The worst MacWorld ?


Recommended Posts

Where the hell is Leopard?!!! That's the only thing I wanted to see and it wasn't even shown! The iPhone is nice and all but I can't afford that. And I don't need all those features in a phone anyways. Touchscreen interface is nice though. AppleTV is rather pointless. Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to just burn stuff to DVD? Apple Computer Inc. becomes Apple Inc. Hurrah! And everything is oh so black.

Whether EDGE is 2G or 3G depends on implementation. While Class 3 and below EDGE devices clearly are not 3G, class 4 and above devices perform at a higher bandwidth than other technologies conventionally considered as 3G (such as 1xRTT). Because of the variability, EDGE is generally classified as 2.75G network technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDGE

It is still not Cingular's 3G (HTMS/HSPDA).

Yeah I love the phone but my biggest anticipation was finding out about the "secret" features of Leopard.

And the phone's not CDMA for Verizon :(

The purpose of apple is for a world launch. it's my understanding that the world uses GSM and only a small group of providers use CDMA (Verizon / Sprint etc)

Those of us with Verizon will never get cool phones like this probably because of CDMA which uses a hunk of battery life.

The reason you won't see the iPhone come to CDMA markets immediately is because of one main thing. CDMA carriers (i.e. Verizon, Alltel, US Cellular, et. al.) spend months testing and recoding the device's software to fit their network and features (i.e. Get It Now, EasyEdge, et. al.).

That's a major hurdle for Apple, I would imagine. Opening up their brand new baby to the hacks and whims of whatever company wants to gimp, disable, and otherwise maim (coughVerizoncough) the product to their desires.

And, yes, CDMA sucks battery life at nearly twice the rate of GSM.

Where the hell is Leopard?!!! That's the only thing I wanted to see and it wasn't even shown! The iPhone is nice and all but I can't afford that. And I don't need all those features in a phone anyways. Touchscreen interface is nice though. AppleTV is rather pointless. Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to just burn stuff to DVD? Apple Computer Inc. becomes Apple Inc. Hurrah! And everything is oh so black.

I'm with you brother.

Leopard. Probably won't be out till 2008. Maybe in public beta by MacWorld 2008. Seeing how WWDC is for developers, not the rest of the Mac community. It will only be demoed. Not released.

iPhone (The Apple Version of Zune) an overpriced flop!. Not to say the Zune is overpriced.

Apple TV. WEEEEEEEE!.

Looks like CES was more successful.

I'm with you brother.
Thinking more about it, I am sure that there is a reason that they didn't mention Leopard - what would be funny would be a press conference on Jan 29th announcing immediate availability or something similar.

Yeh it is not ready for public viewing yet.

Leopard. Probably won't be out till 2008. Maybe in public beta by MacWorld 2008. Seeing how WWDC is for developers, not the rest of the Mac community. It will only be demoed. Not released.

iPhone (The Apple Version of Zune) an overpriced flop!. Not to say the Zune is overpriced.

Apple TV. WEEEEEEEE!.

Looks like CES was more successful.

If not WWDC, then a special event like they had for iPod/iTunes, etc. It's coming before 2008.

I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about, the iPhone is one of the most revolutionary pieces of hardware Apple has released. You do realize that the iPod part of the iPhone is a precursor to the new iPods that are soon to come.

Not that I agree or disagree with you but your user name, avatar, user title, and signature makes me think you might be a little bit biased.

Not that I agree or disagree with you but your user name, avatar, user title, and signature makes me think you might be a little bit biased.

I completely agree with him. Does anything about me make you think I might be biased? :rolleyes:

Not to mention that it is the first product using multitouch technology. That's revolutionary by itself.

The purpose of apple is for a world launch. it's my understanding that the world uses GSM and only a small group of providers use CDMA (Verizon / Sprint etc)

Yeah, I know, but it still sucks. Why can't it do both? There are plenty that can work on both networks.

The iPhone looks sweet but it will fail, and it aint revolutionary at all, there have been phones like this before and the touchscreen is what killed it. They found that many users rely on some "feel" of their buttons and such and if you have ever used a touchscreen with small buttons, u would know that it is extremely easy to accidentally click on another button or hold the same button down for a lenghty period. If you want a phone, look at the Blackberry, the Motorolla Q or even the Samsung Blackjack... now those are phones, the iPhone is just an imitation of these phones.

BTW, I like the AppleTV too. (Un)fortunately, my XBox 360 does all of that right now for free (since I already own it). No need to buy. For the price, I think they should have included Time Shifting features for TV viewing...

Ehmm, how did your xbox 360 plays video from your mac hd, or itunes? Because, me as an xbox360 owner, would be very interested in knowing... since now, all I could achive was a poor photo slideshow and some WMV streaming using Connect360... :(

I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about, the iPhone is one of the most revolutionary pieces of hardware Apple has released. You do realize that the iPod part of the iPhone is a precursor to the new iPods that are soon to come.

LOL,

Seriously, compare the specs to MOST Nokia N80/N90 series phones and the Sony Ericsson's flagships

Then take a look at MDA etc.

Now, take a deep breath and say that comment again so we can have another laugh.

This phone would be a STEP BACKWARDS for me compared to my N80

The only thing revolutionary is Apple's marketing & hype to which nobody can argue does the job.

Remember, Betamax was better than VHS, but marketing wins the day.

A very bad MacWorld. Besides the iPhone and AppleTV - neither of which really interests me - I expected and/or wanted to hear -

- specific 10.5 release date set inc system reqs

- iwork/ilife 07

- redesigned mighty mouse

- hardware boosts to mac line

- new iSight

- 10.4.9 in software update

I was hoping Steve would grow up a little and stop bashing his competition in such a childish way. I know I'm gonna get super flamed for this one in a mostly-Mac thread (oh well) but is anyone else tired of seeing Steve come down so hard on Microsoft instead of letting his products sell themselves?

Seriously, how often does Microsoft take Apple ads or logos and light them on fire?

I was hoping Steve would grow up a little and stop bashing his competition in such a childish way. I know I'm gonna get super flamed for this one in a mostly-Mac thread (oh well) but is anyone else tired of seeing Steve come down so hard on Microsoft instead of letting his products sell themselves?

Seriously, how often does Microsoft take Apple ads or logos and light them on fire?

I agree with you. Apple has become such a childish company in the last year or two that it is sad to even listen to Jobs. At the 1997 Macworld Expo, Steve Jobs announced that Apple would be entering into partnership with Microsoft. Included in this was a five-year commitment from Microsoft to release Microsoft Office for Macintosh as well a US$150 million investment in Apple.? One could argue that if it wasn't that $150 million investment, Apple might not be what it is today. Apple needs to grow up.

What's funny is that Vista is being released on schedule and Leopard wasn't even mentioned. Got to wonder what that's all about, huh.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!