Recommended Posts

:s You should've just went to an Apple Store or called again because all macs have a 1 year warranty. Sounds like you just got someone who had a bad day on the other line.

1yr for hardware, 30days for software... according to the Apple Store... mine was a software issue.

Can any of the mac people in here tell me why they are so damn agressive when someone says mac sucks? Seriously, you guys are worse than the console boys.

I don't even own a mac, I am just sick of all sides throwing insults. And why is it you have to stab at the Mac people? Windows, and Linux users are all just as bad.

1yr for hardware, 30days for software... according to the Apple Store... mine was a software issue.

If it was a Software issue then why didn't you Reinstall? and if it was Hardware why didn't you call back and tell them you tried fixing the software?

I don't believe your story I'm afraid.

If it was a Software issue then why didn't you Reinstall? and if it was Hardware why didn't you call back and tell them you tried fixing the software?

I don't believe your story I'm afraid.

Maybe you should start believing cause thats exactly what happen. I did re-install OSX.. twice, it still wouldnt boot and every Apple authorized repair place rejected me cause I did not have Apple Care. So get out of your "Mac is invincible" bubble and face reality.. Apple took my money and that is the end of it, and if u dont like me blaming apple then so be it!

Maybe you should start believing cause thats exactly what happen. I did re-install OSX.. twice, it still wouldnt boot and every Apple authorized repair place rejected me cause I did not have Apple Care. So get out of your "Mac is invincible" bubble and face reality.. Apple took my money and that is the end of it, and if u dont like me blaming apple then so be it!

Yes apple bubble, I'm replying to you from a Windows Vista Ultimate PC that I built myself. yup them Apples sure got me!...

right. I just don't like listening to lies. Your story just doesn't make sense. Either you are very very unlucky to be turned down by multiple service stations and hang up on the phone or your telling porky pies. You get 90-days of support btw not 30.

I know for sure if Apple screwed me over I would do something about it to get my money back / refund / replacement. Trading Standards would have been called instantly.

Maybe you should start believing cause thats exactly what happen. I did re-install OSX.. twice, it still wouldnt boot and every Apple authorized repair place rejected me cause I did not have Apple Care. So get out of your "Mac is invincible" bubble and face reality.. Apple took my money and that is the end of it, and if u dont like me blaming apple then so be it!

Wait what? You reinstaleld and yet it wouldn't work even after? How many times did you call them? Did you tell them that it wouldn't boot even after a fresh install?

People use PCs for different reasons. I might get a macbook in the future simply because it's a lot easier to work with in terms of using unix pipelines and such. It's all due to personal preference so why don't y'all just settle down and enjoy whatever computer you have, be it pc or mac.

Wait what? You reinstaleld and yet it wouldn't work even after? How many times did you call them? Did you tell them that it wouldn't boot even after a fresh install?

I called them after the 2nd reinstall, I called Apple, they told me to reinstall it again, I told them I did and they told me "Sorry, your warranty for our software has expired." so I went to the Apple Store at the Eatons Center in Toronto, They took it and after looking at it for 20min they said that nothing can be done for it.

I called them after the 2nd reinstall, I called Apple, they told me to reinstall it again, I told them I did and they told me "Sorry, your warranty for our software has expired." so I went to the Apple Store at the Eatons Center in Toronto, They took it and after looking at it for 20min they said that nothing can be done for it.

I've never heard of anything as "warranty for software". If the machine doesn't work, it doesn't work and that's how it's always been for me with Apple. You have 1 year for coverage of your mac--you should've called Apple again and told them it had to be a hardware problem because your mini didn't boot. They would've asked you to send it in for repair.

I've never heard of anything as "warranty for software". If the machine doesn't work, it doesn't work and that's how it's always been for me with Apple. You have 1 year for coverage of your mac--you should've called Apple again and told them it had to be a hardware problem because your mini didn't boot. They would've asked you to send it in for repair.

o.O.. i should of, well then how come the Apple Store didnt figure it out?

I've been using that for 3 years on my ThinkPad.

Don't get me wrong... it's not that there is a lack of innovation by Apple - there is plenty and for that I am grateful, as it helps drive the entire OS community forward (as do innovations by Microsoft and the Linux world), this just isn't one of the cases of it...

<OT>

I remember the first time I found this bad boy on my R51... it has a picture of the machine which tilts when you tilt the machine... absolute magic!

</OT>

Wait what? You reinstaleld and yet it wouldn't work even after? How many times did you call them? Did you tell them that it wouldn't boot even after a fresh install?

