Vista slow at copying files


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

For people with slow transfers over a network, I have found the following useful:

  • Ensure that Media Center and/or Windows Media Player are CLOSED on both machines.
  • Make sure Flow Control is enabled on your network adapter. Right click on the relevant network connection (e.g., Local Area Network) and select Properties. Click Properties next to the name of the adapter, then find Flow Control in the list, and ensure it's set to ON.

When both of the above are true, my network transfer speeds approach 99% of capacity on a gigabit LAN. When Media Center or WMP is open, the speed seems limited to ~12%. When Flow Control is disabled, max speed are ~45%. No idea why WMP/Media Center seem to limit bandwidth so much, but it worked for me, and hopefully it helps someone else.

o god, i'm glad i'm not the only one w/ this problem....here's what i posed in another forum

ok, so here's the deal with whats going on, which i don't understand.

On my vista machine i have two mapped drives that connect to my server (windows 2003).

Now, I tried two things and figured out what the deal was:

1. I setup a FTP server on the Server machine and shared one drive on the ftp server. I then ran a FTP client on my vista machine and transfered a file from the server to my vista machine and got 60MB/sec!

2. I then set up a share on my Vista machine, logged into my server and transfered a file from my Server to the shared Vista folder and got 60MB/sec.

3. Back on my vista machine, I tried transferring a file from the mapped network drive (which is the same drive as my above 2 tests) to my Vista machine hard drive and got only 20MB/sec. Also, instead of going thru the mapped drives, i went thru the network browser (which essentially is the same thing i guess) and still got only 20MB/sec.

I have auto tuning off, firewall service turned off, and no anti-virus software running...also sending a file from my vista machine to the server thru the mapped drive results in 60MB/sec transfer...its only when im transfering FROM the server to the vista machine from the mapped drive or network browser that i get 20MB/sec.

so basically, FTPing into the server and transferring a file to my vista machine resulted in a fast 60MB/sec transfer....as well as sharing a folder in vista and accessing that share thru the server and transferring a file to the vista machine thru that share on the server machine resulted in a fast 60MB/sec transfer...

the problem lies when using Vista's explorer (mapped drives or not) to transfer a file from the server to the vista machine...which only results in 20MB/sec.

So something is up with how vista is mapping the network drives and something with vista is causing it to transfer slow when going from the mapped drive to the vista machine.

Any ideas?

this needs a fix!!!!!!!!

Wha...? You mean pre-caching applications into RAM to dramatically reduce start times give no benefit?

Not for me...with Raid 0 (WD Raptor 10000RPM) superfetch is totally useless...because my load time without it is just damn fast...you can't tell difference with or without superfetch...

As hard drive gets faster and faster superfetch is going to be more and more useless...

Also, the whole idea about new I-O in Windows Vista is not right. They were supposed to fix the situations happenning with XP where if you lose network connection...a system finds a way out. With Vista is even worse.

Not for me...with Raid 0 (WD Raptor 10000RPM) superfetch is totally useless...because my load time without it is just damn fast...you can't tell difference with or without superfetch...

As hard drive gets faster and faster superfetch is going to be more and more useless...

Also, the whole idea about new I-O in Windows Vista is not right. They were supposed to fix the situations happenning with XP where if you lose network connection...a system finds a way out. With Vista is even worse.

Even with a RAID-0 array with 10k Raptors, the seek time on your hard drives should be many many many many times longer than the seek time from your RAM.

Vista isn't ready. SP1 may fix some of the problems but I doubt it.

:rolleyes: How many times are you going to spout this crap? It's completely untrue and every time you say it you look that much more ignorant.

You can also check the sytem board manufacturer's website for a newer bios update if available. Also, I remember reading a while ago that certian VIA southbridge chipsets caused issues with slow/corrupt data transfer -- try the VIA 4-in-1 update pack. For intel, I downloaded the latest INF utility and noticed updated drivers upon reboot. Let me know if you see better results.

::winXpert::

I darn sure do. I loaded the new VIA drivers and vroom vroom vroom, I love Veesta once again. Everything is faster, not just file transfers. Rock on buddy! :woot:

You can also check the sytem board manufacturer's website for a newer bios update if available. Also, I remember reading a while ago that certian VIA southbridge chipsets caused issues with slow/corrupt data transfer -- try the VIA 4-in-1 update pack. For intel, I downloaded the latest INF utility and noticed updated drivers upon reboot. Let me know if you see better results.

::winXpert::

Thanks for this tip... I never thought about updating the chipset drivers from Intel. This resulted in improved speeds with Longhorn server Beta 3... and I'm sure the same will apply to Vista. I think I just may have solved my biggest problem with vista.. slow transfers between disk partitions. I'll have to try a few more things though before I can conclusively say its fixed.

If anyone else has an Intel board, I definitely recommend getting their updated Vista chipset drivers.

Is it safe to installed the Intel chipset drivers on a well used Vista install with all the current drivers and apps I already have installed?

Also, would it be an idea to reinstall all the other hardware drivers once the chipset driver is installed?

I thought it was best to install the INF chipset drivers before any other drivers - but I ain't gonna do ANOTHER reformat & install of Vista - that would make it my 4th install with this slow buggy piece of crap OS (which unfortunately I like very much... I'm just an eye candy ######, and on top of that DVD Maker / Media Center are very useful for me)

It gives you a Icon with a picture or a picture of the video instead to the normal icon its in the folder option under the view tab just uncheck "Always show icons, never thumbnails" like i said it solved my issue. hope it helps because the other fixes didnt help me.

  • 1 year later...
Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

I did this and it took only a seconds in copying a file in a flash drive before it was more than a minute

The file copying is slow because you have low memory, 512MB is the min to run vista but it will be VERY slow, upgrade the ram to 2GB and then file transfers will be fast as vista won't need to use the slow HDD.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!