The worst MacWorld ?


Recommended Posts

The iPhone is a beautiful product, but it comes with poor battery life

You people REALLY need to learn to read the specs. The TALK TIME is 5 hours. That is on par with most other smart phones, and acutally better than most of them which have talk times around 3.5 to 4.5 hours. The play time for music is on par with the iPod. Where is this supposed "poor battery life"?

Anyone in a rural area cannot get this new iPod/Phone, so not sure I would really consider it a new iPod. I live just 30 miles from Cingular, but because of where I live almost 90% of the state cannot get Cingular. They should have made it a unlocked quad band phone to work on any network. They should have dual partnered with a rural Carrier like Alltel (who has the largest wireless network) to get more product availability out.

You don't get more rural than most of Mississippi, and I've never had any trouble at all with Cingular here.

You people REALLY need to learn to read the specs. The TALK TIME is 5 hours. That is on par with most other smart phones, and acutally better than most of them which have talk times around 3.5 to 4.5 hours. The play time for music is on par with the iPod. Where is this supposed "poor battery life"?

You don't get more rural than most of Mississippi, and I've never had any trouble at all with Cingular here.

Yes, people are reading it incorrectly, however: 5 hours talk OR 16 hours music OR X hours video. If I spent 8 hours listening to my music, I probably cut talk time down to about 2 hours, give or take (probably give). Since it's an all-in-one item, the battery could have been improved more so than to give a little more than in that aspect than the competition. Don't the latest gen iPods have a 20 hour battery life? I've seen quite a few boast claims to this.

Cool features, mega price tag even with the two year contract. I'll pass :)

Maybe Apple still doesn't want MS to copy some features of some apps before it's released.

I thought about the Macworld one more time, and I think it was obvious that it would disappoint everybody. There was way too much hype around it.

TV Displays, updated cinema displays, Mac Pro with 8 processors, Leopard news, updated iPod, iPhone, iTV, iLife 07, Work, a new Airport Extreme, maybe a new iSight, and I know I forgot some others. It was just impossible to see all that stuff, let's face it. Apple may be IMO a quick company (they are making some nice progress these years and releasing a BUNCH of new stuff), but they still have limits, they're not God after all.

How they could change the iPod right now? All those people who got a 4 months old iPod at christmas, they would see a new iPod that's released? It just doesn't make sense and Apple guys would be asses to do that. It's like :

Our marketing plan was to get rid of all the 5.5G iPods before christmas, and then we would release a new iPod so everybody with a 5.5G iPod would not be satisfied and would buy it.

Leopard was scheduled to be released Spring 2007, it hasn't changed. It will still be released as expected. Don't worry, be happy. :)

iLife and iWork are still in progress, and I thought iLife was always released in February or something. Maybe it'll still hit the shelves in Feb then.

What has not been presented doesn't mean it doesn't exist ;)

What's funny is that Vista is being released on schedule and Leopard wasn't even mentioned. Got to wonder what that's all about, huh.

What planet have you been living on for the last 4 years or so? Vista is being released over two years later than originally scheduled.

What's funny is that Vista is being released on schedule and Leopard wasn't even mentioned. Got to wonder what that's all about, huh.

I don't know how to say this so I'll just say it.....

This *has* to be one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read here at Neowin.

I have pre-ordered my Apple TV and I will be one of the first kids on the block when the iPhone is released in June. I aluded to this in another thread but I wouldn't expect the average Neowin member to get too excited about Macworld 2007. Don't take that as an insult.....it is simply a matter of demographics.

I currently have an Alienware Media Center PC but it's 'kinda clunky and overkill for the most part. TV-tuner cards are essentially a waste of time until such time as they are able to perform DVR functions *and* display content in other than craptastic analog. Apple gets this and that's why Apple TV does not perform these functions. It *does*, on the other hand, seamlessly integrate with iTunes and allow users to watch and/or listen to downloaded content streamed to their widescreen HD TV. If you don't have a widescreen HD TV then this device probably won't appeal to you but trust me.....there are *plenty* of guys like myself who will get one the day they are released. Apple does do their homework 'ya know.

Oh yeah....anyone in the market for an Alienware Media PC give me a shout. I'll give 'ya a 'smokin deal.

Yea it's nice but what about the people that already own a phone and iPod.

something like... give a ****?

if sony ericsson bring out their new 3 mpx cybershot walkman cellphone, noone screams out "aaawww! new developments! what about the folks who already have a cam, a phone and an mp3 player?!"

:) you see what i want to say?

for me this macworld was a bit disappointing aswell, while "disappointing" sounds so negatively... im in love with the iphone, apple tv is cool, apple inc, i dont really care, sounds kinda nice though. i am glad no new macbooks were announced (dont care about anything else atm), mine is pretty much one or one and a half months old but no leopard infos, that sucks...

but infact i can just second that:

My god will people ever stop moaning. iPhone was a huuuuuge announce!! Whether you interested or not, you can't not be satisfied with that?

not every keynote or macworld is supposed to kick out a revolution like the ipod back then.

although a phone by apple kinda is a very HUGE thing. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!