Vista upgrade invalidates your XP key


Recommended Posts

calm down...

if you don't want to use vista, you're allowed to downgrade again, and your xp license is "valid" again... in fact it's valid all the time, the first poster messed this up... you're misunderstanding the eula, it only says, you're not allowed to keep using the license you upgraded from...if you upgraded... downgrade again and you're ok to use it again... not the nicest style, but that's how it's been with xp sp2 too.

Internal Storm has it right !

AND AS TO THIS POST... I believe what it's saying is:

1) if you install Vista ontop of XP as an upgrade, the XP key will be deactivated, meaning you can't install it on another computer as long as Vista is activated.

2) if you uninstall Vista, you can then again install the XP and activate it.

3) Microsoft offers phone activation for a reason, call them and they will make it happen

Enough of this childish "this makes me want to pirate" non sense... This won't affect most of you anyways as you won't be using an upgrade disc, and if you are, read the above and become informed before posting rubbish.

calm down...

if you don't want to use vista, you're allowed to downgrade again, and your xp license is "valid" again... in fact it's valid all the time, the first poster messed this up... you're misunderstanding the eula, it only says, you're not allowed to keep using the license you upgraded from...if you upgraded... downgrade again and you're ok to use it again... not the nicest style, but that's how it's been with xp sp2 too.

Well, that's good to hear.

AND AS TO THIS POST... I believe what it's saying is:

1) if you install Vista ontop of XP as an upgrade, the XP key will be deactivated, meaning you can't install it on another computer as long as Vista is activated.

2) if you uninstall Vista, you can then again install the XP and activate it.

3) Microsoft offers phone activation for a reason, call them and they will make it happen

Yep. I think this is it. You can't have them both installed at the same time, which seems fair enough

From Vista?s EULA found here (PDF) :

13. UPGRADES. To use upgrade software, you must first be licensed for the software that is eligiblefor the upgrade. Upon upgrade, this agreement takes the place of the agreement for the software you upgraded from. After you upgrade, you may no longer use the software you upgraded from.

The story from tomcoyote.org is total FUDNo where in the Microsoft PDF that they refer to does it say they old license key will be invalidatedb>.

Although it does say you can no longer use the software you have upgraded from - The actual text in section 13 is quoted above.

Assuming it is a valid option people should then continue to upgrade from their old win 3.1 windows installation and then stop using win 3.1!:):)

I'm sorry, am I missing something?

I always believed this was how upgrade licensing works. Once you upgrade from v2 to v3, your license for v2 no longer exists and you are licensed for v3. You don't suddenly own 2 licenses for different versions.

Yes, you may have paid for the license of Windows XP, but if you buy a discounted, Upgrade version of Vista, the assumption is you are upgrading permanently and to compensate for the lower price, they are replacing your license, invalidating your old XP one.

This statement is total baloney and shows you have no idea about Microsoft's policies.

The reason Microsoft offer a discount for upgrades is beacuse you have ALREADY paid a significant price for the window operating system development by your previous purchase, and the new (Vista) operating system is significantly based on work YOU HAVE ALREADY PREVIOUSLY PAID FOR.

Nothing whatsoever to do with "upgrading permanently to compensate for the lower price" !

Has anyone noticed that the EULA states its for Vista Home and Ultimate editions.

What if you have a copy of XP Pro and want to Upgrade to Vista Business?

Does anyone know where a copy of the XP Upgrade to Vista EULA is?

EDIT: For the Record

http://download.microsoft.com/documents/us...93ed16d138a.pdf

This statement is total baloney and shows you have no idea about Microsoft's policies.

The reason Microsoft offer a discount for upgrades is beacuse you have ALREADY paid a significant price for the window operating system development by your previous purchase, and the new (Vista) operating system is significantly based on work YOU HAVE ALREADY PREVIOUSLY PAID FOR.

Nothing whatsoever to do with "upgrading permanently to compensate for the lower price" !

Well, why are there no upgrade versions of other major products then? I think I wasn't completely wrong, but if they were invalidating licenses/keys, then I'd be closer to being correct.

The thing is, even if you read that snippet, it doesn't say anything about "invalidating" it. It's saying you "may" not use it. As in, you don't have permission to run it after you upgrade.

If you later remove vista, then you are not subject to the Vista EULA. Therefore you can use XP again. Read it numpties!

Well, why are there no upgrade versions of other major products then? I think I wasn't completely wrong, but if they were invalidating licenses/keys, then I'd be closer to being correct.

What other major products are you talking about here? Most companies offer upgrade licenses for their products. They don't invalidate anything. They merely say you cannot use both Vista and previous versions of Windows you upgraded from at the same time. That is completely understandable as you still own one license. Remember, you're upgrading, not buying new license.

We're going to see more of these pointless articles in days to come. Licensing, DRM, Performance... People have to write something and we all have some time to waste. Just sit back and enjoy. Everything will calm down eventually.

There is no more corporate version ala XP. Corporate versions must be validated as well from now, and for that companies use key server. I don't quite understand your question completely. You buy X-number of licenses and may use it on X number of machines. It's completely irrelevant wether or not you use 1 or 10 000 licenses you bought. Your choice.

An upgrade version is not cheaper because it has restrictions. An upgrade version is cheaper because they assume you already paid for a previous version.

i agree and i think most of you got this article wrong... it just means you cant use XP and Vista at the same time... its either or.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!