HD-DVD wins, Blu-Ray loses


Recommended Posts

HD DVD wins, Blu-ray loses

Much like it is with game systems; competing formats for video are not about the best technology. They are about the most prevalent technology. It is expensive to publish movies and, at least for now, you can't put Blu-ray and HD DVD disks into the same box.

With the Xbox 360 moving so strongly into the market and the top accessory this year being the $200 HD-DVD drive the battle may be over by year end. There is every chance that there may be as many as ten times more HD DVD players than Blu-ray players in the market by the end of the year - even if you don't factor in that HP, the current leader in PC sales, started shipping desktop computers with a $100 HD DVD option. This, coupled with a much lower overall cost for the stand alone players as well as better support for legacy TVs and dual mode disks (that have both legacy DVD and HD-DVD content on a single disk), suggests that HD-DVD is now the format to beat.

HD-DVD wins because of the Xbox 360 - which is ironic, given Blu-ray should have won because of the Playstation 3. Instead, Blu-ray has delayed the Playstation 3 to a point where Sony may have to wait until the Playstation 4 to recover.

BetaMax, Mini-Disk, MemoryStick, and now Blu-ray. At least Sony is consistent. Also, if there is one company that is really looking forward to a better 2007 more than Sony I don't know of it. Boy, when you couple in root kits and battery/camera recalls, you are talking about a really nasty run of bad luck for Sony this year.

Source : TGDaily

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/517196-hd-dvd-wins-blu-ray-loses/
Share on other sites

I love how with such a 'decisive' title, the author forgets to mention hybrid discs as one of his arguments.

Aparently, you didn't read the article. He's not talking about hybrid HDDVD+Blu-Ray, he's talking about DVD+HD-DVD discs.

These types of discs are great, buy a hybrid DVD today, and use it on your DVD player now. When your ready to make the jump to HD, your entire collection will be HD by just purchasing an HD-DVD player. Pretty smart, if you ask me.

Agreed, many consumers are still loving DVDs. I don't think many people want to rebuy some of their movies on HD-DVD or buy an expensive standalone player.

and i am one of those people, i still love my dvds, but i do think HD DVD will win, we are already selling them at work (future shop) on hp towers and they are a chea upgrade (like 150 canadian, not even), we don't expect to see any blu ray drives for a long time

Aparently, you didn't read the article. He's not talking about hybrid HDDVD+Blu-Ray, he's talking about DVD+HD-DVD discs.

I did read it. I was talking about hybrid HD-dvd + dvd, but I somehow missed the part where he did mention it :pinch:

That's the clear winner imho. The fact that Toshiba put so much effort into getting hd-dvd on one side and dvd on the other side is enough to win the battle :yes:

You have to see a movie in HD-DVD and DVD to really see the difference and it will jump in your face (agreed, you need to own a HDTV). It's really nice to finaly have a picture with no noise, no artifacts, no compression aberations.

I know it's the same for Blu-Ray movies, but find me a $499 stand-alone player.... Or $200 for Xbox360 owners or at only $100 upgrade inside a PC.

I can't say that HD-DVD is the winner, but on price only, it beats anything else. And at BestBuy, HD-DVD movies cost less than Blu-Ray.... For the same movie.

Way to go Sony, how to kill another format.

I've said it from the beginning, HD-DVD will win vs Blu-Ray because of the name.

People know what HD means, they know what DVD means, putting them together = "ooh, cool, high def DVD!"

Howard Stern was doing a plug on his show for some Sony Vaio computer the other day with a built in BluRay player and half way though it he was like "what the f$*# is BluRay???" -- I laughed so hard I nearly pee'd myself ;)

Mini-Disc was very popular in Asia and the Middle East. (still is being used)

As for memory stick, that's just a proprietary memory format, just as mmc, sd, transflash etc... are

Only used in Sony devices. You wont find Memory Stick in anything else. It's SD or Compac Flash.

I've said it from the beginning, HD-DVD will win vs Blu-Ray because of the name.

People know what HD means, they know what DVD means, putting them together = "ooh, cool, high def DVD!"

Howard Stern was doing a plug on his show for some Sony Vaio computer the other day with a built in BluRay player and half way though it he was like "what the f$*# is BluRay???" -- I laughed so hard I nearly pee'd myself ;)

That's what I'm thinking, people see the name HD-DVD and they immediately know what the product is. Plus its sounds like the next logical step for formats. But don't expect HD movies to take off for atleast another year beause there are some titles that are Blu-ray exclusive.

Although HD-DVD seems slightly inferior on paper, the prospect of HD-DVD/DVD hybrid discs are a massive selling point for me. The market will struggle to be weaned off DVDs as it is, and interoperability will certainly help with this.

Today I got some promotional stuff from Comet (an electrical retailer), and on the back was an HD-DVD player for ?499 and a blu-ray player for ?999:pinch:h:

For me, I can't fathom why blu-ray is so much more expensive. I know the 2 formats are based on essentially the same technology, but is it because DVD manufacturing plants can be modified to produce HD-DVDs whereas blu-ray means investing in new capital and fabrication plants? Someone please educate m:):)

These types of discs are great, buy a hybrid DVD today, and use it on your DVD player now. When your ready to make the jump to HD, your entire collection will be HD by just purchasing an HD-DVD player. Pretty smart, if you ask me.

That's the best reason to choose HD-DVD over Blu-Ray. That is unless DVD/Blu-Ray hybrid discs pop up, if that's feasible.

Now, if only Microsoft were to release an updated 360 with a built in HD-DVD drive once the cost drops to an additional $100 or so, and release games on the hybrid HD-DVD/DVD format. The HD-DVD layer would contain higher quality textures, sound and FMV, and the DVD layer would allow owners of the first generation 360 to still play the latest games.

One can dream. :cry:

Agreed, many consumers are still loving DVDs. I don't think many people want to rebuy some of their movies on HD-DVD or buy an expensive standalone player.

true enough but if i HAD to get a player, i think a $200 hd-dvd is more on my mind then a $1000 blu-ray

This article is another example of analysts and haters of Sony "blowing their load" way too fast. The PS3 hasn't even been out for 2 weeks and people are already writing it off. So so foolish.

This article doesn't take into account the tens of millions of PS3s that will sell in the coming years. For each PS3 that sells, there's another Blu-Ray player sold. The same cannot be said for the 360; one needs to buy a separate accessory to play high definition movies. I would hate to be the one who has to make more room in the entertainment center when it could have been built-in.

Who knows, maybe HD-DVD and Blu-Ray will both fizzle out, not take flight, and some new, kick-ass format is born that sweeps the market.

Bottom line: Don't write off Sony and Blu-Ray just yet. It's very foolish.

There's a reason MS had that $100 sale on Amazon for their core system. They're desperate to sell systems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!