I'm sorry, but you have to admit it's lies... if I can get a response out of Dell after 3 months of owning one of their machines, you sure as hell could get one out of Apple..

I called them after the 2nd reinstall, I called Apple, they told me to reinstall it again, I told them I did and they told me "Sorry, your warranty for our software has expired." so I went to the Apple Store at the Eatons Center in Toronto, They took it and after looking at it for 20min they said that nothing can be done for it.

Cool, i'll look you up if i'm ever trying to shift broken goods, i'll just tell you your 15 minute warranty is up and i'm sure you'll give up.

Seriously though, I got a 24" iMac a few months ago (purely because it was going cheap) and loved OSX (mainly for the apple remote + front row combo). Sadly however, it was completely detrimental to my work, so I switched to XP. I occasionally dive back into OSX for the pleasure of it, but until they get over not being able to properly maximise apps, i'm gone. My other desktop has always run some flavour of linux, so i'm not just some n00b that didn't understand OSX.

^Was having the same issues with maximized applications such as Photoshop and such but now I'm used to it. I can finally see why it's the way it is as I was switching from multiple folders on the desktop and importing items into what I was working on. The work flow is there, it's a matter of getting used to the process is all.

Not to be annoying but on a screen size of 24" you wanted to run maxed on the applications? I'm on 20" iMac and the size is just right for me, 24" was just too huge. Felt like I was swimming in some ocean or something.

I'm also with the frame of mind that people can do without the [insert pc manufacturer here] systems and just go with an Apple system. If you need Xp or Vista, bootcamp it or parallel it and you are off and running. Average joe user doesn't need to mod or tweak their system up and out.

Just out of curiosity I did a search to compare PC and Mac. I picked Dell for the PC since it's the most "mainstream." I connected one these for someone at work that bought one and was amazed at the absolutely no noise it made. No discernible fan noise at all. I had to double check to make sure it was on. I upgraded the components where needed to match Apple as closely as possible. Anyways, here it is:

XPS 410

$1,249

My Components

Intel? Core?2 Duo Processor E6400 (2MB L2 Cache,2.13GHz,1066 FSB)

Genuine Windows Vista? Home Premium

1GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 2 DIMMs

250GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache?

Single Drive: 16X CD/DVD burner (DVD+/-RW) w/double layer write capability

20 inch UltraSharp? 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel

256MB ATI Radeon X1300 Pro

Integrated 7.1
My Accessories
ories
[/b]
s

Dell AS501 10W Flat Panel Attached Spkrs for UltraSharp? Flat Panels

Dell USB Keyboard

Dell Optical USB Mouse

No Floppy Drive Included

56K
My Software
oftware
[/b]
are

Microsoft Works 8. DOES NOT INCLUDE MS WORD

McAfee SecurityCenter with anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewall, 15-months

Trial pack- Basic and trial products fr
My Service
Service
[/b]
ice

1Yr Ltd Warranty and At-Home Service

6 Months of America Online M
Also Includes
ncludes
[/b]
des

Adobe? Acrobat? Reader 7.0

Windows Vista? Premium

And this is from the Apple site. I tried to pick a middle of the road computer.

^Was having the same issues with maximized applications such as Photoshop and such but now I'm used to it. I can finally see why it's the way it is as I was switching from multiple folders on the desktop and importing items into what I was working on. The work flow is there, it's a matter of getting used to the process is all.

Not to be annoying but on a screen size of 24" you wanted to run maxed on the applications? I'm on 20" iMac and the size is just right for me, 24" was just too huge. Felt like I was swimming in some ocean or something.

I'm also with the frame of mind that people can do without the [insert pc manufacturer here] systems and just go with an Apple system. If you need Xp or Vista, bootcamp it or parallel it and you are off and running. Average joe user doesn't need to mod or tweak their system up and out.

I only have 1GB, parallels is not an option on < 1.5GB. As for maximising, I'm a coder first, I design for fun. I understand completely why it is the way it is, it just doesn't suit me because i get distracted by the slightest things. I gave OSX 2 months and it just didn't work out. The 24 is what was on offer, so i took it.

The iMacs use Merom (Laptop) processors while your average desktop PC will use Conroe (Desktop) processors. The reason the iMac uses laptop instead of desktop processors is because the iMac's enclosure is much like a laptop. Not much space in there so it needs to keep heat down as much as possible.

