Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

As of 9a559 A2DP was working, but it isn't listed in the 300 features. It was buggy however... so maybe it got removed. :cry:

Anyone know if we can use our original restore cds to install ilife? I just got the new imac and of course I had to have it before leopard but I don't wanna have to rebuy something I already feel I paid for.

Either from the Optional Installs on Disc 2 or through Pacifist. :)

Khoi Vinh on Leopard's packaging:

Apple?s designers have borrowed the boldly elegant ?X? from the packaging of its predecessor, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, and placed it against the goofy, sci-fi-fueled, airbrushed nebula of stars from Leopard?s Time Machine feature. Why they did this, it?s not clear, because it looks horrific. Apparently, Leopard?s most lucrative potential customer base may all be devotees of the plasticky, bombastic and yet still naIve era of science fiction we call the Nineteen Eighties.

^yea right....

well i for myself think the packaging looks good... but if that khoi vinh guy doesnt i guess i have to change my mind... =)

im wondering why do people actually **** up about the packaging or even think about it. tbh i didnt even pay attention on it yet... i mean yea i know its that X and that nebula and some stars in reference to time machine, yea, okay, cool but ... yea lets go on, not too important. why do people write blog-entrys about something that unimportant?

i mean yea, of course it should look good and all but who cares if they didnt really get it this time?

tear the packaging off, insert the cd/dvd and install the OS, you will never ever care about the packaging..., most of the time, at least. i still have the great packaging of my ipod mini but yea... its just the packaging!

but thats just me.

A whole bunch of people who purchase stuff from Apple get very particular about the packaging. The look and the "experience" when opening it. Example, there was a thread at Macrumors before the iPhone launch where people were worried that AT&T employees would open the iPhone packaging in the store to activate the iPhone they just purchased. In other words, they wouldn't get the "experience" of opening the package.

I will admit Apple packaging is the best I've seen, but in the end it doesn't matter. Just open the damn thing and play with the toy inside.

the packaging makes the first impression, and Apple is pushing leopard as a futuristic OS... hence the space theme. I think the package looks great, as well as the new default wallpaper (I never changed my Aqua wallpaper in years of owning Macs for more than a day or a few hours.) I would like to see the time machine wall included without me having to dig it out of system resources though.

But really, if you dont like it... put it in your closet and don't display it on your desk like a museum piece.

of course packaging is important and gives you the first impression and i love to pack things out too, packing out my macbook was an amazing experience but then again i may have only noticed it because it WAS great. if it wasnt i bet i wouldve never said "man, that packaging was bad."

Great article that I suggest people take more than a glance at.

http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives...me_home_le.html

Apple OS X Leopard: A beautiful upgrade

Finally, a PC Unix that everyone can love. OS X Leopard is a triumph of customer-focused engineering

Apple, OS X, LeopardApple's announcement of the impending delivery of OS X Leopard (release 10.5 of Mac and Xserve operating systems) marks the public debut of an engineering achievement that dwarfs iPhone, iPod, Windows, and Linux. No other PC server vendor, with the notable exception of Sun Microsystems, invests so much time and manpower in its system software.

In 10 days -- 10 excruciating days -- I and hundreds of Mac developers and VIP users can finally speak out about that which we have sworn to hold secret. Leopard is magnificent code architected from the user in, rather than from core technology out.

Windows and Linux are designed from the core out, which is to say that they are all about layered kernels, system calls, and APIs, with each layer's purpose being to abstract the layers below it. The layers grow thicker; when a layer gets unmanageably thick, a pretty new abstraction layer is created so that people don't have to deal with the ugly one. Programmers end up having endless entry points with identical purpose and having heated debates about which ones are best. But each way of doing the same thing involves varying dependencies, deprecations, and peculiarities.

Everyone plugs into OS X through the frameworks, and below that lies a stable, thin, simple, and well-documented system stack. It is not the frameworks' job to abstract lower levels of software. From a developer's point of view, the frameworks are OS X. When developers write to Apple's frameworks, they inherit cross-application integration and operational and interface consistency with no effort. For example, E-Mail, the Address Book, and QuickTime are smart, autonomous objects available to all Mac apps regardless of language and requiring no optional software. You look in the docs to find the object you need, you shoot a message at it (you can always count on framework objects being present and behaving as documented), and receive a response that you can use directly without marshaling. The whole system is about message passing among objects.

The system's hardware configuration and management are exposed as objects. If you want to know the battery's charge level or get a list of wireless networks within range, OS X has common frameworks to do it. Sometimes hacks are necessary, and when they are, they take the tidy form of superclasses of existing objects or new objects inserted into a chain of message responders. The whole thing is easy to grok, and the tools and docs are free.

Leopard is beautiful, not merely in appearance but in design, all the way down to its certified Unix core. My own core is Unix certified, and now that Apple has reworked OS X to jump the many hurdles required to bear the Unix trademark, I feel like I've returned from a lengthy self-imposed exile. Finally, there's a PC Unix that everyone can love.

I offer these raves as one who is intimately familiar with all popular microcomputer operating systems. Each OS, including prior versions of OS X, have left me wanting and looking ahead to future releases. I irritate the hell out of Apple's PR and product managers by interrupting their scripted briefings and meetings with questions that force them to say, "We're looking at that for the next release."

For example, when Apple showed the Spotlight integrated search facility at Tiger's (OS X 10.4) launch, I stole the glint from the eyes of Apple's beaming executives and asked, "What about searching across the network?" They said that they were looking at that for the next release, and they silently wondered why I showed up at a christening asking when that kid would get a job.

I remember standing in a room full of proud engineers, each of them three feet smarter than I am, telling them that a rack server without lights-out management, hardware RAID, and redundant power supplies can't accumulate enterprise cred. It seemed to Apple that OS X flat never fails to boot, which was a prerequisite for diagnosing and managing a hobbled Xserve. Apple has filled in all of those gaps, and it is constantly at that job.

I know it's difficult for people who don't use Macs to understand why an operating system gets us so worked up. The coming debut of Leopard may make you mindful of Vista, an OS that no one begged to get before it shipped and that very few rushed out to get after it shipped. Vista's penetration is largely incidental, a result of being preinstalled on new PCs. That is not how Leopard will score its wins. Apple's customers rush to upgrade, and not because some sticker on a box of software says "designed for Leopard."

Leopard is a legitimately big deal. It's underhyped compared to iPhone, and yet unlike iPhone, Leopard is a genuine triumph of customer-focused engineering. It's a pleasure and a relief to see that Apple remembers how to deliver open, affordable, standards-based products. There probably won't be lines around the block at Apple retail stores for people who can't wait to get their hands on Leopard. If they had been using Leopard as long as developers have, Apple wouldn't be able to stamp Leopard DVDs fast enough. Word will get out.

So i might have it by Friday?

Wait until Wednesday and then see what your order status says. Is it that much of a problem if you don't get it till early next week?

Im gunna be at school so i will have to go 50 miles to the nearest UPS office to get it :@

Won't anyone be at home while your in school? In the UK Apple don't normally ship via UPS. Its normally TNT.

Won't anyone be at home while your in school? In the UK Apple don't normally ship via UPS. Its normally TNT.

o ive never seen a TNT van where i live :(

Na my mums a nurse and my dad lives miles away lol.

Can anyone confirm which courier apple uses in the UK?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!