101.41 nVidia Drivers for Vista (BETA)


Recommended Posts

Please read the release notes for more information on product support, feature limitations, and known compatibility issues.

32-bit Edition (29.5mb):

http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/101....bit_english.exe

64-bit Edition (42.0 mb):

http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/101....bit_english.exe

Release Notes (1.2mb):

http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/101....lease_Notes.pdf

Source:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_101.41.html

http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x64_101.41.html

Edited by happymonkey
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/543192-10141-nvidia-drivers-for-vista-beta/
Share on other sites

Ohhh! They mention a fix on corrupt display coming back from hibernating/sleep!!! I would so love it if that fixed my issue (though its not *quite* as they describe...perhaps itll still fix it!)

Thanks!

Edit: I attached a modded INF for x86 file so you can install it on all nvidia cards (I think..). Installed it on my GO 7800 GTX with it ;) Install through device manager

Just extract the installer (using winrar or similar program) and overwrite the nv_disp.inf with the one in this zip

nv_disp.zip

Edited by SkyyPunk
Any idea why GeForce FX 5200 isn't supported anymore? All drivers which came out this year don't support this card, although it's compatible with Vista (even Aero).

It probably still works with a modded INF or something. But Nvidia seem to have deprecated support for those cards (especially with Aero) so they can focus on their newer offerings.

Any idea why GeForce FX 5200 isn't supported anymore? All drivers which came out this year don't support this card, although it's compatible with Vista (even Aero).

man nVidia is really cheap with its driver offerings for the ol users.

Any idea why GeForce FX 5200 isn't supported anymore? All drivers which came out this year don't support this card, although it's compatible with Vista (even Aero).

yeah i was wondering the same thing...its weird cause when vista was in beta nvidia released drivers that supported these cards...i really hope they ass support for the 5200

yeah i was wondering the same thing...its weird cause when vista was in beta nvidia released drivers that supported these cards...i really hope they ass support for the 5200

If you use the INF i posted above, it includes these cards in it, so it *should* work on your 5200's:

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0320.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0321.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0322.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 "

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0323.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200LE "

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0323.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200LE"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0329.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 (MAC)"

I wonder when they will fix the flashing text bug in Holdem. I really want to play that game xD

and is it working right with this drivers, i ask anyway myself, how they go whql in the last drivers version with that bug. and holdem poker was longer out allready tan the 100.65...

captureks0.jpg

The above continues to happen randomly whilst playing Titan Quest Immortal Throne / Titan Quest (versions 1.30).

When are Nvidia going to get their act together :s

Edited by ManMountain
captureks0.jpg

The above continues to happen randomly whilst playing Titan Quest Immortal Throne / Titan Quest (versions 1.30).

When are Nvidia going to get their act together :s

To make that go-away Reinstall the drivers. I find the drivers somehow corrupt themselves every so often. Requireing a reinstallation of the files. After that I'm good for a few days/weeks.

Worse still is my children are getting fed up with the Sims 2 crashing as well. I'm starting to miss x64 XP, it never crashed, ever.

Trying to remain patient. It just seems to be taking forever for Nvidia to overcome this.

To make that go-away Reinstall the drivers. I find the drivers somehow corrupt themselves every so often. Requireing a reinstallation of the files. After that I'm good for a few days/weeks.

Thing is, I only just installed these new 101.41 drivers (checks watch) about 50 minutes ago :s

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!