Vista Forceware 97.27 out


Recommended Posts

I did change 1280x1024 to 1440x900 on all 4 .inf files and de Modes file. Still no 1440x900. I tried to change dvi to vga, but no sucess. But something has changed, now apear one more weird resolution available, but no 1440x900. Im i missing something? I downloaded the stock driver from laptop2go. downloaded de inf so can be compatible with my 7800GT, now change those lines on those files, swith cables, damm..... still no 1440x900.

I did tried powerstrip.

May i remember you that 96.33 detect the monitor correctly and 1440x900 is available!!!!!

I also tried delete the Nvidia Direct Access Files at windows\system32 but.... nothing.

Thanks for suport!

@guys compaining about 1440x900:

Did you try what i wrote in the post righ above here?

As mentioned, i had no 1680x1050 (VGA) what so ever in Vista before, but i found the solution for the problem. Don't see any reason why it shouldn't work for 1440x900.

And you could always use Powerstrip to fix it, although i don't like that solution too well.

Why are you talking about VGA? We are talking about DVI. With a VGA cable the resolution works fine. But not with DVI.

Why are you talking about VGA? We are talking about DVI. With a VGA cable the resolution works fine. But not with DVI.

That is incorrect. I'm using a VGA cable and the newest drivers I can use are 96.85 with 1440x900. 97.19 and 97.27 will not allow 1440x900 even with a VGA cable.

I also tried modifying the ini files as a previous poster suggested but I had no luck in doing so.

That is incorrect. I'm using a VGA cable and the newest drivers I can use are 96.85 with 1440x900. 97.19 and 97.27 will not allow 1440x900 even with a VGA cable.

I also tried modifying the ini files as a previous poster suggested but I had no luck in doing so.

same here

first i loose 1440x900, then 1280 x 800 with these drivers :pinch:

have to do 1280 x 1024 and it looks bad

but i got chess titans to run! before i had issues...maybe double agent will work too? :blink:

first post

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!