101.41 nVidia Drivers for Vista (BETA)


Recommended Posts

skyppunk, your modified .inf doesnt work for my geforce go 6150 with vista 64 drivers, i get an error saying wrong version of windows, is that inf just for the x86 version? think i'll wait for laptop2govideo update their inf file.

Yea just x86, sorry, shoulda put that in there!

I just took the card info from laptopvideo2go's INFs that I have been using :)

If you use the INF i posted above, it includes these cards in it, so it *should* work on your 5200's:

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0320.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0321.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0322.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 "

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0323.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200LE "

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0323.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200LE"

NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0329.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 (MAC)"

works very good

and is it working right with this drivers, i ask anyway myself, how they go whql in the last drivers version with that bug. and holdem poker was longer out allready tan the 100.65...

i used to have this bug but it was fixed when microsof update prompted me to download texas holdem...i already had holdem and thought it was an update...anyways after downloading it the flashing bug was fixed

It wasn't that long since 100.65, so at this rate, maybe by 103.xx they'll fix all the bugs, then starting with 104.xx or 105.xx they can work on performence to match and probably pass that of XP

It will hardly pass XP level. I hope they don't forget XP users because honestly Vista sucks. I tried playing Battlefield 2 under Vista...Holy **** hard drive is paging like nothing i saw before.

Vista sucks for gaming big time. No matter how good Nvidia drivers get, this OS blows. It looks like Windows Vista doesn't release the memory right for app or game. BF2 crashed few times saying system out of the memory, after which point hard drive started paging like for 5 minutes. With sidebar OS idles almost 700MB...holy ****. Brandon or any Microsoft employee can say whatever they think, but i say Vista has horrible memory management. Most of them work on specific app or part of it, and nobody sees the overall picture called OS. From what I noticed memory is shared and managed across different windows processes i guess ok, but as soon as game or app requires it, OS doesn't release it or frees system from not needed processes. It often happens that hard drive starts spinning like crazy and you're in the middle of the game...probably with no reason or maybe stupid indexing started working. Windows was bashed by Mac users and other people because its GUI wasn't accelerated by GPU like it was case with MacOS. But, Windows XP still out performs MacOS in every aspect...I guess accelerated GUI in MacOS didn't help a lot but looked nice. I don't know the details of new driver model, but it shows that is just one of the wrong technical decisions. A glass looks nice and polished but that's it.

Comparing Vista with 4xxx Longhorn builds i noticed they share similar behavior. In both memory management sucks. For Longhorn it was explained that there was memory leak in it. I think Vista suffers similar issue at some extent. I do coding for years different platforms, mainframe (cobol, natural), java, c++ and i learned that memory management and cpu time are two really importants facts. Imagine a guy who thinks that memory management is great in Vista and starts working on mainframe...where cpu time, memory was essential...not to mention hard drive space which is not an issue any more. Holy ****...company better call IBM for support to recover Mainframe...:)

There are two kind of programmers today. One of them does coding in notepad, and other one uses tools like .Net. Well, the guy who works with .Net will never be as good as the one who does the programming in notepad.

Edited by freak_power
It will hardly pass XP level. I hope they don't forget XP users because honestly Vista sucks. I tried playing Battlefield 2 under Vista...Holy **** hard drive is paging like nothing i saw before.

Vista sucks for gaming big time. No matter how good Nvidia drivers get, this OS blows. It looks like Windows Vista doesn't release the memory right for app or game. BF2 crashed few times saying system out of the memory, after which point hard drive started paging like for 5 minutes. With sidebar OS idles almost 700MB...holy ****. Brandon or any Microsoft employee can say whatever they think, but i say Vista has horrible memory management. Most of them work on specific app or part of it, and nobody sees the overall picture called OS. From what I noticed memory is shared and managed across different windows processes i guess ok, but as soon as game or app requires it, OS doesn't release it or frees system from not needed processes. It often happens that hard drive starts spinning like crazy and you're in the middle of the game...probably with no reason or maybe stupid indexing started working. Windows was bashed by Mac users and other people because its GUI wasn't accelerated by GPU like it was case with MacOS. But, Windows XP still out performs MacOS in every aspect...I guess accelerated GUI in MacOS didn't help a lot but looked nice. I don't know the details of new driver model, but it shows that is just one of the wrong technical decisions. A glass looks nice and polished but that's it.

Comparing Vista with 4xxx Longhorn builds i noticed they share similar behavior. In both memory management sucks. For Longhorn it was explained that there was memory leak in it. I think Vista suffers similar issue at some extent. I do coding for years different platforms, mainframe (cobol, natural), java, c++ and i learned that memory management and cpu time are two really importants facts. Imagine a guy who thinks that memory management is great in Vista and starts working on mainframe...where cpu time, memory was essential...not to mention hard drive space which is not an issue any more. Holy ****...company better call IBM for support to recover Mainframe...:)

There are two kind of programmers today. One of them does coding in notepad, and other one uses tools like .Net. Well, the guy who works with .Net will never be as good as the one who does the programming in notepad.

