Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

Yep, my iMac is one of those that locks up when anything is graphics hungry...

In bootcamp its the worst, I cant even play vista's chess for 5 in without it locking up. What happens is the screen goes black and then I hear the device removal sound vista makes and then the computer locks up. So it as if the graphics are overheating or some crap.

And now after that new patch, frontrow is locking up on me constantly, only way to get out of it is powering off the computer. I swear this iMac is my 4th one of these thin imacs, and it has been the biggest pain in the ass.

Yep, my iMac is one of those that locks up when anything is graphics hungry...

In bootcamp its the worst, I cant even play vista's chess for 5 in without it locking up. What happens is the screen goes black and then I hear the device removal sound vista makes and then the computer locks up. So it as if the graphics are overheating or some crap.

And now after that new patch, frontrow is locking up on me constantly, only way to get out of it is powering off the computer. I swear this iMac is my 4th one of these thin imacs, and it has been the biggest pain in the ass.

I'd definitely demand my money back in that case.

Released via Software Update are new versions of iTunes (7.5) & Quicktime (7.3). Updates are as follows:

iTunes 7.5 - 41.3MB

iTunes 7.5 features the ability to activate iPhone wherever service is offered and support for Phase, a new interactive music game designed exclusively for iPod nano (third generation), iPod classic, and iPod (fifth generation). This release also includes bug fixes to improve stability and performance.

Quicktime 7.3 - 51.8MB

QuickTime 7.3 addresses critical security issues and delivers:

- Support for iTunes 7.5

- Updated support for creating iPhone-compatible web content

- Updated JavaScript support in the QuickTime Web Plug-in

- Numerous bug fixes

This release is recommended for all QuickTime 7 users.

Bild4.png

Bild5.png

Bild2.png

Bild3.png

Bild1.png

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=382098

Edited by giga

Two required changes for iTunes

Fix the scrollbar, either make it standard for OS X.5 or change it to the aqua one.

Use the OS UI Resources instead of it's own to lower memory usage and increase performance.

It's a real shame that one of Apples strongest points has become one of it's biggest complaints in Leopard :(

Still, nice update

Great. Did you actually noticed a difference in performance? It doesn't seem to affect speed on my Mac.

Finder is noticeably faster when I access folders with a lot of images or pdfs now. So it does work. It would crash on some folders on occasion. This is bacsically the Buckley's remedy for Leopard - it doesn't look as good - but it works. ;)

Hey thanks so much for the icons. I am just trying to figure out how to use the ToolbarDownloadsFolderIcon.icns file. I was able to use the other one by converting it to an rsrc file and doing the classic get info and copy to change the icon. But, I don't know how to fix the toolbar icon. I am in system/library/coreservices/core types.bundle/contents/resources/ but I am stuck there. please help.

Didn't know that the entire software update process and look was changed in Leopard...I like the Tiger one better.

i agree that it was nicer in Tiger, but this one is a lot better because it shuts down all the apps in the background reassuring that the update is installed without any interference.

Didn't know that the entire software update process and look was changed in Leopard...I like the Tiger one better.

It didn't change that much... :huh: You still select the updates you want and download and install them. Only the process of installing changed for things that require a reboot, and it's a much better way to do it too.

It didn't change that much... :huh: You still select the updates you want and download and install them. Only the process of installing changed for things that require a reboot, and it's a much better way to do it too.

Can you elaborate on this? I haven't heard about software update changes. What does it do that is different from Tiger when an update requires a reboot?

Can you elaborate on this? I haven't heard about software update changes. What does it do that is different from Tiger when an update requires a reboot?

Updates that require a reboot now shut down all apps and logs you out of your account, then the actual install process begins, then the reboot. Its also gives you the option after downloading to restart right away or later on. If you do a manual restart, OSX will ask you if you want to install the updates you have downloaded or leave them for a later time. It is a bit like Windows tbh.

Except when you say later on Mac, it doesn't nag you every 2 minutes asking, let alone give it a countdown to an automatic restart and installation.

The update process looks more like installing separate packages rather than being integrated all within software update. Makes it seem a little more generic like its just downloading the file and running the installer, rather than doing it all within itself.

Updates that require a reboot now shut down all apps and logs you out of your account, then the actual install process begins, then the reboot. Its also gives you the option after downloading to restart right away or later on. If you do a manual restart, OSX will ask you if you want to install the updates you have downloaded or leave them for a later time. It is a bit like Windows tbh.

The thing is though, this is the safest way of updating. No more people running apps when prebinding happens causing critical system files to be deleted.

The update reminds me of windows....sort of.

i got the same feeling. It's because when you shut down or restart a windows computer (especially vista) while it's downloading or installing options, you have the option to let them continue to do the updates then do the shutdown and restart while the computer is shutting down. You won't see windows anymore, just some dialog telling you what's going while it shuts down all of the processes it doesn't need anymore.

The thing is though, this is the safest way of updating. No more people running apps when prebinding happens causing critical system files to be deleted.

Yeah, I'm glad apple saves me the work now. I'd never update without closing all my active apps. Thx Apple :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!