The worst MacWorld ?


Recommended Posts

Seriously, how often does Microsoft take Apple ads or logos and light them on fire?

Well, I don't know if you remember it but when Microsoft was starting on the Zune and they made those really strange ads, one showed a large bird and a small bird (representing the iPod and the Zune, respectively) and the large bird burst into flames. Not that it's the same thing, and I'm not disagreeing with you at all, but I just thought I'd mention it.

Time to switch to linux. Apple Computers has become Apple.... Just like every other company out there. Well not true entierly I'm just horribly disappointed. They used to actually release useful stuff at these events and now they're just interested in the media.

"People who have these types of phones are use to paying this amount.. it's not for everyone."

Definately not. Which is weird because with iPod, Apple wanted to gear it to "everyone". With the iPhone they must realize its not affordable or even appealing to everyone. I wonder why they are targetting such a smaller audience with the iPhone.

A very bad MacWorld. Besides the iPhone and AppleTV - neither of which really interests me - I expected and/or wanted to hear -

- specific 10.5 release date set inc system reqs

- iwork/ilife 07

- redesigned mighty mouse

- hardware boosts to mac line

- new iSight

- 10.4.9 in software update

I was very excited to hear about iphone and apple tv but really wanted to also hear about iwork/ilife 07 and the updated mac hardware line. I am purchasing a new Mac once they bring out the new line, so I guess I am waiting a while longer.

Yeah it's on schedule now, how many times was it delayed?

It was officially delayed three times, although no specific date was ever publicly announced. Even so, they did do a complete restart in there too. So a delay would be expected with a complete restart. It still would have been nice for Jobs to give us some kind of update.

I was actually considering going with a MacBook Pro, hoping that we'd get a release time or at least a time frame for Leopard, but with no mention of Leopard at all, I'm going with a Windows Vista powered notebook for sure now. (unless a time frame is announced before Vista is released--which if there was a mention at Macworld about it, I doubt we'll hear anything about it in the next 20 days).

Edited by Hurmoth

The phone is OK in my opinion not revolutionary.

Typing emails on a small touch screen really sucks -- so in a way its also a step back.

My brother brought a mobile phone last year which does everything this does and includes GPS + a sliding keyboard but less ram. I will guess there will be new mobile phones with more ram by mid-year.

What I find odd about making the entire keynote about the iPhone is that it's obviously earlier than Apple would have liked to talk about the iPhone, Jobs said it himself, they knew it was going to get leaked when FCC tested it, they figured the news should come from Apple.

So why not do the entire beginning of the keynote the same, same with Apple TV, then say "well, you're going to need a good OS to serve all that media from.." Make the meat of the show about Leopard..

... do a "one more thing" at the end and show off the iPhone a bit and leave the rest of the explaining to the website.

There are two reasonable explanations that I can think of and one of them is pretty depressing.

1) The one we're all hoping for is that Leopard will be done soon, like March soon, and they'll be holding a special event to show it off. I'm sorry but you don't show it off first at the 2006 WWDC, say Spring 2007 then wait till the NEXT WWDC just to TALK about it next. We can only hope the event is in a few weeks.

2) Apple had a lot of pressure from... **cough** outside.. forces to debut the iPhone early, and strong. I'm thinking not only Cingular, but Yahoo. You can basically count any huge corporation that has any kind of technology banking on this phone. Yahoo is the most like candidate with their movement to IMAP. It may not seem big to you and me, but I bet it is over at Yahoo. And Cingular.. well don't even get me started on that guy.

I thought the keynote was awesome I didn't have high expectations I really just wanted to see the iPhone and it did look pretty amazing I think this is the first time that the final product blows all the rumours out of the water no one could even make up a rumour that included those features it was just so good.

Can't wait for June!

I'm not sure how anyone can be disappointed by the iPhone or Appltv. For the money the iPhone is amazing - is there any other phone that can do everything that it can do? And I mean everything, including the screen size, storage space, and all of it's abilities? I've seen Treo's, Palm Pilots, PDA's, etc, and none of them have the capabilities that the iPhone has. And they all usually run, what, about $300-400 (without a contract or renewal)? Maybe a little more depending on the tech? Nah, the iPhone has them all beat. Is it expensive? Yes, it is, but even without the phone capabilities it makes an incredible mulitmedia toy that also beats any previous iPods (well, except for storage capabilities)

And as far as Leopard goes, if they are going through a change in GUI (as stated in recent Apple forums) then there wasn't much of a chance to show off Leopard or any of the iLife applications. I'm sure this will come later at another event - it has to. For Apple to show off Leopard as it is right now would be ridiculous if the speculation of a new GUI is true.

How did you guys expect updated hardware? All the lines were just updated. Usually, they give an 8 month interval between each upgrade, the Mac Pro is 5 months old, give them a break.

The new iPhone is a nice preview of the upcoming iPod... actually, I think it became the new iPod nano (as of June), but it's a bit expensive lol

The lack of iLife, iWork and Leopard kills me. I wanted TV displays too, but oh well.

Apple's Big Product is the iphone.

The hardware lines were *just* updated. What did you want to see? A 24-core processor????

Leopard is on the way, but it wasn't shown. Apple *knows* they didn't show off Leopard. I think they had pretty good reasons. If you want to know what they are, call them.

Otherwise, get over it.

Even if Apple did refresh the hardware, they could have added :

1) A new iPod with the same display as the iPhone, but only for music/video/photo with a HDD of 40 / 80 Gig.

2) Mac Mini with a Core2 Duo

3) Mac Pro with the new Intel QuadCore CPU

4) Upgraded display, removing the 20,23 inch, replace them with 22, 24 inch and lower the cost. Maybe a updated 30 inch display. Apple LCD seriously cost too much.

Those are all things that people where wishing for. Those are all things that Apple could have done with no problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!