Can you please stop making posts? Every single post you make is crap. You're crying and whining because your precious Battlefield video game doesn't work properly. Who cares?? I bet your mommy doesn't like you playing video games all day anways. Go do your homework or play outside. You don't understand the point of hardware graphics acceleration either. It allows you to use the graphics card you paid for to render everthing on screen so your cpu can do something more useful.

You talk about your programming experience, but I bet I could embarrass you when it comes to programming. I've done systems programming with IBM's flagship mainframe OS (z/OS), I've programmed in assembly language, etc etc, but you know what? No one cares! I, like everyone else who read your post, don't care that you've tried old ass, worthless languages like cobol (which you think makes you l337 or something). That's not what makes one programmer better than another. As for the comment you made at the end about using programming tools, that's retarded. I use Visual Studio sometimes when I program, not because I don't understand the stuff it does for you, but because I don't want to waste my time with menial tasks like looking up the exact member variable name of a class I created. I already learned and mastered the concepts related to all the little boring crap that the programming tools (like Visual Studio) do for you.

Can you please stop making posts? Every single post you make is crap. You're crying and whining because your precious Battlefield video game doesn't work properly. Who cares?? I bet your mommy doesn't like you playing video games all day anways. Go do your homework or play outside. You don't understand the point of hardware graphics acceleration either. It allows you to use the graphics card you paid for to render everthing on screen so your cpu can do something more useful.

You talk about your programming experience, but I bet I could embarrass you when it comes to programming. I've done systems programming with IBM's flagship mainframe OS (z/OS), I've programmed in assembly language, etc etc, but you know what? No one cares! I, like everyone else who read your post, don't care that you've tried old ass, worthless languages like cobol (which you think makes you l337 or something). That's not what makes one programmer better than another. As for the comment you made at the end about using programming tools, that's retarded. I use Visual Studio sometimes when I program, not because I don't understand the stuff it does for you, but because I don't want to waste my time with menial tasks like looking up the exact member variable name of a class I created. I already learned and mastered the concepts related to all the little boring crap that the programming tools (like Visual Studio) do for you.

I do JAVA, C++, .NET. What was your point dude?

"You don't understand the point of hardware graphics acceleration either. It allows you to use the graphics card you paid for to render everthing on screen so your cpu can do something more useful." - this is really stupid statement. In Vista...both gpu and cpu are dedicated too much to OS. Let me tell you about CPU usage. The CPU usage under Vista is just ridicoulos high. I paid for my CPU and graphic card not to serve OS, but software and games. OS is just there to make it everything happen, to make that wonderful machine called PC to work, and give you ability to fully utilize power of audio, gpu, cpu in apps and game...As I said...glass looks nice and that's all. Not useful for anything else. Battlefield 2 is well known for high demand on memory. Well my friend, Vista is such a crap that combined with game like Battlefield 2. your 2Gb machine is going crazy. Ok, let's get 4Gb of RAM, i guess that's a way to fix broken OS. People are just stupid when they say Vista is faster then XP. Let me push your system the same way i push XP and show you how bad Vista actually is....

i cant install any of the 100 drivers tried them all

i get a black screen after restart then the blue screen of death

the only driver working for me is 97.46

any ideas why ??

running vista prem / 1950gt 512

thx

oh ps using nhancer if that helps ??

Well considering that you have an ATi graphics card I'm not surprised that NVIDIA graphics drivers won't work.

I do JAVA, C++, .NET. What was your point dude?

"You don't understand the point of hardware graphics acceleration either. It allows you to use the graphics card you paid for to render everthing on screen so your cpu can do something more useful." - this is really stupid statement. In Vista...both gpu and cpu are dedicated too much to OS. Let me tell you about CPU usage. The CPU usage under Vista is just ridicoulos high. I paid for my CPU and graphic card not to serve OS, but software and games. OS is just there to make it everything happen, to make that wonderful machine called PC to work, and give you ability to fully utilize power of audio, gpu, cpu in apps and game...As I said...glass looks nice and that's all. Not useful for anything else. Battlefield 2 is well known for high demand on memory. Well my friend, Vista is such a crap that combined with game like Battlefield 2. your 2Gb machine is going crazy. Ok, let's get 4Gb of RAM, i guess that's a way to fix broken OS. People are just stupid when they say Vista is faster then XP. Let me push your system the same way i push XP and show you how bad Vista actually is....

No one cares what programming languages you can code in, It doesn't give you a 'Look at me I'm more clever than you' badge.

I can run BF2 fine on vista, and I'm using a 15.3" LAPTOP. Vista is using less than 600MB of ram now as we speak. Leaving almost 1.5GB of RAM. Thats enough for BF2 I reckon ;) . Now if Vista sucks SOOOO much then don't use it, stop whining it's not doing anyone any good.

Vista isnt as fast for games yet, but with new drivers its getting better all the time.

