Recommended Posts

Fair enough, thx for the info :) seems rather strange way of doing it though, so an upgrade can't do a fresh install like the XP upgrade could (when you prove you own a copy of the previous OS your upgrading from) and the full install can't upgrade...seems rather odd considering that RC1 could do a clean install or upgrade...guess MS want to make it clear that the Upgrade version is only for upgrading and the Full is only for a clean install I guess.

Nope you're still lost lol

Ok let me re-explain this.

The DVD's are identical, so they both function EXACTLY the same way.

The only way to access the Upgrade option from any Vista edition (Retail, OEM, Upgrade, ect.) is while inside of a Windows Environment, however the Upgrade option is only available on Windows XP, since you cannot Upgrade a Windows 2000 install.

Now on Windows 2000 what you have to do is boot up Windows 2000 and when inside of Windows 2000 choose to run a New Install, instead of an upgrade since it does not support Upgrades.

So to sum up, you cannot use the upgrade option from boot on any version of Vista, be it full version or upgrade version. The only way to use the upgrade option is from within a Windows XP environment. The New Installation option on an Upgrade DVD can only be ran from inside a Windows 2000/XP environment due to the key restriction. However on a full version DVD you can run the New Install option from boot.

Make more sense now?

So what's the best way to get Vista, legally and cheaply?

Have Windows 2000 legally and install Vista cleanly from an Upgrade edition of Vista? Doesn't that install freshly?

I don't care about my files/settings. They're backed up anyway.

Edit

Yes I think I'm right. I'll just have to install 2000/XP and have it activate etc, then decide to do a "full install" from within XP for example and off you go.

Edited by Huy

Nope you're still lost lol

Ok let me re-explain this.

The DVD's are identical, so they both function EXACTLY the same way.

The only way to access the Upgrade option from any Vista edition (Retail, OEM, Upgrade, ect.) is while inside of a Windows Environment, however the Upgrade option is only available on Windows XP, since you cannot Upgrade a Windows 2000 install.

Now on Windows 2000 what you have to do is boot up Windows 2000 and when inside of Windows 2000 choose to run a New Install, instead of an upgrade since it does not support Upgrades.

So to sum up, you cannot use the upgrade option from boot on any version of Vista, be it full version or upgrade version. The only way to use the upgrade option is from within a Windows XP environment. The New Installation option on an Upgrade DVD can only be ran from inside a Windows 2000/XP environment due to the key restriction. However on a full version DVD you can run the New Install option from boot.

Make more sense now?

So you can only clean install from boot or from within Win2k/XP, or upgrade from within XP (2k doesn't support upgrading) have I got it right this time? :unsure:

So you can only clean install from boot or from within Win2k/XP, or upgrade from within XP (2k doesn't support upgrading) have I got it right this time? :unsure:

Yes and no.

A clean install from boot is only supported on full versions. Upgrade versions will only work from within a version of Windows itself. That way they can guarantee that the copy of Windows that you're using to upgrade from is a genuine copy. They really don't have a way of doing that at boot time that's why it's not allowed on upgrade discs. Does that make a little more sense or am I still explaining it wrong?

By the way, I am dictating this using the new vista speech recognition tools. Isn't that cool?

So basically, if you should need to wipe your HD in the future and need to reinstall Vista, and you only have the upgrade version; you have to install XP first THEN install Vista?

That majorly sucks! Surely a better way is to allow the install from boot, but require the old product key be input as well as the new one, before it can be activated? Seems a much better way to do it.

Anything is just a MAJOR inconvenience to well.. 1000's and 1000's of people really!

So what's the best way to get Vista, legally and cheaply?

Have Windows 2000 legally and install Vista cleanly from an Upgrade edition of Vista? Doesn't that install freshly?

I don't care about my files/settings. They're backed up anyway.

Edit

Yes I think I'm right. I'll just have to install 2000/XP and have it activate etc, then decide to do a "full install" from within XP for example and off you go.

the easiest and cheapest way is to just get an OEM copy of Vista, and do a clean install

Atm, you can get OEM copies of XP Home for around ?60, while upgrade versions are around ?86. (FYI, the full version of XP home is around ?160 - just so you can see the difference).

However, the problem you may have is that OEM versions are tied to the motherboard they are first install on, and so if you change motherboards, you should have to get a new licence. Although some people have been able to activate an OEM copy of XP on a second motherboard.

So basically, if you should need to wipe your HD in the future and need to reinstall Vista, and you only have the upgrade version; you have to install XP first THEN install Vista?

That majorly sucks! Surely a better way is to allow the install from boot, but require the old product key be input as well as the new one, before it can be activated? Seems a much better way to do it.

Anything is just a MAJOR inconvenience to well.. 1000's and 1000's of people really!

Yes, that way they could also check if XP is legal. Having to install XP first, just to install Vista, is indeed very ugly.

It may be not as bad now where any sane person will still keep XP around until there's full driver and program support for Vista, but in a few years, this will be a serious pain in the a$$ :crazy:

I guess that makes sense (only allowing an upgrade/clean install from within the operating system environment) BUT BUT BUT how would users handle it if their copy of Vista got corrupted? How would they "repair" from the DVD? How would they run the Startup Repair tool?

Something's just not right here.

Welcome to the world of OEM OS installs. My previous VAIO PC only came with a set of three discs that images a copy of XP, with some of their bundled crap (the rest of their programs came on two other discs). That was my only solution to a botched XP install at the time. No option to boot off a disc into Recovery Console whatsoever.

