Recommended Posts

the motion sensor in the macbooks

Hardly innovation...

http://www.paul.sladen.org/thinkpad-r31/accelerometer.html

IBM ThinkPad Accelerometer, aka "Active Protection System"

Announced in November 2003; Probably shipped in 2004 March

Other than your last line (which I removed), that's the exact reason I got a mac. I did not want to have to build my system. I don't have time, nor do I care. I clicked "order" on apple.com, and in a few days it was at my house. I plugged it in and it worked. That's what I want.

Your comment only makes sense if you've never heard of Dell, Gateway, FalconNorthwest, Hewlett-Packard, or the dozens of other PC manufacturers & Resellers that you can order pre-built systems.

I'm pretty sure that you've heard of these companies at some point or another, unless you've been living in a cave for the past 15 years. I build systems for my friends as a hobby and charge them a reasonable & fair price - which is exactly what those other companies provide.

--ScottKin

I use a Desktop Windows machine and a Macintosh Laptop. I think personally the desktop Macs are way overpriced for what they offer.

iMac: It's just not upgradeable. You can't stick more storage into it without removing the drive that is already in there. It uses a Laptop CPU in a Desktop system, what is the point of that other than Apple saving on enclosure size power and noise? They still charge desktop prices for it however. the GPU isn't upgradeable and it isn't fast. You cant buy a better monitor for it as it has one built in, and you cant change the Optical drive for a Bluray or HD-DVD drive without voiding the warranty (and really what drives even fit). It's just a bad machine, it's like buying a Laptop without any of the benefits of a Laptop.

Mac Pro: Grossly overpriced for the power it offers, they don't innovate the case enough to warrant such a high price tag, it only has software RAID & 4 HD's maximum. The only good thing about this machine is that you can upgrade the Woodcrests to Clovertowns and make it a Octo-Core Mac. That and the pull out RAM side-boards, which are pretty great. Again this machine at stock comes with a 7300GT, that GPU is just so much slower than what you get in competitive systems, everyone keeps saying "get a Mac and dual boot windows to game!" well I can't play any decent games on my 20" ACD with a 7300GT, and if you put a normal windows GPU in there you get a black screen from within Mac OS X which defeats the easeyness of a dual boot machine.

The only Macs I think are decent value are the MacBook Pro's as they offer the MagSafe connector the built in iSight they have a decent enough laptop GPU run passively for the most part and have really nice displays and enclosures. The Mac desktops on the other hand as I said are just useless non-upgradeable overpriced bricks. btw I love my 17" MacBook Pro and I wouldn't trade it for the world. I am just an honest multi-OS user and I can say when something sucks.

PC > Mac, always was, always will be.

One doesn't have to be better than the other, it depends on your uses. The average Joe who doesn't play video games on their computer and likes a stylish computer that just works and no hassle with hardware problems and virus can use a Mac and be happy. At the same time the hardcores like to build their own system and buy new components all the time for maximum performance, they go for PC's. It's not that hard you guys, to each his own.

There is no reason to buy a PC nowadays. You get the benefit of Mac OS X & u can run XP or Vista (don't know about the Mac drivers). Plus u get a beautiful machine.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

Can't run Linux? :blink: Uh, last I checked, there were both PowerPC and x86 versions of most Linux distros.

once a mac hater, always a mac hater.

stop drinking so much haterade, people...

if this were a swamp, you'd be an allihater...

sure, come on up. take the elehater...

No I used to be a mac hater too, I used Windows since 3.11 up until XP, then I tried OSX86 and ended up buying a Mac shortly afterwards :)

I could almost guarantee that any mac hater hasn't spent even 10 minutes on a Mac running OS X.

If they have, then they ain't hating anymore.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

:s You should've just went to an Apple Store or called again because all macs have a 1 year warranty. Sounds like you just got someone who had a bad day on the other line.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

Your claims are dubious but if you give up after they hang up on you once then don't ever call any other customer service number again because you need to put more effort in.

I could almost guarantee that any mac hater hasn't spent even 10 minutes on a Mac running OS X.

If they have, then they ain't hating anymore.

You actually got me to laugh out loud with that one... :whistle:

I own a mac mini, I still don't like macs. I run Ubuntu on it because I can't stand OSX. Please don't make silly comments like you just did :rolleyes: :blink:

Your claims are dubious but if you give up after they hang up on you once then don't ever call any other customer service number again because you need to put more effort in.

But I thought Macs "just work" :laugh:

I bought a MacBook this go around after my self-built desktop kept giving me fits. I used to love building my PCs and solving issues for family and friends but now I guess I'm at the point where I just don't want to spend the time on it anymore. I don't game on the computer anymore, either, preferring my 360.

As has been stated previously, it depends on the user and what exactly they want out of it. And personally, I don't agree with the whole "you have to buy a new Mac in 3 years". Actually, you don't. Unless you need specific features, you can easily use a Mac for about 5 years. There are people still running 10.2.

...and in 3 years time your systems old, can't run Linux and instead of buying a new mobo+processor, you have to buy a whole new mac.

Please, get real.

Yeah, and anyone who has a system that is 3 years old has to spend for upgrades in order to run Vista. That's a reality.

I am a mac hater, I had a mac mini, used it for 60days.. it was great until it decided not to boot, I called Apple support and they denied all responsibility and hung up on me cause I did not have AppleCare. $900 in 60days down the drain... that would **** anyone off.

Screw a mac.. get a Tablet!

My bull**** sensor has gone into overdrive!

1 year warranty... ever care to think about ringing an apple reseller for help and advice, or even walking into an apple store/ reseller store?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!