OOhh you PUSH XP ooooh, look at you big boy! :rofl: Now go away please.

There are two kind of programmers today. One of them does coding in notepad, and other one uses tools like .Net. Well, the guy who works with .Net will never be as good as the one who does the programming in notepad.

bwahahahahahahahhahaaaaaaaaa *takes breath* whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahaaaa

you're funny man, real funny ;). You just made it obvious that you've never programmed a real program in your entire life

i cant install any of the 100 drivers tried them all

i get a black screen after restart then the blue screen of death

the only driver working for me is 97.46

any ideas why ??

running vista prem / 1950gt 512

thx

oh ps using nhancer if that helps ??

Well considering that you have an ATi graphics card I'm not surprised that NVIDIA graphics drivers won't work.

OMG WHAT AM I LIKE

it was late last night my card is a 7950gt

any ideas ?

Some people seem to think that all it takes is more RAM to get an OS like Vista to work right, 4GB for vista article a week ago is a good example.

But that's just far from the truth, drivers are key to the whole thing, if your game is giving you problems it's one of 2 things, video card drivers don't play nice with the game in question for Vista yet. Or the game itself needs a patch to be Vista compatible.

Case in point, lots of people run the same game just fine without any problems on their desktops or even laptops, yet others have problems and crashes. This just shows that the problem lies with a specific hardware setup, be it video card +chipset drivers are making Vista act up, or the game + drivers are making it act up for your specific video card.

Saying Vista blows when you're in the minority of users who have loads of problems is pointless. Many others don't have any problems aside from slower performence, which will be fixed with new drivers soon.

Case in point, lots of people run the same game just fine without any problems on their desktops or even laptops, yet others have problems and crashes. This just shows that the problem lies with a specific hardware setup, be it video card +chipset drivers are making Vista act up, or the game + drivers are making it act up for your specific video card.

Could not agree with you more. I actually run a clan for both BF2 (which freak_power was complaning about) and BF2142. Myself and a few others in my clan are all running 64 bit Ultimate and are having no problems at all. Actually seems to run better than XP. Certinally looks better.

Is there any software other than Rivatuner (doesn't support this driver) that allows you to control fan speed?

My 7600GT fan is EXTREMELY noisy unless I can customize the speeds. In XP I had the 2D enviroment set at 25% fan speed. Right now it sounds like its running at 80-100% and is annoying.

Thanks! :)

Some people seem to think that all it takes is more RAM to get an OS like Vista to work right, 4GB for vista article a week ago is a good example.

But that's just far from the truth, drivers are key to the whole thing, if your game is giving you problems it's one of 2 things, video card drivers don't play nice with the game in question for Vista yet. Or the game itself needs a patch to be Vista compatible.

Case in point, lots of people run the same game just fine without any problems on their desktops or even laptops, yet others have problems and crashes. This just shows that the problem lies with a specific hardware setup, be it video card +chipset drivers are making Vista act up, or the game + drivers are making it act up for your specific video card.

Saying Vista blows when you're in the minority of users who have loads of problems is pointless. Many others don't have any problems aside from slower performence, which will be fixed with new drivers soon.

Exactly.

Case in point: I run Windows Vista Ultimate (x86) on what can charitably be called *dead hardware* (*dead hardware* is hardware that, while still supported by the manufacturer, is not only no longer manufactured, but hasn't been for at least eighteen months).

Motherboard: ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe (eighteen months dead)

CPU: Intel P4 2.6 Northwood-C (two years dead)

RAM: 1 GB PNY OPTIMA (2x512 MB DDR400) (eighteen months dead; purchased two years ago)

Graphics: Built By ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro AGP (purchased new four years ago; replaced under warranty two years ago, product had been *dead* one year at time of replacement)

Audio: Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Gamer Limited Edition (eighteen months dead)

Except for the motherboard and memory, every other item has supposedly had issues with Windows Vista for someone here on Neowin. (That includes the CPU, which has been called *too slow*.) Yet, for me, it all works, and lets me do what I want/need to do (including playing Supreme Commander, which I also beta-tested on the same hardware).

Notice I did NOT list my TV tuner (ATI HDTV Wonder) or webcam (Logitech QuickCam Communicate STX) because neither product is dead (both have also gotten their share of bad press here at Neowin). Yet both not only work, but auto-installed updated drivers when Vista detected them (what makes the webcam's case all the funnier is that Microsoft's LifeCam models compete *directly* with the STX, yet Vista detected and installed the new drivers and software with ZERO prompting from me).

Last, and certainly least, is the three-years-dead HP DeskJet 940C. Just like in XP, Vista detected and installed the drivers with zero prompting (then again, this is the *only* truly Plug and Print USB inkjet printer that has worked on every OS I've thrown at it, including Solaris, which is notoriously finicky about printers).

You hear about problems; however, you almost never hear about the LACK of problems because they are too busy having fun (or getting real work done).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      179
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!