Vista slow at copying files


Recommended Posts

That worked for me, I am on RC2, what is remote differetial compression anyway?

More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

That's ReadyDrive not SuperFetch... everyone benefits from SuperFetch since all it does is load your typical apps into unused memory.

SuperFetch has plenty of problems though, real ones that I've identified by monitoring tools. (this is on RTM, of course)

For me SuperFetch (yes, it was that one; I checked the SvcHost's service list and disabled one by one) totally ruined my performance as I used eMule, and I can imagine other apps being affected too. Vista simply thought "OK, so it's evening and he probably wish to run eMule" and started prefetching -- get this -- an unfinished download of several hundred MB's. It just kept reading, reading, making the drive go wild, so I checked what was going on in the Sysinternals File Monitor and I had a lot of read for one and the same file over and over. As soon as I stoppsed the SuperFetch service, my hard drive went completely silent and my computer became far more responsive as it tried to load applications I started and ran.

I wish SuperFetch would be much more configurable and not a black box sitting doing "something it feels would be right" to improve performance. I don't really want to generalize, but it's such typical Microsoft behavior to hide important customization like this from the user in order to dumb it down enough for the masses. File and directory exclusion filters would work wonders with it. Or at least only prefetch executables and DLL's! There's absolutely no reason I'd like to prefetch an unfinished download for faster access because I'm of course not going to run it.

Keep in mind that SuperFetch is based a whole lot on guesswork and statistics.

Edited by Jugalator
More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

Thanks for the explain and link, I would rather choose faster file copying I think.

in synthetic benchmarks or something of the kind? cause last time i tried the retail version of Vista it was pretty slow :| might've been placebo. but damn it sure took long. either it really is slow or microsoft's research into making the user think that a process is going faster was totally bogus :p

& how did thoust get the Retail version?

Well too add my 2pence worth;

Copying to (XP) compressed Usb drive is fast, from it is slow, same drive to same drive is slow, moving files on desktop very slow, a lot of drive clashes on a 512Mb machine. Disabling this and that has little effect if any - wish I could find the magic switch and get some stability back into hd performance.

Some noticeable things I have found (and not so)

Changing the swap drive to another as in XP does not seem as effective in Vista

Moving the temp drive does make a diff (away from system drive) (user profile, my enviro variables)

Readyboost on a 512Mb Laptop (forced) worth it but give it time, same with superfetch over time it should improve things (or so MS say)

Drop the Aero interface - gives 20Mb back to system and is faster for sure.

Dissabling non used services less effective than in XP as a lot show that they are not running and take nothing from memory, the default is quite well behaved I think.

P2P programs should be away from system drive and temp/swap drives, better to have 4 drives (not partitions it still has to seek) 1 System, 1 Swap, 1 Temp, 1 P2P even better if you can add to that 1 Programs, 1 Data - would help performance defiantly.

Of course more memory the better.

Annoyances;

answers on a postcard please!

Task Bar - if you add a new toolbar it is locked to the taskbar, you don't seem to be able to move it onto the screen and use as a program launcher as in XP (yes taskbar is unlocked)

Calculating time dialog can take longer than operation Doh!

Sometime files get forgotten on a move.

'You need permission' for what, moving a data file of my own Why! - even as administrator

Slow run command !

Program compatibility - what does the compatibility service do !

...

I'm having the same problems running on Vista RC1.

None of the solutions posted in this thread have helped.

Trying to copy files accross a network on a gigabit connection. Speeds are dreadful. Maxing out at 3MB/sec.

Any solutions to this problem?

Edited by Stivort

I've tried everything suggested in this thread. Nothing so far has helped with transfering of files within Vista. Even files on the same hard drive take forever. My USB 2.0 travel drive takes forever. Zip files take forever. What's going on? Also. Windows Explorer seems to hang and eat up resources like no tomorrow when I do these things.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

3.0Ghz

2.00gb Ram

SATA 250GB WD hard drive 7200rpm

NVidia GeForce 7900GS 256mb

Thanks in advance!

Jon

Try to do hard drive defragmantion...and good luck with that...It takes hour to complete. And you can't even see the pogress...total CRAP!

Vista needs service pack..badlyyy

Defrag sucks. No time or % given. Why would windows go to sleep when you have defrag going? I do not mind it going to sleep but it should go to sleep after it finishes.

It was a false alarm but.... I've changed my network card to the one integrated with my MB (nForce2 chipset) and... it is working!!!

Previously I had the '3Com EtherLink 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C905B-TX)' installed. I haven't got drivers for Vista (drivers for this 3com card aren't provided with Vista) and I used drivers for XP :|

It looks like that this solved my problem.

UPDATE: I think that those (3com) drivers were updated by Windows Update and nothing's changed. Everything is working properly on nForce-based card.

Regards

No1B

Edited by No1B

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

This seemed to work for me . Give it a try. 10 times better performance.

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Don't know what's going on...

I just copied a previous WinVista Users/Public folder and subfolders to my login and it took about 3 minutes to transfer 12 GB of data.

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

Works for me Too

Running Vista business +10

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KillerPDF 1.4.2 by Razvan Serea KillerPDF is a lightweight, portable PDF editor for Windows built for users who want full control without subscriptions, installers, or telemetry. It runs as a single executable, making it ideal for USB use and field work. You can view PDFs with smooth PDFium rendering, navigate quickly with thumbnails, zoom, and shortcuts, and reorganize pages using drag-and-drop. It supports merging multiple PDFs, splitting documents, and extracting selected pages. KillerPDF also allows inline text editing with font matching to preserve the original layout, plus annotations like text boxes, freehand drawing, highlights, and reusable signatures. You can search full text, copy content easily, and print documents with flattened annotations. Designed as a free and open alternative to bloated PDF tools, it works fully offline on Windows 10/11 x64. No runtimes install. Everything needed is inside the EXE (targets .NET Framework 4.8, which ships with every supported Windows release). KillerPDF key features: High-quality PDF rendering via PDFium Edit PDF text inline (double-click to modify text) Page thumbnails and fast navigation with zoom and shortcuts Merge multiple PDFs into one Split PDFs and extract selected pages Drag-and-drop page reordering Font matching to preserve original document appearance Text boxes for notes Freehand drawing tools Highlight overlays with adjustable color, size, opacity Undo actions and clear per-page annotations Create, draw, and save reusable signatures Click-to-place signatures anywhere Full-text search with highlighted results Drag-select or Ctrl+A to copy text Print with annotations flattened Portable single-file app (~10 MB) No installer, no admin rights required No account, no telemetry KillerPDF 1.4.2 changelog: What's new PDF form filling. Interactive PDF forms now render their fields (text inputs, checkboxes, radio buttons) as live controls. Fill them in directly and save — field values are written back into the PDF. PDF outline (bookmark) navigation. A new OUTLINES tab in the sidebar displays the document's bookmark tree. Click any entry to jump to that page. The sidebar auto-fits its width to the longest entry on open and can be dragged wider; switching back to PAGES snaps to the pages-mode width. Fixed Page rotation no longer reverts after saving. Rotations applied via the sidebar context menu now persist correctly through the save pipeline. Copied text words were out of order on PDFs where glyphs are stored in non-reading order (Issue #66). Text extraction now sorts words by position and uses a dynamic line-grouping threshold so both drag-select and Select All produce correctly ordered output. PDFs with malformed or non-standard XRef tables now open in read-only mode instead of showing "Invalid entry in XRef table" and failing entirely. Download: KillerPDF 1.4.2 | 6.1 MB (Open Source) Link: KillerPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!