They figure it's not worth their time to integrate their bundled software into the XP install discs, so they take a less messy approach. Bet they won't change their act with Vista either.

Yes and no.

A clean install from boot is only supported on full versions. Upgrade versions will only work from within a version of Windows itself. That way they can guarantee that the copy of Windows that you're using to upgrade from is a genuine copy. They really don't have a way of doing that at boot time that's why it's not allowed on upgrade discs. Does that make a little more sense or am I still explaining it wrong?

By the way, I am dictating this using the new vista speech recognition tools. Isn't that cool?

I think it does now, thx :)

Yeah that is cool :cool:

I still don't get it.

Have they changed the license again? Buying an upgrade version never meant losing some functionality (in this case, losing the ability of a clean install when you have windows xp).

What I mean is, upgrade version "condition" was to have an earlier version of windows. And that's why it would check for a CD of a previous version. But this never meant that you would lose the ability of doing clean installs, etc.

Unless the license explicitly says that an upgrade version of vista can only be installed on top of a previous XP installation, then there's absolutely no reason to believe that help article. Because for all sakes, upgrade version or not, you're still buying the SAME product. The only difference is the license terms and the condition for you to be using the upgrade (== cheaper) version instead of the more expensive one.

Heres the deal,

You CAN boot from the vista DVD, the edition you install is decided by the key entered

However if you Boot from the DVD you can only do a CLEAN install, you can't upgrade you existing OS.

If you do not boot from the vista DVD and run the install from within your existing windows installation, you have 2 options, to do a clean install OR upgrade inplace your existing OS install

Heres the deal,

You CAN boot from the vista DVD, the edition you install is decided by the key entered

However if you Boot from the DVD you can only do a CLEAN install, you can't upgrade you existing OS.

If you do not boot from the vista DVD and run the install from within your existing windows installation, you have 2 options, to do a clean install OR upgrade inplace your existing OS install

So you're saying that you can boot from and do a clean install from an upgrade disk? That means that the original poster is completely incorrect (as is the MS help). Others have been saying that you can not do a clean install by booting from an upgrade disk; the only way is by running the install program from a valid windows installation.

However, if it is true that all disks are identical (OEM, upgrade, and retail) and the key is used to differentiate between them, then you have to be able to do a clean install from the upgrade disk, since you can do the install without entering a license key.

I still don't get it.

Have they changed the license again? Buying an upgrade version never meant losing some functionality (in this case, losing the ability of a clean install when you have windows xp).

What I mean is, upgrade version "condition" was to have an earlier version of windows. And that's why it would check for a CD of a previous version. But this never meant that you would lose the ability of doing clean installs, etc.

Unless the license explicitly says that an upgrade version of vista can only be installed on top of a previous XP installation, then there's absolutely no reason to believe that help article. Because for all sakes, upgrade version or not, you're still buying the SAME product. The only difference is the license terms and the condition for you to be using the upgrade (== cheaper) version instead of the more expensive one.

Well, why does the Help file say that, then? It's RTM - shouldn't the Help file be updated too?

Well, why does the Help file say that, then? It's RTM - shouldn't the Help file be updated too?

Shouldn't the LICENSE be updated too? If the upgrade version is crippling some functionality (and I consider a clean install a feature), then it should be stated somewhere, not just in the help.

I'm inclined to think that the help file means that you can only perform an upgrade from within the previous version of windows, and not by booting the disc.

Shouldn't the LICENSE be updated too? If the upgrade version is crippling some functionality (and I consider a clean install a feature), then it should be stated somewhere, not just in the help.

I'm inclined to think that the help file means that you can only perform an upgrade from within the previous version of windows, and not by booting the disc.

Yesthat would be better... not being able to install from boot with an upgrade dvd would be a serious crippling indeed.

So let me get this clear as I am unsure going through all this thread. I have a legitimate copy of xp pro and buy an upgrade copy of vista ultimate. I can only install it through the windows environment and I can do an upgrade or clean (which I plan on) install, but if my hd dies I have to install xp for it to work because of wga?

If that's the case its worth it to save me $200 and <sarcasm>thanks</sarcasm> microsoft for not just having vista starter and vista.

Yesthat would be better... not being able to install from boot with an upgrade dvd would be a serious crippling indeed.

How is it crippling to people who aren't pirates?

Here's how it works.

You have XP installed.

You put in the Vista Upgrade DVD.

It asks if you want to do a clean install or upgrade.

You choose which one you want and it does it's thing.

What's wrong with that?

Whats wrong is that when you have to start fresh (reformat or new HD), you have to install XP and THEN Vista. One of the main features of Vista is that it only takes ~20 minutes to install. The quick install time is worth nothing when you have to do a ~1 hour XP install first. :angry:

Bummer, but that's why you're paying for the cheaper "upgrade" version. Since you intend on upgrading an existing OS to Vista. Otherwise you'd be paying for the full version copy which can boot off the DVD and start fresh, without having to install a previous version.

Sucks, but that's the only way to validate (WGA) your copy of XP/upgrade to Vista.

Sucks, but that's the only way to validate (WGA) your copy of XP/upgrade to Vista.

They couldn't have offered an option to enter your key during installation? I disagree with that statement. It shouldn't be a problem as it could establish internet connectivity and validate once setup starts and has loaded the necessary files.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!