which it actually becomes PRACTICALLY usable, and supported by manufacturers.

After this time period, there will be the development of updates. There will in all probability be around 30-40MB of updates available the second it is commercially available.

ummm it is the final code dude, rtm = release to manufact. meaning now thats up to them to do whatever they want with it.

they dont make much out of regular people like us man, if they really wanted people to buy vista they can make it way cheaper, 400 for an OS is way too much!!! and yes i want ultimate as i said before

Well I suppose you're right. Most of the money they make is from OEM.

Read your EULA again and then try to tell us you own their property. What you own is the media and a license. If you wanted to actually own Windows it would cost you more money then you'd ever see in your life.

Why don't you try to focus on the topic?

lol.... that was funny... i also agree that people need to buy it... if your gonna use it more than 10 times a day (i do) then just purchase it.. .its stress free and its the future... mp3's was downloaded all the time until riaa stop most of it.. now at least music sales have gone up.. im assuming same with vista... and other sofware

:woot:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!