Recommended Posts

There is no reason to buy a PC nowadays. You get the benefit of Mac OS X & u can run XP or Vista (don't know about the Mac drivers). Plus u get a beautiful machine.

price would be one good reason ;), altough the gap is getting smaller you still pay a lot for the mac brand and design :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588440010
Share on other sites

well I as a Mac user can say I have a machine for which the hardware components and system all fits together just perfectly...

If I look into those advertisements and see how mixed those machines are and that there are still lots of thinks Apple puts innovation into...

for example: the motion sensor in the macbooks, apple remote that doesn't need a billion keys and suits the mac...

it all doesn't look mixed up, rather like born to be combined...

that's why Apple is the only computer builder I trust.

Glassed Silver:mac

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588440106
Share on other sites

There is no reason to buy a PC nowadays. You get the benefit of Mac OS X & u can run XP or Vista (don't know about the Mac drivers). Plus u get a beautiful machine.

What about the price then?

yep. There's the reason.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588440107
Share on other sites

What about the price then?

yep. There's the reason.

I'm a Mac user and looking for a new system to replace my iMac G5. Macs are more expensive than PCs depending on what you want. Want a core 2 system, 1 gb ram, pretty fast video and not much expandability/upgradability? Get an iMac.

But if I want to expand and upgrade (video card, sound, etc) and I don't so much care about the CPU then Macs are more expensive. For what it is the MacPros are really nice computers, but buying dual Xeons is too much just to get the expand and upgrade with expansion cards.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588440669
Share on other sites

Single reason I will never spend a significant amount of money on a Mac: I can't build it myself. For me at least, a new computer is a hands-on building experience, and clearly that will never happen with a Mac. Fine by me, I don't need a piece of trendy white plastic.

but that's the reason for getting a Mac: it's not a system that is "randomly" built. it's a machine that's built with components and is expected to work in a certain manner.

i spent a lot of money on a mac recently. and it's been great. i love it. no regrets at all. it just works and works beautifully

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588440707
Share on other sites

Single reason I will never spend a significant amount of money on a Mac: I can't build it myself. For me at least, a new computer is a hands-on building experience, and clearly that will never happen with a Mac. Fine by me, I don't need a piece of trendy white plastic.

I used to be the same way. But honestly, it gets old. Most machines have enough power for me these days that it just isn't an issue. Putting tab A into slot B gets really boring, as does fighting with Windows drivers.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588441033
Share on other sites

...as does fighting with Windows drivers.

Fighting with Windows drivers is no worse (or better) than non-existent drivers for Mac. They both have positives and negatives, it just depends on what things you prefer and what other things you are willing to put up with.

Also, drivers are only as good as the 3rd party producing them. Crappy 3rd parties produce crappy drivers which produce a crappy Mac/Windows experience.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588441179
Share on other sites

Single reason I will never spend a significant amount of money on a Mac: I can't build it myself. For me at least, a new computer is a hands-on building experience, and clearly that will never happen with a Mac.

Other than your last line (which I removed), that's the exact reason I got a mac. I did not want to have to build my system. I don't have time, nor do I care. I clicked "order" on apple.com, and in a few days it was at my house. I plugged it in and it worked. That's what I want.

As for "Fine by me, I don't need a piece of trendy white plastic." ... I don't know of any people who bought it to be "trendy." $1500+ is a lot to be "trendy" if you're not wanting it's other features. And the white plastic happens to be its case... Yet another pathetic attempt at 'insulting' a mac. You don't see me insulting PCs, so why do you have to?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588441187
Share on other sites

Other than your last line (which I removed), that's the exact reason I got a mac. I did not want to have to build my system. I don't have time, nor do I care. I clicked "order" on apple.com, and in a few days it was at my house. I plugged it in and it worked. That's what I want.

... and you can't do that with a PC manufacturer?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/550272-bye-bye-mac/#findComment-588441196
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!