Nice comparison though. Although the iMac 20" uses an ATI Radeon X1600. I wonder when doing a comparison would Vista Home Premium be equal to OS X Tiger. You get all features with Tiger but not all with Home Premium.

Just out of curiosity I did a search to compare PC and Mac. I picked Dell for the PC since it's the most "mainstream." I connected one these for someone at work that bought one and was amazed at the absolutely no noise it made. No discernible fan noise at all. I had to double check to make sure it was on. I upgraded the components where needed to match Apple as closely as possible. Anyways, here it is:

XPS 410

$1,249

My Components

Intel? Core?2 Duo Processor E6400 (2MB L2 Cache,2.13GHz,1066 FSB)

Genuine Windows Vista? Home Premium

1GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 2 DIMMs

250GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache?

Single Drive: 16X CD/DVD burner (DVD+/-RW) w/double layer write capability

20 inch UltraSharp? 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel

256MB ATI Radeon X1300 Pro

Integrated 7.1
My Accessories
ories
[/b]
s

Dell AS501 10W Flat Panel Attached Spkrs for UltraSharp? Flat Panels

Dell USB Keyboard

Dell Optical USB Mouse

No Floppy Drive Included

56K
My Software
oftware
[/b]
are

Microsoft Works 8. DOES NOT INCLUDE MS WORD

McAfee SecurityCenter with anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewall, 15-months

Trial pack- Basic and trial products fr
My Service
Service
[/b]
ice

1Yr Ltd Warranty and At-Home Service

6 Months of America Online M
Also Includes
ncludes
[/b]
des

Adobe? Acrobat? Reader 7.0

Windows Vista? Premium

And this is from the Apple site. I tried to pick a middle of the road computer.

Not a fair comparison as the iMac has Bluetooth, WiFi and a better graphics card (albeit not much better at all). I think $ for $ they match up almost exactly once you bridge the gap.. An XPS410 has very little in the way of expandability too... so what was your point?

Don't forget iLife.

Not a fair comparison as the iMac has Bluetooth, WiFi and a better graphics card (albeit not much better at all). I think $ for $ they match up almost exactly once you bridge the gap.. An XPS410 has very little in the way of expandability too... so what was your point?

I'll give it Bluetooth and WiFi, but Dell's video card is 256Mb while iMac's is 128Mb so I would call it a wash (although I'd rather have the 256Mb). The XPS410 has plenty expandabillity, I've been in its chassis. In fact, as far as expandability I velieve the iMac would be much harder to expand than the Dell. My point was to satisfy my own curiosity. I'm planning on getting a Mac as my next computer.

You know, it's that agressive yet defensive tone that gives Mac zealots a bad name. Relax.

Don't forget iLife.

I personally don't understand the big deal about iLife... I have not been that impressed with it and to be honest Vista does everything it needs to out of the box to be comparable for me (and that is my own opinion, not an excuse to start a flame war)...

I'll give it Bluetooth and WiFi, but Dell's video card is 256Mb while iMac's is 128Mb so I would call it a wash (although I'd rather have the 256Mb). The XPS410 has plenty expandabillity, I've been in its chassis. In fact, as far as expandability I velieve the iMac would be much harder to expand than the Dell. My point was to satisfy my own curiosity. I'm planning on getting a Mac as my next computer.

You know, it's that agressive yet defensive tone that gives Mac zealots a bad name. Relax.

Mac Zealot? who me? I am PC all the way, Macs are lovely machines, and I made my computer unfriendly sister buy one, but I am sitting in front of my Vista Ultimate machine at the moment... thanks.

The point I was making, is that the XPS410 is not a good example of the 'PC are ultimately expandable' arguement, better to use say the E520 which is a real mini tower machine (as opposed to the SFF XPS410).

I am amused.. me a Mac Zealot :D

Don't forget that with the Mac you don't have to spend the time to uninstall all the bundled software and get going nice and quick. Also we got Boot Camp in the Mac world, which enables us to slap down Xp, Vista, Linux on our systems as well where as the Dell system you can install all those too, but you don't have OS X (legally).

Mac > Dell any day of the week.

I personally don't understand the big deal about iLife... I have not been that impressed with it and to be honest Vista does everything it needs to out of the box to be comparable for me (and that is my own opinion, not an excuse to start a flame war)...

I have yet to find a better consumer video editing software from what iMovie offers. I don't use Garageband nearly as much as iMovie but I'm not sure if Vista comes with music authoring software? Just wondering since I have yet to move on to Vista as XP is holding me well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!