Vista slow at copying files


Recommended Posts

That worked for me, I am on RC2, what is remote differetial compression anyway?

More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

That's ReadyDrive not SuperFetch... everyone benefits from SuperFetch since all it does is load your typical apps into unused memory.

SuperFetch has plenty of problems though, real ones that I've identified by monitoring tools. (this is on RTM, of course)

For me SuperFetch (yes, it was that one; I checked the SvcHost's service list and disabled one by one) totally ruined my performance as I used eMule, and I can imagine other apps being affected too. Vista simply thought "OK, so it's evening and he probably wish to run eMule" and started prefetching -- get this -- an unfinished download of several hundred MB's. It just kept reading, reading, making the drive go wild, so I checked what was going on in the Sysinternals File Monitor and I had a lot of read for one and the same file over and over. As soon as I stoppsed the SuperFetch service, my hard drive went completely silent and my computer became far more responsive as it tried to load applications I started and ran.

I wish SuperFetch would be much more configurable and not a black box sitting doing "something it feels would be right" to improve performance. I don't really want to generalize, but it's such typical Microsoft behavior to hide important customization like this from the user in order to dumb it down enough for the masses. File and directory exclusion filters would work wonders with it. Or at least only prefetch executables and DLL's! There's absolutely no reason I'd like to prefetch an unfinished download for faster access because I'm of course not going to run it.

Keep in mind that SuperFetch is based a whole lot on guesswork and statistics.

Edited by Jugalator
More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

Thanks for the explain and link, I would rather choose faster file copying I think.

in synthetic benchmarks or something of the kind? cause last time i tried the retail version of Vista it was pretty slow :| might've been placebo. but damn it sure took long. either it really is slow or microsoft's research into making the user think that a process is going faster was totally bogus :p

& how did thoust get the Retail version?

Well too add my 2pence worth;

Copying to (XP) compressed Usb drive is fast, from it is slow, same drive to same drive is slow, moving files on desktop very slow, a lot of drive clashes on a 512Mb machine. Disabling this and that has little effect if any - wish I could find the magic switch and get some stability back into hd performance.

Some noticeable things I have found (and not so)

Changing the swap drive to another as in XP does not seem as effective in Vista

Moving the temp drive does make a diff (away from system drive) (user profile, my enviro variables)

Readyboost on a 512Mb Laptop (forced) worth it but give it time, same with superfetch over time it should improve things (or so MS say)

Drop the Aero interface - gives 20Mb back to system and is faster for sure.

Dissabling non used services less effective than in XP as a lot show that they are not running and take nothing from memory, the default is quite well behaved I think.

P2P programs should be away from system drive and temp/swap drives, better to have 4 drives (not partitions it still has to seek) 1 System, 1 Swap, 1 Temp, 1 P2P even better if you can add to that 1 Programs, 1 Data - would help performance defiantly.

Of course more memory the better.

Annoyances;

answers on a postcard please!

Task Bar - if you add a new toolbar it is locked to the taskbar, you don't seem to be able to move it onto the screen and use as a program launcher as in XP (yes taskbar is unlocked)

Calculating time dialog can take longer than operation Doh!

Sometime files get forgotten on a move.

'You need permission' for what, moving a data file of my own Why! - even as administrator

Slow run command !

Program compatibility - what does the compatibility service do !

...

I'm having the same problems running on Vista RC1.

None of the solutions posted in this thread have helped.

Trying to copy files accross a network on a gigabit connection. Speeds are dreadful. Maxing out at 3MB/sec.

Any solutions to this problem?

Edited by Stivort

I've tried everything suggested in this thread. Nothing so far has helped with transfering of files within Vista. Even files on the same hard drive take forever. My USB 2.0 travel drive takes forever. Zip files take forever. What's going on? Also. Windows Explorer seems to hang and eat up resources like no tomorrow when I do these things.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

3.0Ghz

2.00gb Ram

SATA 250GB WD hard drive 7200rpm

NVidia GeForce 7900GS 256mb

Thanks in advance!

Jon

Try to do hard drive defragmantion...and good luck with that...It takes hour to complete. And you can't even see the pogress...total CRAP!

Vista needs service pack..badlyyy

Defrag sucks. No time or % given. Why would windows go to sleep when you have defrag going? I do not mind it going to sleep but it should go to sleep after it finishes.

It was a false alarm but.... I've changed my network card to the one integrated with my MB (nForce2 chipset) and... it is working!!!

Previously I had the '3Com EtherLink 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C905B-TX)' installed. I haven't got drivers for Vista (drivers for this 3com card aren't provided with Vista) and I used drivers for XP :|

It looks like that this solved my problem.

UPDATE: I think that those (3com) drivers were updated by Windows Update and nothing's changed. Everything is working properly on nForce-based card.

Regards

No1B

Edited by No1B

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

This seemed to work for me . Give it a try. 10 times better performance.

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Don't know what's going on...

I just copied a previous WinVista Users/Public folder and subfolders to my login and it took about 3 minutes to transfer 12 GB of data.

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

Works for me Too

Running Vista business +10

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!