Recommended Posts

the motion sensor in the macbooks

Hardly innovation...

http://www.paul.sladen.org/thinkpad-r31/accelerometer.html

IBM ThinkPad Accelerometer, aka "Active Protection System"

Announced in November 2003; Probably shipped in 2004 March

Other than your last line (which I removed), that's the exact reason I got a mac. I did not want to have to build my system. I don't have time, nor do I care. I clicked "order" on apple.com, and in a few days it was at my house. I plugged it in and it worked. That's what I want.

Your comment only makes sense if you've never heard of Dell, Gateway, FalconNorthwest, Hewlett-Packard, or the dozens of other PC manufacturers & Resellers that you can order pre-built systems.

I'm pretty sure that you've heard of these companies at some point or another, unless you've been living in a cave for the past 15 years. I build systems for my friends as a hobby and charge them a reasonable & fair price - which is exactly what those other companies provide.

--ScottKin

I use a Desktop Windows machine and a Macintosh Laptop. I think personally the desktop Macs are way overpriced for what they offer.

iMac: It's just not upgradeable. You can't stick more storage into it without removing the drive that is already in there. It uses a Laptop CPU in a Desktop system, what is the point of that other than Apple saving on enclosure size power and noise? They still charge desktop prices for it however. the GPU isn't upgradeable and it isn't fast. You cant buy a better monitor for it as it has one built in, and you cant change the Optical drive for a Bluray or HD-DVD drive without voiding the warranty (and really what drives even fit). It's just a bad machine, it's like buying a Laptop without any of the benefits of a Laptop.

Mac Pro: Grossly overpriced for the power it offers, they don't innovate the case enough to warrant such a high price tag, it only has software RAID & 4 HD's maximum. The only good thing about this machine is that you can upgrade the Woodcrests to Clovertowns and make it a Octo-Core Mac. That and the pull out RAM side-boards, which are pretty great. Again this machine at stock comes with a 7300GT, that GPU is just so much slower than what you get in competitive systems, everyone keeps saying "get a Mac and dual boot windows to game!" well I can't play any decent games on my 20" ACD with a 7300GT, and if you put a normal windows GPU in there you get a black screen from within Mac OS X which defeats the easeyness of a dual boot machine.

The only Macs I think are decent value are the MacBook Pro's as they offer the MagSafe connector the built in iSight they have a decent enough laptop GPU run passively for the most part and have really nice displays and enclosures. The Mac desktops on the other hand as I said are just useless non-upgradeable overpriced bricks. btw I love my 17" MacBook Pro and I wouldn't trade it for the world. I am just an honest multi-OS user and I can say when something sucks.

PC > Mac, always was, always will be.

One doesn't have to be better than the other, it depends on your uses. The average Joe who doesn't play video games on their computer and likes a stylish computer that just works and no hassle with hardware problems and virus can use a Mac and be happy. At the same time the hardcores like to build their own system and buy new components all the time for maximum performance, they go for PC's. It's not that hard you guys, to each his own.

There is no reason to buy a PC nowadays. You get the benefit of Mac OS X & u can run XP or Vista (don't know about the Mac drivers). Plus u get a beautiful machine.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

Can't run Linux? :blink: Uh, last I checked, there were both PowerPC and x86 versions of most Linux distros.

once a mac hater, always a mac hater.

stop drinking so much haterade, people...

if this were a swamp, you'd be an allihater...

sure, come on up. take the elehater...

No I used to be a mac hater too, I used Windows since 3.11 up until XP, then I tried OSX86 and ended up buying a Mac shortly afterwards :)

I could almost guarantee that any mac hater hasn't spent even 10 minutes on a Mac running OS X.

If they have, then they ain't hating anymore.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

:s You should've just went to an Apple Store or called again because all macs have a 1 year warranty. Sounds like you just got someone who had a bad day on the other line.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

Your claims are dubious but if you give up after they hang up on you once then don't ever call any other customer service number again because you need to put more effort in.

I could almost guarantee that any mac hater hasn't spent even 10 minutes on a Mac running OS X.

If they have, then they ain't hating anymore.

You actually got me to laugh out loud with that one... :whistle:

I own a mac mini, I still don't like macs. I run Ubuntu on it because I can't stand OSX. Please don't make silly comments like you just did :rolleyes: :blink:

Your claims are dubious but if you give up after they hang up on you once then don't ever call any other customer service number again because you need to put more effort in.

But I thought Macs "just work" :laugh:

I bought a MacBook this go around after my self-built desktop kept giving me fits. I used to love building my PCs and solving issues for family and friends but now I guess I'm at the point where I just don't want to spend the time on it anymore. I don't game on the computer anymore, either, preferring my 360.

As has been stated previously, it depends on the user and what exactly they want out of it. And personally, I don't agree with the whole "you have to buy a new Mac in 3 years". Actually, you don't. Unless you need specific features, you can easily use a Mac for about 5 years. There are people still running 10.2.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

Yeah, and anyone who has a system that is 3 years old has to spend for upgrades in order to run Vista. That's a reality.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

My bull**** sensor has gone into overdrive!

1 year warranty... ever care to think about ringing an apple reseller for help and advice, or even walking into an apple store/ reseller store?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!