Vista slow at copying files


Recommended Posts

That worked for me, I am on RC2, what is remote differetial compression anyway?

More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

That's ReadyDrive not SuperFetch... everyone benefits from SuperFetch since all it does is load your typical apps into unused memory.

SuperFetch has plenty of problems though, real ones that I've identified by monitoring tools. (this is on RTM, of course)

For me SuperFetch (yes, it was that one; I checked the SvcHost's service list and disabled one by one) totally ruined my performance as I used eMule, and I can imagine other apps being affected too. Vista simply thought "OK, so it's evening and he probably wish to run eMule" and started prefetching -- get this -- an unfinished download of several hundred MB's. It just kept reading, reading, making the drive go wild, so I checked what was going on in the Sysinternals File Monitor and I had a lot of read for one and the same file over and over. As soon as I stoppsed the SuperFetch service, my hard drive went completely silent and my computer became far more responsive as it tried to load applications I started and ran.

I wish SuperFetch would be much more configurable and not a black box sitting doing "something it feels would be right" to improve performance. I don't really want to generalize, but it's such typical Microsoft behavior to hide important customization like this from the user in order to dumb it down enough for the masses. File and directory exclusion filters would work wonders with it. Or at least only prefetch executables and DLL's! There's absolutely no reason I'd like to prefetch an unfinished download for faster access because I'm of course not going to run it.

Keep in mind that SuperFetch is based a whole lot on guesswork and statistics.

Edited by Jugalator
More on Remote Differential Compression. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372948.aspx

I just breezed over the article, but I think it bascially compares files on the fly so if you are copying a file from one computer to another and a copy exists on both machines, it will then only transfer over the changes rather than the entire file. Thus saving network bandwidth by only transfering the small changes. I can see how could have an impact on transfer speed because i would assume that the comparison proccess adds to the overhead. So while it's may be transfering less, the time may take longer because it has to first compare the files for changes.

Thanks for the explain and link, I would rather choose faster file copying I think.

in synthetic benchmarks or something of the kind? cause last time i tried the retail version of Vista it was pretty slow :| might've been placebo. but damn it sure took long. either it really is slow or microsoft's research into making the user think that a process is going faster was totally bogus :p

& how did thoust get the Retail version?

Well too add my 2pence worth;

Copying to (XP) compressed Usb drive is fast, from it is slow, same drive to same drive is slow, moving files on desktop very slow, a lot of drive clashes on a 512Mb machine. Disabling this and that has little effect if any - wish I could find the magic switch and get some stability back into hd performance.

Some noticeable things I have found (and not so)

Changing the swap drive to another as in XP does not seem as effective in Vista

Moving the temp drive does make a diff (away from system drive) (user profile, my enviro variables)

Readyboost on a 512Mb Laptop (forced) worth it but give it time, same with superfetch over time it should improve things (or so MS say)

Drop the Aero interface - gives 20Mb back to system and is faster for sure.

Dissabling non used services less effective than in XP as a lot show that they are not running and take nothing from memory, the default is quite well behaved I think.

P2P programs should be away from system drive and temp/swap drives, better to have 4 drives (not partitions it still has to seek) 1 System, 1 Swap, 1 Temp, 1 P2P even better if you can add to that 1 Programs, 1 Data - would help performance defiantly.

Of course more memory the better.

Annoyances;

answers on a postcard please!

Task Bar - if you add a new toolbar it is locked to the taskbar, you don't seem to be able to move it onto the screen and use as a program launcher as in XP (yes taskbar is unlocked)

Calculating time dialog can take longer than operation Doh!

Sometime files get forgotten on a move.

'You need permission' for what, moving a data file of my own Why! - even as administrator

Slow run command !

Program compatibility - what does the compatibility service do !

...

I'm having the same problems running on Vista RC1.

None of the solutions posted in this thread have helped.

Trying to copy files accross a network on a gigabit connection. Speeds are dreadful. Maxing out at 3MB/sec.

Any solutions to this problem?

Edited by Stivort

I've tried everything suggested in this thread. Nothing so far has helped with transfering of files within Vista. Even files on the same hard drive take forever. My USB 2.0 travel drive takes forever. Zip files take forever. What's going on? Also. Windows Explorer seems to hang and eat up resources like no tomorrow when I do these things.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

3.0Ghz

2.00gb Ram

SATA 250GB WD hard drive 7200rpm

NVidia GeForce 7900GS 256mb

Thanks in advance!

Jon

Try to do hard drive defragmantion...and good luck with that...It takes hour to complete. And you can't even see the pogress...total CRAP!

Vista needs service pack..badlyyy

Defrag sucks. No time or % given. Why would windows go to sleep when you have defrag going? I do not mind it going to sleep but it should go to sleep after it finishes.

It was a false alarm but.... I've changed my network card to the one integrated with my MB (nForce2 chipset) and... it is working!!!

Previously I had the '3Com EtherLink 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C905B-TX)' installed. I haven't got drivers for Vista (drivers for this 3com card aren't provided with Vista) and I used drivers for XP :|

It looks like that this solved my problem.

UPDATE: I think that those (3com) drivers were updated by Windows Update and nothing's changed. Everything is working properly on nForce-based card.

Regards

No1B

Edited by No1B

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

This seemed to work for me . Give it a try. 10 times better performance.

Slow at copying files, try the service pack 1 update to Visual Studio !

Its just taken 5 hours on Vista to complete (wow must be a record), XP 2 Hours #!#!

Thats was with NOD32 running - some over head but XP was using far slower AVG Free

Try moving 1-0 shortcuts from the desktop to a folder - takes longer to draw the dialog to infor calculating time than to do the opperation - what is with that then ??

Don't know what's going on...

I just copied a previous WinVista Users/Public folder and subfolders to my login and it took about 3 minutes to transfer 12 GB of data.

Hey guys and gals,

I "Think" I solved the answer to the slow copying. I came across this while trying to uninstall the MS SQL sync program. This may work for you I have noticed a HUGE increase on the web and on my network with this. I use Ultimate btw.

Start >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features

Click on " Turn windows features on or off" on the left side of the panel

Takes a sec to load all the features

Uncheck "Remote Differential Compression"

I also unchecked "Print Services" (Since I don't have a printer)

Click "Ok" and you will be all set.

I then copied a 700 movie from one drive to another and it took less then 10 secs.

-+>Aaron

Let me know if it works for you.

Works for me Too

Running Vista business +10

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!